You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by "Ng, Charles" <Ch...@cognos.com> on 2002/05/01 22:16:30 UTC
[PATCH] WSDL2Java - BindingStub not registering all types.
I've attached a patch for this problem.
The type mappings were generated from types that are used in operations.
Having the "-a" option does not change that fact.
I've modified the code to get the types from the symbol table and only
generate the type mappings where the types are referenced. (The "-a" flag
makes all symbol table entries referenced)
Charles
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Butek [mailto:butek@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:07 PM
> To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: WSDL2Java - BindingStub not registering all types.
>
>
> Sylvain, I thought the -a option ws supposed to register all
> types. We
> discussed this a while ago and I believe we agreed. Either
> we never did
> the work or it was inadvertently removed.
>
> All types should be registered in both the Stub AND in the
> deploy.wsdd file
> if -a is turned on.
>
> I'll fix this after beta 2.
>
> Russell Butek
> butek@us.ibm.com
>
>
> "St-Germain, Sylvain" <Sy...@cognos.com> on
> 04/22/2002 10:19:58
> AM
>
> Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org
>
> To: "Axis Dev (E-mail)" <ax...@xml.apache.org>
> cc:
> Subject: WSDL2Java - BindingStub not registering all types.
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> When the -a option was added to WSDL2Java it was mainly to serve the
> purpose
> of being able to use (thus serialize) the objects defined in
> the WSDL even
> though they appeared unused from a WSDL perspective.
>
> I realize now that WSDL2Java does some smarts about it and
> will not define
> the QName for a type for which it does not find a
> reference... or something
> like that.
>
> All types I define (this is true for all my SOAP Header types) are not
> being
> mapped in my BindingStub. Is it possible to add mapping in the
> BindingStub
> for all types defined in the WSDL regardless of them being
> referred to or
> not?
>
> This is using -the somewhat old- March 25th build. I will
> check with a
> more
> recent build.
> --
> Sylvain
>
> This message may contain privileged and/or confidential
> information. If
> you
> have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended
> recipient, you
> may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any
> attachments, delete it immediately from your system and
> notify the sender
> promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.
>
>
This message may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you
have received this e-mail in error or are not the intended recipient, you
may not use, copy, disseminate or distribute it; do not open any
attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender
promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.