You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2018/06/04 09:57:05 UTC
Mass release due to OSGi patches
Hi folks!
Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606
I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?
There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!
How do we deal with those?
Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I still have.
Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single VOTE?
Or separate votes for each and every spec?
LieGrue,
strub
Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Everyone who does work also have a say ;)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 04.06.2018 um 15:37 schrieb Raymond Auge <ra...@liferay.com>:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO:
>
> 1. one single release
> 2. java 6 is ok
> 3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here
>
> Knowing that I don't have a say, I would gladly through my support behind all of the above.
>
> Sincerely,
> - Ray
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
>
> Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 11:57, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> Hi folks!
>
> Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606
>
> I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?
>
>
> There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!
>
> How do we deal with those?
>
> Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
> I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I still have.
>
> Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single VOTE?
> Or separate votes for each and every spec?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> --
> Raymond Augé (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc. (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance (@OSGiAlliance)
Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches
Posted by Raymond Auge <ra...@liferay.com>.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> IMHO:
>
> 1. one single release
> 2. java 6 is ok
> 3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here
>
Knowing that I don't have a say, I would gladly through my support behind
all of the above.
Sincerely,
- Ray
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 11:57, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606
>>
>> I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?
>>
>>
>> There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others
>> like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!
>>
>> How do we deal with those?
>>
>> Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
>> I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I
>> still have.
>>
>> Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one
>> single VOTE?
>> Or separate votes for each and every spec?
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
--
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
(@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
(@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
IMHO:
1. one single release
2. java 6 is ok
3. for the exclusion maybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 11:57, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> Hi folks!
>
> Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606
>
> I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right?
>
>
> There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others
> like geronimo-annotation-1.0 which are probably not used anymore at all!
>
> How do we deal with those?
>
> Release with Java8 and hope for bytecode compatibility?
> I could also run the releases with Java6, but that's the oldest jdk I
> still have.
>
> Another question: one big release with all the updates and just one single
> VOTE?
> Or separate votes for each and every spec?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>