You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by fachhoch <fa...@gmail.com> on 2010/06/23 19:31:25 UTC

broker same or seperate jvm

Please tell me when to use a seperate JVM and when to use a same JVM for my
broker ?
what is best practice ?
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/broker--same-or-seperate-jvm-tp28974704p28974704.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: broker same or seperate jvm

Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.

Generally use the same JVM if you want to co-locate with your application/service - and you want the broker to only be available at the same time as your application/service :)

cheers,

Rob
Rob Davies
follow me: http://twitter.com/rajdavies
I work here: http://fusesource.com
My Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
I'm writing this: http://www.manning.com/snyder/



On 23 Jun 2010, at 18:31, fachhoch wrote:

> 
> Please tell me when to use a seperate JVM and when to use a same JVM for my
> broker ?
> what is best practice ?
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/broker--same-or-seperate-jvm-tp28974704p28974704.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>