You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by Christian Carlow <ch...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/03 15:52:02 UTC
Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?
Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Task Type?
Currently, "Manufacturing", "Assembly", and "Sub-contracting" are the
three values available which doesn't account for inspection-only tasks.
The purpose type could just be left blank but I'm not entirely sure of
the use of the field and if its worth adding the Inspection task.
Re: Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?
Posted by Christian Carlow <ch...@gmail.com>.
Neither "ROU_ASSEMBLING", "ROU_MANUFACTURING", nor "ROU_SUBCONTRACTING"
were found to be used in any business logic. I couldn't find any
documentation about them in the DMRB either. I'll just tell the users
to leave that field blank if the task doesn't involve actual
manufacturing or assembling.
On 02/03/2014 09:15 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Christian,
>
> You could do a search on anly of the types (the
> associated workEffortPurposeTypeId) to see whether these are referenced in
> services and to evaluate what these services do.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Christian Carlow <christian.carlow@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>> Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Task Type? Currently,
>> "Manufacturing", "Assembly", and "Sub-contracting" are the three values
>> available which doesn't account for inspection-only tasks. The purpose
>> type could just be left blank but I'm not entirely sure of the use of the
>> field and if its worth adding the Inspection task.
>>
Re: Add Inspection as Routing Task Type?
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Christian,
You could do a search on anly of the types (the
associated workEffortPurposeTypeId) to see whether these are referenced in
services and to evaluate what these services do.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Christian Carlow <christian.carlow@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Does it make sense to add "Inspection" as a Routing Task Type? Currently,
> "Manufacturing", "Assembly", and "Sub-contracting" are the three values
> available which doesn't account for inspection-only tasks. The purpose
> type could just be left blank but I'm not entirely sure of the use of the
> field and if its worth adding the Inspection task.
>