You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/11/30 08:10:43 UTC
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3654) Moving
o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
Moving o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-3654
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: security
Affects Versions: 2.0.x, 2.1
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Fix For: 2.0.x, 2.1
David Jencks suggested that we move org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers package. I intend to do the following.
1. svn copy org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
2. Make org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule extend org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule.
3. Mark org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule as deprecated.
4. Change all references from org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
Does anyone see this coming in the way of compatibility? I do not intend to change the option name "org.apache.geronimo.jaas.NamedUPCredentialLoginModule.Name" as this will surely break compatibility. Whether or not the move breaks compatibility, should we consider this move only in trunk and not in branches\2.0?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3654) Moving
o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
Posted by "Joe Bohn (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-3654:
-------------------------------
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.0.2
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.0.3
> Moving o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3654
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2, 2.1
> Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Fix For: 2.0.3, 2.1
>
>
> David Jencks suggested that we move org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers package. I intend to do the following.
> 1. svn copy org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
> 2. Make org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule extend org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule.
> 3. Mark org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule as deprecated.
> 4. Change all references from org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
> Does anyone see this coming in the way of compatibility? I do not intend to change the option name "org.apache.geronimo.jaas.NamedUPCredentialLoginModule.Name" as this will surely break compatibility. Whether or not the move breaks compatibility, should we consider this move only in trunk and not in branches\2.0?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3654) Moving
o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
Posted by "Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549353 ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3654:
-----------------------------------------------
On the second thought, I am planning to skip step 2 from the above. I will mark org.apache.geronimo.jaas.NamedUPCredentialLoginModule as deprecated only. We can remove the class from the codebase after the next release.
> Moving o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3654
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 2.0.x, 2.1
> Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Fix For: 2.0.x, 2.1
>
>
> David Jencks suggested that we move org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers package. I intend to do the following.
> 1. svn copy org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
> 2. Make org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule extend org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule.
> 3. Mark org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule as deprecated.
> 4. Change all references from org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
> Does anyone see this coming in the way of compatibility? I do not intend to change the option name "org.apache.geronimo.jaas.NamedUPCredentialLoginModule.Name" as this will surely break compatibility. Whether or not the move breaks compatibility, should we consider this move only in trunk and not in branches\2.0?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3654) Moving
o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
Posted by "Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3654.
-----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 602089
o Copied o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers.NamedUsernamePasswordCredentialLoginModule
o Marked NamedUPCredentialLoginModule as deprecated
o Changed all references from o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentialLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers.NamedUsernamePasswordCredentialLoginModule
> Moving o.a.g.s.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to o.a.g.s.realm.providers
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3654
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3654
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 2.0.x, 2.1
> Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Fix For: 2.0.x, 2.1
>
>
> David Jencks suggested that we move org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers package. I intend to do the following.
> 1. svn copy org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
> 2. Make org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule extend org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule.
> 3. Mark org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule as deprecated.
> 4. Change all references from org.apache.geronmio.security.jaas.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule to org.apache.geronimo.security.realm.providers.NamedUPCredentailLoginModule
> Does anyone see this coming in the way of compatibility? I do not intend to change the option name "org.apache.geronimo.jaas.NamedUPCredentialLoginModule.Name" as this will surely break compatibility. Whether or not the move breaks compatibility, should we consider this move only in trunk and not in branches\2.0?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.