You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Chris Hofstaedter <ch...@nmwco.com> on 2006/11/17 20:57:06 UTC
Is it possible? (memory usagemanager and persistent messages)
I'd like to have an embedded broker with a demandforwardingbridge that does
not persist messages and enforces a memoryLimit against the embedded queue
but a remote broker that will persist those very same messages. Is this
possible to set up?
So far, I've been caught in a catch-22. I can get the memoryLimit to work
if I mark my messages as non-persistent but then the remote broker wont
store them such that they are available if the remote broker bounces. Or I
can get persistent messaging to work so that the messages survive the remote
broker bouncing once they get to it, but then I cant enforce the memory
limit.
I'd appreciate any insight anyone can provide....
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible---%28memory-usagemanager-and-persistent-messages%29-tf2656488.html#a7409939
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Is it possible? (memory usagemanager and persistent messages)
Posted by Chris Hofstaedter <ch...@nmwco.com>.
I had just figured this out and tested it with positive results and then
I received this response from you.
I was quite happy with myself about it until I heard it was a "quick
hack" ;)
Seriously though, is there anything wrong with this approach? It seems
to work pretty darn well.
-----Original Message-----
From: chirino@gmail.com [mailto:chirino@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 3:52 PM
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is it possible? (memory usagemanager and persistent
messages)
A quick hack would be to send messages non persitent but on the remote
broker install a BrokerPlugin that makes all messages persistent on
the send operation.
On 11/17/06, Chris Hofstaedter <ch...@nmwco.com> wrote:
>
> I'd like to have an embedded broker with a demandforwardingbridge that
does
> not persist messages and enforces a memoryLimit against the embedded
queue
> but a remote broker that will persist those very same messages. Is
this
> possible to set up?
>
> So far, I've been caught in a catch-22. I can get the memoryLimit to
work
> if I mark my messages as non-persistent but then the remote broker
wont
> store them such that they are available if the remote broker bounces.
Or I
> can get persistent messaging to work so that the messages survive the
remote
> broker bouncing once they get to it, but then I cant enforce the
memory
> limit.
>
> I'd appreciate any insight anyone can provide....
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible---%28memory-usagemanager-and-persis
tent-messages%29-tf2656488.html#a7409939
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Is it possible? (memory usagemanager and persistent messages)
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
A quick hack would be to send messages non persitent but on the remote
broker install a BrokerPlugin that makes all messages persistent on
the send operation.
On 11/17/06, Chris Hofstaedter <ch...@nmwco.com> wrote:
>
> I'd like to have an embedded broker with a demandforwardingbridge that does
> not persist messages and enforces a memoryLimit against the embedded queue
> but a remote broker that will persist those very same messages. Is this
> possible to set up?
>
> So far, I've been caught in a catch-22. I can get the memoryLimit to work
> if I mark my messages as non-persistent but then the remote broker wont
> store them such that they are available if the remote broker bounces. Or I
> can get persistent messaging to work so that the messages survive the remote
> broker bouncing once they get to it, but then I cant enforce the memory
> limit.
>
> I'd appreciate any insight anyone can provide....
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible---%28memory-usagemanager-and-persistent-messages%29-tf2656488.html#a7409939
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com