You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Bolke de Bruin <bd...@gmail.com> on 2018/08/04 18:58:18 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] AIP - Time for Airflow Improvement Proposals?
Here you go:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals
B.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
> Op 31 jul. 2018 om 06:49 heeft Tao Feng <fe...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hey Jakob,
>
> Are we going to start AIF for airflow? Currently it is a little bit hard to
> find out the proposals for different enhancement. It would be great if we
> could consolidate and put them in a central place(e.g like airflow wiki).
>
> Thanks,
> -Tao
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Chao-Han Tsai <mi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Jin Chang <ji...@lyft.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Tao Feng <fe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1, should we put them in airflow wiki space(like kafka(kip)) or google
>>> doc
>>>> or email?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Arthur Wiedmer <
>>> arthur.wiedmer@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 20:12 Maxime Beauchemin <
>>>> maximebeauchemin@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:09 PM Sid Anand <sa...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:02 PM George Leslie-Waksman
>>>>>>> <ge...@cloverhealth.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:50 AM Jakob Homan <
>> jghoman@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lots of Apache projects use ?IPs - Whatever Improvement
>>> Proposal
>>>> -
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> document and gather consensus on large changes to the code
>>> base.
>>>>>> Some
>>>>>>>>> examples:
>>>>>>>>> * Kafka Improvement Proposals (KIP) -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/
>>>>> Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
>>>>>>>>> * Flink Improvement Proposal (FLIP) -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/
>>>>> Flink+Improvement+Proposals
>>>>>>>>> * Spark Improvement Proposal (SPIP) -
>>>>>>>>> https://spark.apache.org/improvement-proposals.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We've got a few changes that have been discussed, either on
>> the
>>>>>>>>> list/JIRA (good) or in private (bad -
>>>>>>>>> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html#mailing_
>>> lists
>>>> )
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> are of a magnitude that they may benefit from some version of
>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> process. Examples:
>>>>>>>>> * The in-progress plan to refactor out connectors and
>> hooks
>>>>>>>>> (AIRFLOW-2732)
>>>>>>>>> * K8S deployment operator proposal
>>>>>>>>> * Initial Design for Supporting fine-grained Connection
>>>>> encryption
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The benefits of this approach is that the design is hosted
>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>> less ephemeral and more editable than email. It also
>> provides
>>> a
>>>>>>>>> framework for documenting and confirming consensus through
>> the
>>>>> whole
>>>>>>>>> community.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do y'all think?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Jakob
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Chao-Han Tsai
>>