You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> on 2016/07/01 03:49:15 UTC
Re: Notes on branding
All,
As a follow up to this. I've started tracking a wiki page with the results
of the audit. You can find it here:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016
There's two things I want to get out of this.
- Agreement on our branding. It seems like there's some notion that our
branding rules right now are too lenient. Do we want to require the
incubator logo? Do we want both artifacts above the fold?
- Communication to the podlings. Once all issues are identified, get the
list of issues to all offending podlings (which I'm assuming is 90% of them
right now, based on the first 18). Make sure they fix them prior to (next
release? board report?)
John
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:36 AM Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for keeping up the good work and being adamant/unwavering regarding
> the branding aspects visavis the podlings.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:36 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys
> >
> > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues.
> > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were not
> > within branding requirements.
> >
> > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlings, but I
> > went through Airflow -> Fineract, and contacted Airflow, Atlas, Beam and
> > Blur. Otherwise I'll continue to churn through contacting projects.
> >
> > John
> >
>
Re: Notes on branding
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
John,
It seems to me you just defined a (potential) solution direction.
Best regards,
Pierre
On Friday, July 1, 2016, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't
> forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some smarts that can visit the
> podling page, look at the webpage and see if the incubator logo are
> present, its going to be based on a flag in podlings.xml. I can actually
> think of a way to do it with Selenium + Sikuli instead of myself going to
> each webpage.
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:00 AM Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Hi John, All,
> >
> > My suggestion is to improve the incubator clutch, so that the overview
> > http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html reflects whether podlings are:
> >
> >
> > 1. Compliant with ASF Branding regulations
> > 2. Compliant with ASF Incubator Branding regulations.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> > OFBiz based solutions & services
> >
> > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:49 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > As a follow up to this. I've started tracking a wiki page with the
> > results
> > > of the audit. You can find it here:
> > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016
> > >
> > > There's two things I want to get out of this.
> > >
> > > - Agreement on our branding. It seems like there's some notion that
> our
> > > branding rules right now are too lenient. Do we want to require the
> > > incubator logo? Do we want both artifacts above the fold?
> > >
> > > - Communication to the podlings. Once all issues are identified, get
> the
> > > list of issues to all offending podlings (which I'm assuming is 90% of
> > them
> > > right now, based on the first 18). Make sure they fix them prior to
> > (next
> > > release? board report?)
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:36 AM Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for keeping up the good work and being adamant/unwavering
> > > regarding
> > > > the branding aspects visavis the podlings.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Pierre Smits
> > > >
> > > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> > > > OFBiz based solutions & services
> > > >
> > > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:36 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey guys
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding
> issues.
> > > > > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were
> > not
> > > > > within branding requirements.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlings,
> > > but I
> > > > > went through Airflow -> Fineract, and contacted Airflow, Atlas,
> Beam
> > > and
> > > > > Blur. Otherwise I'll continue to churn through contacting
> projects.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
Re: Notes on branding
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place. Just don't
forget, clutch isn't magic. Unless we build some smarts that can visit the
podling page, look at the webpage and see if the incubator logo are
present, its going to be based on a flag in podlings.xml. I can actually
think of a way to do it with Selenium + Sikuli instead of myself going to
each webpage.
John
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:00 AM Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi John, All,
>
> My suggestion is to improve the incubator clutch, so that the overview
> http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html reflects whether podlings are:
>
>
> 1. Compliant with ASF Branding regulations
> 2. Compliant with ASF Incubator Branding regulations.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:49 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > As a follow up to this. I've started tracking a wiki page with the
> results
> > of the audit. You can find it here:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016
> >
> > There's two things I want to get out of this.
> >
> > - Agreement on our branding. It seems like there's some notion that our
> > branding rules right now are too lenient. Do we want to require the
> > incubator logo? Do we want both artifacts above the fold?
> >
> > - Communication to the podlings. Once all issues are identified, get the
> > list of issues to all offending podlings (which I'm assuming is 90% of
> them
> > right now, based on the first 18). Make sure they fix them prior to
> (next
> > release? board report?)
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:36 AM Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > Thanks for keeping up the good work and being adamant/unwavering
> > regarding
> > > the branding aspects visavis the podlings.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Pierre Smits
> > >
> > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> > > OFBiz based solutions & services
> > >
> > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:36 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey guys
> > > >
> > > > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues.
> > > > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were
> not
> > > > within branding requirements.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlings,
> > but I
> > > > went through Airflow -> Fineract, and contacted Airflow, Atlas, Beam
> > and
> > > > Blur. Otherwise I'll continue to churn through contacting projects.
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Notes on branding
Posted by Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi John, All,
My suggestion is to improve the incubator clutch, so that the overview
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html reflects whether podlings are:
1. Compliant with ASF Branding regulations
2. Compliant with ASF Incubator Branding regulations.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:49 AM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> As a follow up to this. I've started tracking a wiki page with the results
> of the audit. You can find it here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016
>
> There's two things I want to get out of this.
>
> - Agreement on our branding. It seems like there's some notion that our
> branding rules right now are too lenient. Do we want to require the
> incubator logo? Do we want both artifacts above the fold?
>
> - Communication to the podlings. Once all issues are identified, get the
> list of issues to all offending podlings (which I'm assuming is 90% of them
> right now, based on the first 18). Make sure they fix them prior to (next
> release? board report?)
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:36 AM Pierre Smits <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for keeping up the good work and being adamant/unwavering
> regarding
> > the branding aspects visavis the podlings.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> > OFBiz based solutions & services
> >
> > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:36 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey guys
> > >
> > > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding issues.
> > > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were not
> > > within branding requirements.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlings,
> but I
> > > went through Airflow -> Fineract, and contacted Airflow, Atlas, Beam
> and
> > > Blur. Otherwise I'll continue to churn through contacting projects.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> >
>