You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Andrew Westberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/09/17 18:42:40 UTC
[jira] Created: (AMQNET-285) Error in
FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
Error in FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
-----------------------------------------
Key: AMQNET-285
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-285
Project: ActiveMQ .Net
Issue Type: Bug
Components: NMS
Reporter: Andrew Westberg
Assignee: Jim Gomes
Around line 1148 in FailoverTransport.cs, there is the following code:
if(backups.Count < BackupPoolSize)
{
break;
}
In the Java code in FailoverTransport.java, there is a loop that has the opposite effect as the C# code.
for (Iterator<URI> iter = connectList.iterator(); iter.hasNext() && backups.size() < backupPoolSize;) {
In Java, we STAY IN the loop as long as we haven't filled up the backups collection. In C#, we're incorrectly BAILING OUT if we haven't filled up the collection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (AMQNET-285) Error in
FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
Posted by "Jim Gomes (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jim Gomes updated AMQNET-285:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.4.1
> Error in FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQNET-285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-285
> Project: ActiveMQ .Net
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: NMS
> Reporter: Andrew Westberg
> Assignee: Jim Gomes
> Fix For: 1.4.1
>
>
> Around line 1148 in FailoverTransport.cs, there is the following code:
> if(backups.Count < BackupPoolSize)
> {
> break;
> }
> In the Java code in FailoverTransport.java, there is a loop that has the opposite effect as the C# code.
> for (Iterator<URI> iter = connectList.iterator(); iter.hasNext() && backups.size() < backupPoolSize;) {
> In Java, we STAY IN the loop as long as we haven't filled up the backups collection. In C#, we're incorrectly BAILING OUT if we haven't filled up the collection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (AMQNET-285) Error in
FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
Posted by "Timothy Bish (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Timothy Bish resolved AMQNET-285.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk and the 1.4.x fixes branch
> Error in FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQNET-285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-285
> Project: ActiveMQ .Net
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: NMS
> Reporter: Andrew Westberg
> Assignee: Timothy Bish
> Fix For: 1.4.1
>
>
> Around line 1148 in FailoverTransport.cs, there is the following code:
> if(backups.Count < BackupPoolSize)
> {
> break;
> }
> In the Java code in FailoverTransport.java, there is a loop that has the opposite effect as the C# code.
> for (Iterator<URI> iter = connectList.iterator(); iter.hasNext() && backups.size() < backupPoolSize;) {
> In Java, we STAY IN the loop as long as we haven't filled up the backups collection. In C#, we're incorrectly BAILING OUT if we haven't filled up the collection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (AMQNET-285) Error in
FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
Posted by "Timothy Bish (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Timothy Bish reassigned AMQNET-285:
-----------------------------------
Assignee: Timothy Bish (was: Jim Gomes)
> Error in FailoverTransport.BuildBackups()
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQNET-285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQNET-285
> Project: ActiveMQ .Net
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: NMS
> Reporter: Andrew Westberg
> Assignee: Timothy Bish
> Fix For: 1.4.1
>
>
> Around line 1148 in FailoverTransport.cs, there is the following code:
> if(backups.Count < BackupPoolSize)
> {
> break;
> }
> In the Java code in FailoverTransport.java, there is a loop that has the opposite effect as the C# code.
> for (Iterator<URI> iter = connectList.iterator(); iter.hasNext() && backups.size() < backupPoolSize;) {
> In Java, we STAY IN the loop as long as we haven't filled up the backups collection. In C#, we're incorrectly BAILING OUT if we haven't filled up the collection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.