You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@curator.apache.org by "Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/12/22 17:59:58 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (CURATOR-369) Improve log format in
EnsembleTracker.processConfigData()
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15770667#comment-15770667 ]
Jordan Zimmerman edited comment on CURATOR-369 at 12/22/16 5:59 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
[~sylvain@apache.org] - Curator has two concurrent versions: {{master}} and {{CURATOR\-3.0}} (see here: http://curator.apache.org regarding "Versions"). So, for this, branch off of {{CURATOR\-3.0}}.
was (Author: randgalt):
[~sylvain@apache.org] - Curator has two concurrent versions: {{master}} and {{CURATOR-3.0}} (see here: http://curator.apache.org regarding "Versions"). So, for this, branch off of {{CURATOR-3.0}}.
> Improve log format in EnsembleTracker.processConfigData()
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-369
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-369
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Framework
> Affects Versions: 3.2.1
> Reporter: Sylvain Wallez
> Priority: Minor
>
> EnsembleFrameworkTracker has a [log statement|https://github.com/apache/curator/blob/CURATOR-3.0/curator-framework/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/imps/EnsembleTracker.java#L182] that doesn't format its value correctly and is adding noise in log files.
> Sample output of this statement is as follows:
> {noformat}
> [2016-12-09 12:16:26,046][INFO ][org.apache.curator.framework.imps.EnsembleTracker][] New config event received: [115, 101, 114, 118, 101, 114, 46, 49, 48, 61, 108, 111, 99, 97, 108, 104, 111, 115, 116, 58, 50, 56, 57, 56, 58, 51, 56, 57, 56, 58, 112, 97, 114, 116, 105, 99, 105, 112, 97, 110, 116, 59, 48, 46, 48, 46, 48, 46, 48, 58, 50, 49, 57, 49, 10, 118, 101, 114, 115, 105, 111, 110, 61, 49, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48, 48]
> {noformat}
> I'd like to provide a fix for this by logging the properties object once it's been parsed, but I'm confused about what branch to patch against. This class exists in the CURATOR-3.0 branch, but not in master.
> Is creating a PR against the CURATOR-3.0 branch the way to go?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)