You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@buildr.apache.org by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com> on 2009/04/20 19:31:24 UTC
1.3.4 release
Guys,
The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still volunteering
to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
alex
Re: 1.3.4 release
Posted by Victor Hugo Borja <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1 :)
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Alexis Midon <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for a release asap.
> we're using 1.3.4-snapshot everyday, it's stable enough to be released
> imho.
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't know how people feel about this specifically but I wouldn't mind
> > doing a 1.3.4 now and a 1.3.5 sooner with JRuby 1.2.0 support rather than
> > waiting longer for 1.3.4.
> >
> > More frequent releases can't be bad for the project at this point (with
> > moderation, of course)
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm using Buildr on JRuby 1.2.0. Aside from the `system` issue and the
> > > need
> > > to install each of the dependent gems one at a time, everything works
> > just
> > > dandy. What problems are you seeing?
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Victor Hugo Borja <
> vic.borja@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while
> > > > testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are
> > getting
> > > > those errors, please go for it.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <
> boisvert@intalio.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still
> > > > volunteering
> > > > > to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
> > > > >
> > > > > alex
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > vic
> > > >
> > > > Quaerendo invenietis.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
vic
Quaerendo invenietis.
Re: 1.3.4 release
Posted by Alexis Midon <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 for a release asap.
we're using 1.3.4-snapshot everyday, it's stable enough to be released imho.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com> wrote:
> I don't know how people feel about this specifically but I wouldn't mind
> doing a 1.3.4 now and a 1.3.5 sooner with JRuby 1.2.0 support rather than
> waiting longer for 1.3.4.
>
> More frequent releases can't be bad for the project at this point (with
> moderation, of course)
>
> alex
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm using Buildr on JRuby 1.2.0. Aside from the `system` issue and the
> > need
> > to install each of the dependent gems one at a time, everything works
> just
> > dandy. What problems are you seeing?
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Victor Hugo Borja <vic.borja@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while
> > > testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are
> getting
> > > those errors, please go for it.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still
> > > volunteering
> > > > to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > alex
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > vic
> > >
> > > Quaerendo invenietis.
> > >
> >
>
Re: 1.3.4 release
Posted by Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>.
+1 The current trunk has a fair number of improvements over 1.3.3 and no
outstanding issues that I am aware of.
Daniel
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't know how people feel about this specifically but I wouldn't mind
> > doing a 1.3.4 now and a 1.3.5 sooner with JRuby 1.2.0 support rather than
> > waiting longer for 1.3.4.
>
>
> +1 for making a 1.3.4 release.
>
> Assaf
>
>
> >
> >
> > More frequent releases can't be bad for the project at this point (with
> > moderation, of course)
> >
> > alex
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm using Buildr on JRuby 1.2.0. Aside from the `system` issue and the
> > > need
> > > to install each of the dependent gems one at a time, everything works
> > just
> > > dandy. What problems are you seeing?
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Victor Hugo Borja <
> vic.borja@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while
> > > > testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are
> > getting
> > > > those errors, please go for it.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <
> boisvert@intalio.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Guys,
> > > > >
> > > > > The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still
> > > > volunteering
> > > > > to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
> > > > >
> > > > > alex
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > vic
> > > >
> > > > Quaerendo invenietis.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: 1.3.4 release
Posted by Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com>.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com> wrote:
> I don't know how people feel about this specifically but I wouldn't mind
> doing a 1.3.4 now and a 1.3.5 sooner with JRuby 1.2.0 support rather than
> waiting longer for 1.3.4.
+1 for making a 1.3.4 release.
Assaf
>
>
> More frequent releases can't be bad for the project at this point (with
> moderation, of course)
>
> alex
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm using Buildr on JRuby 1.2.0. Aside from the `system` issue and the
> > need
> > to install each of the dependent gems one at a time, everything works
> just
> > dandy. What problems are you seeing?
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Victor Hugo Borja <vic.borja@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while
> > > testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are
> getting
> > > those errors, please go for it.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Guys,
> > > >
> > > > The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still
> > > volunteering
> > > > to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > alex
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > vic
> > >
> > > Quaerendo invenietis.
> > >
> >
>
Re: 1.3.4 release
Posted by Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>.
I don't know how people feel about this specifically but I wouldn't mind
doing a 1.3.4 now and a 1.3.5 sooner with JRuby 1.2.0 support rather than
waiting longer for 1.3.4.
More frequent releases can't be bad for the project at this point (with
moderation, of course)
alex
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using Buildr on JRuby 1.2.0. Aside from the `system` issue and the
> need
> to install each of the dependent gems one at a time, everything works just
> dandy. What problems are you seeing?
>
> Daniel
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Victor Hugo Borja <vic.borja@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while
> > testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are getting
> > those errors, please go for it.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still
> > volunteering
> > > to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
> > >
> > > alex
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > vic
> >
> > Quaerendo invenietis.
> >
>
Re: 1.3.4 release
Posted by Daniel Spiewak <dj...@gmail.com>.
I'm using Buildr on JRuby 1.2.0. Aside from the `system` issue and the need
to install each of the dependent gems one at a time, everything works just
dandy. What problems are you seeing?
Daniel
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Victor Hugo Borja <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while
> testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are getting
> those errors, please go for it.
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <boisvert@intalio.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still
> volunteering
> > to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
> >
> > alex
> >
>
>
>
> --
> vic
>
> Quaerendo invenietis.
>
Re: 1.3.4 release
Posted by Victor Hugo Borja <vi...@gmail.com>.
I'm sorry, I haven't had time to fix those jruby problems I had while
testing with jruby 1.2.0 on my local repo. But if no one else are getting
those errors, please go for it.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Alex Boisvert <bo...@intalio.com>wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The 1.3.4 release is now long overdue... Victor are you still volunteering
> to do it? If not, I can get started tomorrow.
>
> alex
>
--
vic
Quaerendo invenietis.