You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tuscany.apache.org by lr...@apache.org on 2009/03/09 23:39:05 UTC
svn commit: r751885 - /tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/
Author: lresende
Date: Mon Mar 9 22:39:04 2009
New Revision: 751885
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=751885&view=rev
Log:
2.0-M1 Final Release Tag
Added:
tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/ (props changed)
- copied from r751884, tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1-RC3/
Propchange: tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- svn:ignore (added)
+++ svn:ignore Mon Mar 9 22:39:04 2009
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+target
+*.iws
+*.ipr
+*.iml
+.project
+.classpath
+derby.log
+maven.log
+velocity.log*
+junit*.properties
+surefire*.properties
+.settings
+.deployables
+.wtpmodules
+.externalToolBuilders
+maven-eclipse.xml
+Maven_Ant_Builder.launch
+
+
Propchange: tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
svn:mergeinfo = /tuscany/branches/sca-java-1.3:671193
Re: svn commit: r751885 - /tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Interesting. Is there a particular reason why old release candidates are
>
> maintained in svn? Why not delete the RC's? E.g. 2.0-M1-RC1, RC2, and RC3? I
>
> find them confusing, when searching for a tag...
>
> I don't have any particular reason, I guess I'm just following some
> pattern done in the past.
fyi, I've just deleted most of the old RC tags for the SCA releases.
...ant
Re: svn commit: r751885 - /tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Kevan Miller
> <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Interesting. Is there a particular reason why old release
>> candidates are
>> maintained in svn? Why not delete the RC's? E.g. 2.0-M1-RC1, RC2,
>> and RC3? I
>> find them confusing, when searching for a tag...
>
> I don't have any particular reason, I guess I'm just following some
> pattern done in the past.
> BTW, I do think our SVN structure is quite a mess, and maybe we should
> look at how we could improve on that area.
:D
Heh. I was saving that topic for a rainy day... The structure is quite
a mess.
--kevan
Re: svn commit: r751885 - /tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting. Is there a particular reason why old release candidates are
> maintained in svn? Why not delete the RC's? E.g. 2.0-M1-RC1, RC2, and RC3? I
> find them confusing, when searching for a tag...
I don't have any particular reason, I guess I'm just following some
pattern done in the past.
BTW, I do think our SVN structure is quite a mess, and maybe we should
look at how we could improve on that area.
> --kevan
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: svn commit: r751885 - /tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Mar 9, 2009, at 6:39 PM, lresende@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lresende
> Date: Mon Mar 9 22:39:04 2009
> New Revision: 751885
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=751885&view=rev
> Log:
> 2.0-M1 Final Release Tag
>
> Added:
> tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1/ (props changed)
> - copied from r751884, tuscany/tags/java/sca/2.0-M1-RC3/
Interesting. Is there a particular reason why old release candidates
are maintained in svn? Why not delete the RC's? E.g. 2.0-M1-RC1, RC2,
and RC3? I find them confusing, when searching for a tag...
--kevan