You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Stephan Ewen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/02/05 13:40:34 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (FLINK-1442) Archived Execution Graph consumes too much memory

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Stephan Ewen resolved FLINK-1442.
---------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 0.9

Fixed via 9d181a86a0870204113271b6e45f611cba04fc7d and 8ae0dc2d768aecfa3129df553f43d827792b65d7

> Archived Execution Graph consumes too much memory
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-1442
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1442
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JobManager
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>            Reporter: Stephan Ewen
>            Assignee: Max Michels
>             Fix For: 0.9
>
>
> The JobManager archives the execution graphs, for analysis of jobs. The graphs may consume a lot of memory.
> Especially the execution edges in all2all connection patterns are extremely many and add up in memory consumption.
> The execution edges connect all parallel tasks. So for a all2all pattern between n and m tasks, there are n*m edges. For parallelism of multiple 100 tasks, this can easily reach 100k objects and more, each with a set of metadata.
> I propose the following to solve that:
> 1.  Clear all execution edges from the graph (majority of the memory consumers) when it is given to the archiver.
> 2. Have the map/list of the archived graphs behind a soft reference, to it will be removed under memory pressure before the JVM crashes. That may remove graphs from the history early, but is much preferable to the JVM crashing, in which case the graph is lost as well...
> 3. Long term: The graph should be archived somewhere else. Somthing like the History server used by Hadoop and Hive would be a good idea.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)