[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-1695) Inconsistent error code and type for new errors introduced by dynamic reconfiguration

["Alexander Shraer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13792804#comment-13792804 ] 

Alexander Shraer commented on ZOOKEEPER-1695:
---------------------------------------------

You mean the fact that the error number is > 100 ? I don't think that the numeric value of the error has any significance, is this described anywhere ? For example EphemeralOnLocalSession was just added after reconfig errors with the value 122. 

The comment there says

 /** This interface contains the original static final int constants
     * which have now been replaced with an enumeration in Code. 
 

> Inconsistent error code and type for new errors introduced by dynamic reconfiguration  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-1695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1695
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Thawan Kooburat
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>
> From KeeperException.Code, RECONFIGINPROGRESS and NEWCONFIGNOQUORUM are declared as system errors. However, their error code suggested that they are API errors. 
> We either need to move it to the right type or use the code from the right range



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)