You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by "Ayres, David" <DA...@lear.com> on 2004/03/02 16:07:58 UTC
Visual Studio.Net and Subversion?
I read here
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/SearchList?list=users&searchText=visua
l+studio&defaultField=subject&Search=Search
<http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/SearchList?list=users&searchText=visu
al+studio&defaultField=subject&Search=Search> that there's a problem with
Subversion using a "." before the svn directory for Visual Studio.Net users.
Is this still a problem, has it been resolved? Why can't the creators of
this software just NOT use the "." before the directory name? What's the
point in having the "." there? This obviously causes a lot of problems with
Visual Studio.Net. I guess that the "." is needed for some other purpose?
Please forgive my ignorance, my teammate and I are just trying to figure
this out.
It's too bad because your product, when I can use in conjunction with my
programming tool, is really great. It's better than great, it's awesome!
But this small issue causes some headaches.
Thanks,
David
**********************
** LEGAL DISCLAIMER **
**********************
This E-mail message and any attachments may contain
legally privileged, confidential or proprietary
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s),
or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of
this message to the intended recipient(s), you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this E-mail message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this E-mail message from your computer.
Re: Visual Studio.Net and Subversion?
Posted by John Peacock <jp...@rowman.com>.
Ayres, David wrote:
> that there's a problem with Subversion using a "." before the svn
> directory for Visual Studio.Net users. Is this still a problem, has it
> been resolved? Why can't the creators of this software just NOT use the
> "." before the directory name? What's the point in having the "."
> there? This obviously causes a lot of problems with Visual Studio.Net.
The problem is that Visual Studio.Net has arbitrary problems with directory
names with only an extension; it ultimately comes from M$oft's use of the file
extension to denote file type. The fault is with M$loth, but no one is
expecting them to fix it.
The problem has a few work-arounds, but none were judged worth holding up 1.0.0
for, since it only affects Win32 users and then only those using VS.NET.
Notwithstanding M$oft's marketing efforts, .NET is not the only development
platform.
FYI, a leading '.' on a file/directory name makes it hidden under Unix. Win32
uses a flag in the filesystem to hide files/directories. By having a consistent
naming convention, it is possible to copy a working copy from Unix to Win32 (a
feature I personally find to be of little practical use).
I expect that this particular difficulty will be fixed sooner, rather than
later, probably as part of 1.1.0 (but don't quote me! I'm just a user not a
developer ;~).
HTH
John
--
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org