You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net> on 2001/12/13 01:04:11 UTC
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
aaron@apache.org writes:
> aaron 01/12/12 15:56:46
>
> Modified: server mpm_common.c
> . CHANGES
> Log:
> Fix a bug in how we select the IP for the POD to connect to for dummy
> connects (dislodging a doomed child from the accept mutex). No longer
> do we assume that the child is listening to 127.0.0.1, but instead
> we just pick the first hostname/port from the listen rec.
shazayum!
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:04:11PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > aaron@apache.org writes:
> >
> > > aaron 01/12/12 15:56:46
> > >
> > > Modified: server mpm_common.c
> > > . CHANGES
> > > Log:
> > > Fix a bug in how we select the IP for the POD to connect to for dummy
> > > connects (dislodging a doomed child from the accept mutex). No longer
> > > do we assume that the child is listening to 127.0.0.1, but instead
> > > we just pick the first hostname/port from the listen rec.
> >
> > shazayum!
>
> Is that a good or a bad reaction? ;)
bewilderment at finding out we had such a bug
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:04:11PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> aaron@apache.org writes:
>
> > aaron 01/12/12 15:56:46
> >
> > Modified: server mpm_common.c
> > . CHANGES
> > Log:
> > Fix a bug in how we select the IP for the POD to connect to for dummy
> > connects (dislodging a doomed child from the accept mutex). No longer
> > do we assume that the child is listening to 127.0.0.1, but instead
> > we just pick the first hostname/port from the listen rec.
>
> shazayum!
Is that a good or a bad reaction? ;)
-aaron