You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@eagle.apache.org by Edward Zhang <yo...@apache.org> on 2016/10/13 03:12:48 UTC
[DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Hi Eagle Community,
It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we last
time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart
discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
Some documents and data are as follows:
1. Maturity assessment,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
3. Four new committers were added since incubation
4. Two releases are made
5. >600 Jira tickets,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=project%20%3D%20EAGLE
6. ~500 pull requests.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
Thanks
Edward
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
> Hi Jijun,
>
> Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We appreciate it.
>
> Best regards
> Jing
>
> On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <ta...@yhd.com>
> wrote:
>
> Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for community with
> these improvement.
>
> Best Wishes
>
> 唐觊隽
> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
>
> Hi Jijun,
>
> Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We have been
> working on that since we got your email. Now:
>
> 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be stable and
> build will be successful.
> 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user and
> developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a. Development
> Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc. can be
> found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
>
> Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution to the
> Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We really
> appreciate it.
>
> Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your thoughts.
>
> Best regards
> Jing
>
> On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html
> is
> updated with new content, please review if it conforms to what we
> expected.
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <mc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi mentors,
> >
> > I will update security page content taking the mentioned aspects.
> >
> > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps that you
> feel eagle
> > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to point issues
> out and we
> > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation requires.
> Thanks.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects do not
> have a
> >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities should be
> reported to
> >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka seems a
> good model
> >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> >>
> >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> >>
> >>
> >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me, though I
> haven't delved
> >> deep into it.
> >> >
> >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a security-related
> product I
> >> would expect there to be a well-defined process/protocol that
> ensured
> >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched, CVE
> process, etc.
> >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during incubation,
> but should be
> >> prepared for them after graduation.
> >> >
> >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for understanding what
> is expected
> >> from an ASF standpoint.
> >> >
> >> > -Taylor
> >> >
> >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
> >> >
> >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podli
> >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> >> >>
> >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA
> (listed in
> >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do not seem
> >> appropriate places to report security issues, because they are
> public. Is a
> >> private channel needed?
> >> >>
> >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> >> >>
> >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready to
> graduate. The
> >> community should start taking steps to graduate, including
> agreeing bylaws
> >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an
> initial PMC chair,
> >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a vote
> thread.
> >> >>
> >> >> Julian
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can remove
> that once
> >> after
> >> >>> they are reviewed.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks
> >> >>> Edward
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <ha...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling Maturity
> Assessment".
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Eagle community,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help
> review and
> >> comment?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> - Hao
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki page
> for
> >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> Podlin
> >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> >> >>>>> .
> >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable judgement
> and
> >> >>>> instructions.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model values
> and
> >> inspects, and
> >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page, personally,
> I think
> >> Eagle
> >> >>>> is
> >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing the
> right way
> >> towards
> >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for the
> all
> >> resolved
> >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that we're
> striving to
> >> work
> >> >>>> on
> >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item marked as
> "NOT APPLY"
> >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not fitting
> for eagle,
> >> >>>> could
> >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> >> >>>>> <
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> Podlin
> >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as all
> we made or
> >> will
> >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right way. :)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Michael
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> hao@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation discussion
> for Eagle.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how to run
> an open
> >> source
> >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating) is now
> open to be
> >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> organizations
> >> including
> >> >>>> but
> >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian, etc.
> The
> >> community
> >> >>>>> has
> >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself by
> sharing and
> >> talking
> >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> conferences like
> >> Hadoop
> >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London,
> Dublin, Shanghai,
> >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the
> community has
> >> >>>>> successfully
> >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing v0.5.0
> following
> >> >>>> apache
> >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to graduate,
> right now
> >> the
> >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling
> Maturity
> >> >>>> Assessment"
> >> >>>>> to
> >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may remain
> before
> >> >>>> graduation,
> >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> - Hao
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is healthy
> in terms
> >> of
> >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I don't
> think technical
> >> >>>>> issues
> >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> >> >>>>>>>> Because
> >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai
> (201203)
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:yonzhang2012@apache.org]
> >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will go
> through
> >> >>>> maturity
> >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde <
> jhyde@apache.org>
> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other contributors.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by Edward Zhang <yo...@apache.org>.
Thanks all for valuable feedback. We will work with our mentors to execute
the steps towards graduation. Cheers!
Thanks
Edward
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Zhao Qingwen <qi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Since last Oct, Eagle has grown a lot in all aspects described in Apache
> Project Maturity Model. It also accepts 4+ new committers and multiple
> other organizations also actively participate in the new feature
> development.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Qingwen Zhao | 赵晴雯
>
>
>
>
> 2016-10-18 11:53 GMT+08:00 Jilin <ji...@apache.org>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Eagle have a great process during this year. And it's also important to
> the
> > Hadoop ecosphere.
> > - Committer well follow the jira & PR process.
> > - Release the stable version.
> > - Keep updating the project.
> >
> > I think it's time for graduation.
> >
> > 2016-10-18 11:34 GMT+08:00 Hao Chen <ha...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Very glad to hear that Eagle is infinitely closing to graduate at a
> > > top-level project since entering incubator at Oct 26th, 2016.
> > >
> > > In the past one year, the eagle community has always keep learning,
> > growing
> > > and practicing apache way every where and every day:
> > >
> > > - Meritocracy
> > > - Peer to Peer
> > > - Consensus decision making
> > > - Open, online communication
> > > - Responsible oversight
> > >
> > > Until now (10/26/2015 ~ 10/18/2016), eagle community has grown very
> fast
> > in
> > > features, code quality, community, consensus building etc.
> > >
> > > - Reached a very high maturity level: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment>
> > > - Added *4+* new committers and *20+* contributors from different
> > > organizations around the world side
> > > - Successfully released *2* major versions and some minor versions,
> > > resolved *632+* jira tickets and *577+* pull requests.
> > > - *5+* public originations (e.g. eBay, Paypal, Yihaodian, Dataguise,
> > > etc.) are using or adopting eagle to monitor their hadoop clusters.
> > > - Shared eagle and apache way in *10+* tech conferences in* 8+
> > > *different
> > > cities around the world (e.g. Hadoop Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon,
> > etc.)
> > >
> > > - Hao
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Michael Wu <mw...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > - 2 releases have been made and committers have summed lots of
> > > experience
> > > > of the releasing process.
> > > > - More and more contributions are received from the community.
> > > > - JIRA tickets are all with detailed descriptions.
> > > > - PRs follow a good way of collaboration.
> > > > - The project is being established in the industry.
> > > > - Responses are made timely to requesters.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Liangfei.Su <su...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed.
> > > > > JIRA with clear comments.
> > > > > PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache
> naming.
> > > This
> > > > > keeps clear commit history and friendly comments.
> > > > > Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join
> > in.
> > > > > Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community
> easier
> > > to
> > > > > involve in.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Ralph
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Vote +1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are more and more contributors and they are making great
> > > > > > contributions to Apache Eagle.
> > > > > > Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use
> > > eagle
> > > > > > system.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other
> > > > > corporations
> > > > > > to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more
> > > powerful.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will
> be
> > > > > better.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Jinhu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <
> daveloperzhou@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vote +1.
> > > > > > > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process
> has
> > > been
> > > > > > made
> > > > > > > since last discussion:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle
> has
> > > > > become
> > > > > > > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management
> > > through
> > > > > > Eagle
> > > > > > > UI.)
> > > > > > > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more
> > > stable
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > robust.
> > > > > > > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on
> > daily
> > > > > > > discussion happened in the emails.
> > > > > > > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different
> > corporations
> > > > and
> > > > > > > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg,
> > > Yahoo
> > > > > > News)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Da
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Eagle Community,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved
> since
> > > we
> > > > > last
> > > > > > > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we
> > > restart
> > > > > > > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > > > > > > > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > Documentation
> > > > > > > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > > > > > > > 4. Two releases are made
> > > > > > > > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> > > > > > > project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > > > > > > > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%
> > > > > > E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > Edward
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution.
> We
> > > > > > appreciate
> > > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > > > Jing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <
> > > > > > tangjijun@yhd.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache
> > Eagle.
> > > > > > > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for
> > > > community
> > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > these improvement.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best Wishes
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 唐觊隽
> > > > > > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > > > > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai
> (201203)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > > > > > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > > > > > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang
> > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > > > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves.
> > We
> > > > have
> > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will
> > be
> > > > > stable
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > build will be successful.
> > > > > > > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > > > > > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let
> > user
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on
> them
> > a.
> > > > > > > > Development
> > > > > > > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > > > > > > Development+Guide
> > > > > > > > > b. Product features introduction
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > > > > > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design,
> > > etc.
> > > > > can
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your
> > > contribution
> > > > to
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We
> > > > really
> > > > > > > > > appreciate it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your
> > > > > thoughts.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > > > Jing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > > > > > > > org/sup/index.html
> > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > updated with new content, please review if it
> > conforms
> > > to
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > > expected.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> > > > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi mentors,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I will update security page content taking the
> > > > mentioned
> > > > > > > > aspects.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other
> > gaps
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > feel eagle
> > > > > > > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free
> to
> > > > point
> > > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > > > out and we
> > > > > > > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what
> graduation
> > > > > > requires.
> > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most
> > > projects
> > > > do
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > have a
> > > > > > > > > >> security team[1], which means that
> vulnerabilities
> > > > > should
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > reported to
> > > > > > > > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do,
> > Kafka
> > > > > > seems a
> > > > > > > > > good model
> > > > > > > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and
> > clear[2].
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/
> security/projects.html
> > <
> > > > > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/
> project-security.html
> > <
> > > > > > > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > > > > > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to
> me,
> > > > > though I
> > > > > > > > > haven't delved
> > > > > > > > > >> deep into it.
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> > > > > > > security-related
> > > > > > > > > product I
> > > > > > > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined
> > > > process/protocol
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > ensured
> > > > > > > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until
> > > patched,
> > > > > CVE
> > > > > > > > > process, etc.
> > > > > > > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues
> during
> > > > > > > incubation,
> > > > > > > > > but should be
> > > > > > > > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for
> > > > understanding
> > > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > > is expected
> > > > > > > > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > -Taylor
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > > > > > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/
> > > security/committers.html
> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > > > > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > <
> > > > > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > uence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > Podli
> > > > > > > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list
> > and
> > > > JIRA
> > > > > > > > > (listed in
> > > > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> org/sup/index.html
> > <
> > > > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> org/sup/index.html
> > >)
> > > do
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > seem
> > > > > > > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues,
> > > because
> > > > > they
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > public. Is a
> > > > > > > > > >> private channel needed?
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle
> is
> > > > ready
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > graduate. The
> > > > > > > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate,
> > > > > including
> > > > > > > > > agreeing bylaws
> > > > > > > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary),
> > > choosing
> > > > an
> > > > > > > > > initial PMC chair,
> > > > > > > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and
> > starting
> > > a
> > > > > vote
> > > > > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >> Julian
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > > > > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and
> we
> > > can
> > > > > > > remove
> > > > > > > > > that once
> > > > > > > > > >> after
> > > > > > > > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >> >>> Edward
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > > > > hao@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle
> > Podling
> > > > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > > > > Assessment".
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC)
> > please
> > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > review and
> > > > > > > > > >> comment?
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael
> Wu
> > <
> > > > > > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we
> > created a
> > > > > wiki
> > > > > > > page
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> .
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your
> > > valuable
> > > > > > > > judgement
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the
> > > model
> > > > > > > values
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > >> inspects, and
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki
> > page,
> > > > > > > > personally,
> > > > > > > > > I think
> > > > > > > > > >> Eagle
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> is
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and
> is
> > > > facing
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > right way
> > > > > > > > > >> towards
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong,
> thanks)
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK"
> > > stands
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > >> resolved
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2
> items
> > > that
> > > > > > we're
> > > > > > > > > striving to
> > > > > > > > > >> work
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> on
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1
> > item
> > > > > > marked
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model
> > seems
> > > > not
> > > > > > > > fitting
> > > > > > > > > for eagle,
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> could
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule
> RE40
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> <
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#
> > > EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment
> > > > > -RE40
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be
> > > appreciated,
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > > we made or
> > > > > > > > > >> will
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the
> > > right
> > > > > > way.
> > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao
> Chen
> > <
> > > > > > > > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up
> graduation
> > > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > > for Eagle.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully
> understand
> > > how
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > run
> > > > > > > > > an open
> > > > > > > > > >> source
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle
> > > > (incubating)
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > now
> > > > > > > > > open to be
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of
> > different
> > > > > > > > > organizations
> > > > > > > > > >> including
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> but
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides,
> > > > > Yihaodian,
> > > > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > >> community
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> has
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding
> > > itself
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > sharing and
> > > > > > > > > >> talking
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in
> > international
> > > > > > > > > conferences like
> > > > > > > > > >> Hadoop
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose,
> > > > London,
> > > > > > > > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups.
> And
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > community has
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively
> > > > preparing
> > > > > > > v0.5.0
> > > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> apache
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready
> > to
> > > > > > > graduate,
> > > > > > > > > right now
> > > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an
> "Eagle
> > > > > Podling
> > > > > > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> to
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what
> tasks
> > > may
> > > > > > remain
> > > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P.
> Taylor
> > > > > Goetz <
> > > > > > > > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a
> > podling
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > healthy
> > > > > > > > > in terms
> > > > > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making
> > releases. I
> > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > think technical
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > > > > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to
> graduate.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture -
> Fundation,
> > > Tech
> > > > > > Dept
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang,
> > > > > Shanghai
> > > > > > > > > (201203)
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:
> > > > yonzhang2012@apache.
> > > > > > org]
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to
> > > graduate?
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the
> list,
> > > and
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > go
> > > > > > > > > through
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM,
> Julian
> > > > Hyde <
> > > > > > > > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with
> other
> > > > > > > > contributors.
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this
> list?
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by Zhao Qingwen <qi...@gmail.com>.
+1
Since last Oct, Eagle has grown a lot in all aspects described in Apache
Project Maturity Model. It also accepts 4+ new committers and multiple
other organizations also actively participate in the new feature
development.
Best Regards,
Qingwen Zhao | 赵晴雯
2016-10-18 11:53 GMT+08:00 Jilin <ji...@apache.org>:
> +1
>
> Eagle have a great process during this year. And it's also important to the
> Hadoop ecosphere.
> - Committer well follow the jira & PR process.
> - Release the stable version.
> - Keep updating the project.
>
> I think it's time for graduation.
>
> 2016-10-18 11:34 GMT+08:00 Hao Chen <ha...@apache.org>:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Very glad to hear that Eagle is infinitely closing to graduate at a
> > top-level project since entering incubator at Oct 26th, 2016.
> >
> > In the past one year, the eagle community has always keep learning,
> growing
> > and practicing apache way every where and every day:
> >
> > - Meritocracy
> > - Peer to Peer
> > - Consensus decision making
> > - Open, online communication
> > - Responsible oversight
> >
> > Until now (10/26/2015 ~ 10/18/2016), eagle community has grown very fast
> in
> > features, code quality, community, consensus building etc.
> >
> > - Reached a very high maturity level: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > Podling+Maturity+Assessment>
> > - Added *4+* new committers and *20+* contributors from different
> > organizations around the world side
> > - Successfully released *2* major versions and some minor versions,
> > resolved *632+* jira tickets and *577+* pull requests.
> > - *5+* public originations (e.g. eBay, Paypal, Yihaodian, Dataguise,
> > etc.) are using or adopting eagle to monitor their hadoop clusters.
> > - Shared eagle and apache way in *10+* tech conferences in* 8+
> > *different
> > cities around the world (e.g. Hadoop Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon,
> etc.)
> >
> > - Hao
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Michael Wu <mw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - 2 releases have been made and committers have summed lots of
> > experience
> > > of the releasing process.
> > > - More and more contributions are received from the community.
> > > - JIRA tickets are all with detailed descriptions.
> > > - PRs follow a good way of collaboration.
> > > - The project is being established in the industry.
> > > - Responses are made timely to requesters.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Liangfei.Su <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed.
> > > > JIRA with clear comments.
> > > > PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache naming.
> > This
> > > > keeps clear commit history and friendly comments.
> > > > Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join
> in.
> > > > Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community easier
> > to
> > > > involve in.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Ralph
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Vote +1.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are more and more contributors and they are making great
> > > > > contributions to Apache Eagle.
> > > > > Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use
> > eagle
> > > > > system.
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other
> > > > corporations
> > > > > to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more
> > powerful.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be
> > > > better.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Jinhu
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Vote +1.
> > > > > > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has
> > been
> > > > > made
> > > > > > since last discussion:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has
> > > > become
> > > > > > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management
> > through
> > > > > Eagle
> > > > > > UI.)
> > > > > > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more
> > stable
> > > > and
> > > > > > robust.
> > > > > > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on
> daily
> > > > > > discussion happened in the emails.
> > > > > > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different
> corporations
> > > and
> > > > > > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg,
> > Yahoo
> > > > > News)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Da
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > yonzhang2012@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Eagle Community,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since
> > we
> > > > last
> > > > > > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we
> > restart
> > > > > > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > > > > > > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> Documentation
> > > > > > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > > > > > > 4. Two releases are made
> > > > > > > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> > > > > > project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > > > > > > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%
> > > > > E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > Edward
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We
> > > > > appreciate
> > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > > Jing
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <
> > > > > tangjijun@yhd.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache
> Eagle.
> > > > > > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for
> > > community
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > > these improvement.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best Wishes
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 唐觊隽
> > > > > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > > > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > > > > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > > > > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang
> > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves.
> We
> > > have
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will
> be
> > > > stable
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > build will be successful.
> > > > > > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > > > > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let
> user
> > > and
> > > > > > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them
> a.
> > > > > > > Development
> > > > > > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > > > > > Development+Guide
> > > > > > > > b. Product features introduction
> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > > > > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design,
> > etc.
> > > > can
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your
> > contribution
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We
> > > really
> > > > > > > > appreciate it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your
> > > > thoughts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > > Jing
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > > > > > > org/sup/index.html
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > updated with new content, please review if it
> conforms
> > to
> > > > > what
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > > expected.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> > > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi mentors,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will update security page content taking the
> > > mentioned
> > > > > > > aspects.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other
> gaps
> > > > that
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > feel eagle
> > > > > > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to
> > > point
> > > > > > issues
> > > > > > > > out and we
> > > > > > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation
> > > > > requires.
> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most
> > projects
> > > do
> > > > > not
> > > > > > > > have a
> > > > > > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities
> > > > should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > reported to
> > > > > > > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do,
> Kafka
> > > > > seems a
> > > > > > > > good model
> > > > > > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and
> clear[2].
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html
> <
> > > > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html
> <
> > > > > > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > > > > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me,
> > > > though I
> > > > > > > > haven't delved
> > > > > > > > >> deep into it.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> > > > > > security-related
> > > > > > > > product I
> > > > > > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined
> > > process/protocol
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > ensured
> > > > > > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until
> > patched,
> > > > CVE
> > > > > > > > process, etc.
> > > > > > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during
> > > > > > incubation,
> > > > > > > > but should be
> > > > > > > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for
> > > understanding
> > > > > > what
> > > > > > > > is expected
> > > > > > > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > -Taylor
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > > > > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/
> > security/committers.html
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > > > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > <
> > > > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > uence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > Podli
> > > > > > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list
> and
> > > JIRA
> > > > > > > > (listed in
> > > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html
> <
> > > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html
> >)
> > do
> > > > not
> > > > > > > seem
> > > > > > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues,
> > because
> > > > they
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > public. Is a
> > > > > > > > >> private channel needed?
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is
> > > ready
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > graduate. The
> > > > > > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate,
> > > > including
> > > > > > > > agreeing bylaws
> > > > > > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary),
> > choosing
> > > an
> > > > > > > > initial PMC chair,
> > > > > > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and
> starting
> > a
> > > > vote
> > > > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >> Julian
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > > > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we
> > can
> > > > > > remove
> > > > > > > > that once
> > > > > > > > >> after
> > > > > > > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > >> >>> Edward
> > > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > > > hao@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle
> Podling
> > > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > > > Assessment".
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC)
> please
> > > > help
> > > > > > > > review and
> > > > > > > > >> comment?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu
> <
> > > > > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we
> created a
> > > > wiki
> > > > > > page
> > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> .
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your
> > valuable
> > > > > > > judgement
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the
> > model
> > > > > > values
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> inspects, and
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki
> page,
> > > > > > > personally,
> > > > > > > > I think
> > > > > > > > >> Eagle
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> is
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is
> > > facing
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > right way
> > > > > > > > >> towards
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK"
> > stands
> > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > >> resolved
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items
> > that
> > > > > we're
> > > > > > > > striving to
> > > > > > > > >> work
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> on
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1
> item
> > > > > marked
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model
> seems
> > > not
> > > > > > > fitting
> > > > > > > > for eagle,
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> could
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> <
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#
> > EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment
> > > > -RE40
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be
> > appreciated,
> > > > as
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > > > we made or
> > > > > > > > >> will
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the
> > right
> > > > > way.
> > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen
> <
> > > > > > > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation
> > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > > for Eagle.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand
> > how
> > > > to
> > > > > > run
> > > > > > > > an open
> > > > > > > > >> source
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle
> > > (incubating)
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > now
> > > > > > > > open to be
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of
> different
> > > > > > > > organizations
> > > > > > > > >> including
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> but
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides,
> > > > Yihaodian,
> > > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > >> community
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> has
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding
> > itself
> > > > by
> > > > > > > > sharing and
> > > > > > > > >> talking
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in
> international
> > > > > > > > conferences like
> > > > > > > > >> Hadoop
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose,
> > > London,
> > > > > > > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And
> > the
> > > > > > > > community has
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively
> > > preparing
> > > > > > v0.5.0
> > > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> apache
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready
> to
> > > > > > graduate,
> > > > > > > > right now
> > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle
> > > > Podling
> > > > > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> to
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks
> > may
> > > > > remain
> > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor
> > > > Goetz <
> > > > > > > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a
> podling
> > > is
> > > > > > > healthy
> > > > > > > > in terms
> > > > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making
> releases. I
> > > > don't
> > > > > > > > think technical
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > > > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation,
> > Tech
> > > > > Dept
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang,
> > > > Shanghai
> > > > > > > > (201203)
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:
> > > yonzhang2012@apache.
> > > > > org]
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to
> > graduate?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list,
> > and
> > > > will
> > > > > > go
> > > > > > > > through
> > > > > > > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian
> > > Hyde <
> > > > > > > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> > > > > > > contributors.
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by Jilin <ji...@apache.org>.
+1
Eagle have a great process during this year. And it's also important to the
Hadoop ecosphere.
- Committer well follow the jira & PR process.
- Release the stable version.
- Keep updating the project.
I think it's time for graduation.
2016-10-18 11:34 GMT+08:00 Hao Chen <ha...@apache.org>:
> +1
>
> Very glad to hear that Eagle is infinitely closing to graduate at a
> top-level project since entering incubator at Oct 26th, 2016.
>
> In the past one year, the eagle community has always keep learning, growing
> and practicing apache way every where and every day:
>
> - Meritocracy
> - Peer to Peer
> - Consensus decision making
> - Open, online communication
> - Responsible oversight
>
> Until now (10/26/2015 ~ 10/18/2016), eagle community has grown very fast in
> features, code quality, community, consensus building etc.
>
> - Reached a very high maturity level: https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> Podling+Maturity+Assessment>
> - Added *4+* new committers and *20+* contributors from different
> organizations around the world side
> - Successfully released *2* major versions and some minor versions,
> resolved *632+* jira tickets and *577+* pull requests.
> - *5+* public originations (e.g. eBay, Paypal, Yihaodian, Dataguise,
> etc.) are using or adopting eagle to monitor their hadoop clusters.
> - Shared eagle and apache way in *10+* tech conferences in* 8+
> *different
> cities around the world (e.g. Hadoop Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon, etc.)
>
> - Hao
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Michael Wu <mw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > - 2 releases have been made and committers have summed lots of
> experience
> > of the releasing process.
> > - More and more contributions are received from the community.
> > - JIRA tickets are all with detailed descriptions.
> > - PRs follow a good way of collaboration.
> > - The project is being established in the industry.
> > - Responses are made timely to requesters.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Liangfei.Su <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed.
> > > JIRA with clear comments.
> > > PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache naming.
> This
> > > keeps clear commit history and friendly comments.
> > > Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join in.
> > > Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community easier
> to
> > > involve in.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ralph
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Vote +1.
> > > >
> > > > There are more and more contributors and they are making great
> > > > contributions to Apache Eagle.
> > > > Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use
> eagle
> > > > system.
> > > >
> > > > Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other
> > > corporations
> > > > to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more
> powerful.
> > > >
> > > > I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be
> > > better.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Jinhu
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Vote +1.
> > > > > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has
> been
> > > > made
> > > > > since last discussion:
> > > > >
> > > > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has
> > > become
> > > > > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management
> through
> > > > Eagle
> > > > > UI.)
> > > > > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more
> stable
> > > and
> > > > > robust.
> > > > > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily
> > > > > discussion happened in the emails.
> > > > > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations
> > and
> > > > > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg,
> Yahoo
> > > > News)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Da
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > yonzhang2012@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Eagle Community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since
> we
> > > last
> > > > > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we
> restart
> > > > > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > > > > > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
> > > > > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > > > > > 4. Two releases are made
> > > > > > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> > > > > project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > > > > > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%
> > > > E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Edward
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We
> > > > appreciate
> > > > > > it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > Jing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <
> > > > tangjijun@yhd.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> > > > > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for
> > community
> > > > with
> > > > > > > these improvement.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best Wishes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 唐觊隽
> > > > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > > > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > > > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang
> > > Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We
> > have
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be
> > > stable
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > build will be successful.
> > > > > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > > > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user
> > and
> > > > > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a.
> > > > > > Development
> > > > > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > > > > Development+Guide
> > > > > > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > > > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design,
> etc.
> > > can
> > > > be
> > > > > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your
> contribution
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We
> > really
> > > > > > > appreciate it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your
> > > thoughts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > > Jing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > > > > > org/sup/index.html
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms
> to
> > > > what
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > expected.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi mentors,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will update security page content taking the
> > mentioned
> > > > > > aspects.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps
> > > that
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > feel eagle
> > > > > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to
> > point
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > > out and we
> > > > > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation
> > > > requires.
> > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most
> projects
> > do
> > > > not
> > > > > > > have a
> > > > > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities
> > > should
> > > > be
> > > > > > > reported to
> > > > > > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka
> > > > seems a
> > > > > > > good model
> > > > > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> > > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> > > > > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > > > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me,
> > > though I
> > > > > > > haven't delved
> > > > > > > >> deep into it.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> > > > > security-related
> > > > > > > product I
> > > > > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined
> > process/protocol
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > ensured
> > > > > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until
> patched,
> > > CVE
> > > > > > > process, etc.
> > > > > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during
> > > > > incubation,
> > > > > > > but should be
> > > > > > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for
> > understanding
> > > > > what
> > > > > > > is expected
> > > > > > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > -Taylor
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > > > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/
> security/committers.html
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> <
> > > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > uence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > Podli
> > > > > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and
> > JIRA
> > > > > > > (listed in
> > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> > > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>)
> do
> > > not
> > > > > > seem
> > > > > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues,
> because
> > > they
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > public. Is a
> > > > > > > >> private channel needed?
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is
> > ready
> > > > to
> > > > > > > graduate. The
> > > > > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate,
> > > including
> > > > > > > agreeing bylaws
> > > > > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary),
> choosing
> > an
> > > > > > > initial PMC chair,
> > > > > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting
> a
> > > vote
> > > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> Julian
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we
> can
> > > > > remove
> > > > > > > that once
> > > > > > > >> after
> > > > > > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > > > > > >> >>> Edward
> > > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > > hao@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling
> > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > > Assessment".
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please
> > > help
> > > > > > > review and
> > > > > > > >> comment?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> > > > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a
> > > wiki
> > > > > page
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> .
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your
> valuable
> > > > > > judgement
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the
> model
> > > > > values
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > >> inspects, and
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page,
> > > > > > personally,
> > > > > > > I think
> > > > > > > >> Eagle
> > > > > > > >> >>>> is
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is
> > facing
> > > > the
> > > > > > > right way
> > > > > > > >> towards
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK"
> stands
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > all
> > > > > > > >> resolved
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items
> that
> > > > we're
> > > > > > > striving to
> > > > > > > >> work
> > > > > > > >> >>>> on
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item
> > > > marked
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems
> > not
> > > > > > fitting
> > > > > > > for eagle,
> > > > > > > >> >>>> could
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> <
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#
> EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment
> > > -RE40
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be
> appreciated,
> > > as
> > > > > all
> > > > > > > we made or
> > > > > > > >> will
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the
> right
> > > > way.
> > > > > :)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation
> > > > > discussion
> > > > > > > for Eagle.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand
> how
> > > to
> > > > > run
> > > > > > > an open
> > > > > > > >> source
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle
> > (incubating)
> > > > is
> > > > > > now
> > > > > > > open to be
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> > > > > > > organizations
> > > > > > > >> including
> > > > > > > >> >>>> but
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides,
> > > Yihaodian,
> > > > > > etc.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > >> community
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> has
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding
> itself
> > > by
> > > > > > > sharing and
> > > > > > > >> talking
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> > > > > > > conferences like
> > > > > > > >> Hadoop
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose,
> > London,
> > > > > > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And
> the
> > > > > > > community has
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively
> > preparing
> > > > > v0.5.0
> > > > > > > following
> > > > > > > >> >>>> apache
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to
> > > > > graduate,
> > > > > > > right now
> > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle
> > > Podling
> > > > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> to
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks
> may
> > > > remain
> > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor
> > > Goetz <
> > > > > > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling
> > is
> > > > > > healthy
> > > > > > > in terms
> > > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I
> > > don't
> > > > > > > think technical
> > > > > > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation,
> Tech
> > > > Dept
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang,
> > > Shanghai
> > > > > > > (201203)
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:
> > yonzhang2012@apache.
> > > > org]
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to
> graduate?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list,
> and
> > > will
> > > > > go
> > > > > > > through
> > > > > > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian
> > Hyde <
> > > > > > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> > > > > > contributors.
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by Hao Chen <ha...@apache.org>.
+1
Very glad to hear that Eagle is infinitely closing to graduate at a
top-level project since entering incubator at Oct 26th, 2016.
In the past one year, the eagle community has always keep learning, growing
and practicing apache way every where and every day:
- Meritocracy
- Peer to Peer
- Consensus decision making
- Open, online communication
- Responsible oversight
Until now (10/26/2015 ~ 10/18/2016), eagle community has grown very fast in
features, code quality, community, consensus building etc.
- Reached a very high maturity level: https://cwiki.apache.org/
confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment>
- Added *4+* new committers and *20+* contributors from different
organizations around the world side
- Successfully released *2* major versions and some minor versions,
resolved *632+* jira tickets and *577+* pull requests.
- *5+* public originations (e.g. eBay, Paypal, Yihaodian, Dataguise,
etc.) are using or adopting eagle to monitor their hadoop clusters.
- Shared eagle and apache way in *10+* tech conferences in* 8+ *different
cities around the world (e.g. Hadoop Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon, etc.)
- Hao
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Michael Wu <mw...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - 2 releases have been made and committers have summed lots of experience
> of the releasing process.
> - More and more contributions are received from the community.
> - JIRA tickets are all with detailed descriptions.
> - PRs follow a good way of collaboration.
> - The project is being established in the industry.
> - Responses are made timely to requesters.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Liangfei.Su <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed.
> > JIRA with clear comments.
> > PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache naming. This
> > keeps clear commit history and friendly comments.
> > Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join in.
> > Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community easier to
> > involve in.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ralph
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Vote +1.
> > >
> > > There are more and more contributors and they are making great
> > > contributions to Apache Eagle.
> > > Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use eagle
> > > system.
> > >
> > > Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other
> > corporations
> > > to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more powerful.
> > >
> > > I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be
> > better.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Jinhu
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Vote +1.
> > > > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been
> > > made
> > > > since last discussion:
> > > >
> > > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has
> > become
> > > > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through
> > > Eagle
> > > > UI.)
> > > > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable
> > and
> > > > robust.
> > > > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily
> > > > discussion happened in the emails.
> > > > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations
> and
> > > > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo
> > > News)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Da
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <
> yonzhang2012@apache.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Eagle Community,
> > > > >
> > > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we
> > last
> > > > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart
> > > > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > > > > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
> > > > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > > > > 4. Two releases are made
> > > > > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> > > > project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > > > > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%
> > > E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Edward
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We
> > > appreciate
> > > > > it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > Jing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <
> > > tangjijun@yhd.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> > > > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for
> community
> > > with
> > > > > > these improvement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Wishes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 唐觊隽
> > > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang
> > Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We
> have
> > > > been
> > > > > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be
> > stable
> > > > and
> > > > > > build will be successful.
> > > > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user
> and
> > > > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a.
> > > > > Development
> > > > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > > > Development+Guide
> > > > > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc.
> > can
> > > be
> > > > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We
> really
> > > > > > appreciate it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your
> > thoughts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > Jing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > > > > org/sup/index.html
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to
> > > what
> > > > we
> > > > > > expected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi mentors,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will update security page content taking the
> mentioned
> > > > > aspects.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps
> > that
> > > > you
> > > > > > feel eagle
> > > > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to
> point
> > > > issues
> > > > > > out and we
> > > > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation
> > > requires.
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects
> do
> > > not
> > > > > > have a
> > > > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities
> > should
> > > be
> > > > > > reported to
> > > > > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka
> > > seems a
> > > > > > good model
> > > > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> > > > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me,
> > though I
> > > > > > haven't delved
> > > > > > >> deep into it.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> > > > security-related
> > > > > > product I
> > > > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined
> process/protocol
> > > > that
> > > > > > ensured
> > > > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched,
> > CVE
> > > > > > process, etc.
> > > > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during
> > > > incubation,
> > > > > > but should be
> > > > > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for
> understanding
> > > > what
> > > > > > is expected
> > > > > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > -Taylor
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <
> > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > Podli
> > > > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and
> JIRA
> > > > > > (listed in
> > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do
> > not
> > > > > seem
> > > > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because
> > they
> > > > are
> > > > > > public. Is a
> > > > > > >> private channel needed?
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is
> ready
> > > to
> > > > > > graduate. The
> > > > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate,
> > including
> > > > > > agreeing bylaws
> > > > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing
> an
> > > > > > initial PMC chair,
> > > > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a
> > vote
> > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Julian
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can
> > > > remove
> > > > > > that once
> > > > > > >> after
> > > > > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > > > > >> >>> Edward
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > hao@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling
> > > > Maturity
> > > > > > Assessment".
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please
> > help
> > > > > > review and
> > > > > > >> comment?
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> > > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a
> > wiki
> > > > page
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > >> >>>>> .
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable
> > > > > judgement
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model
> > > > values
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> inspects, and
> > > > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page,
> > > > > personally,
> > > > > > I think
> > > > > > >> Eagle
> > > > > > >> >>>> is
> > > > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is
> facing
> > > the
> > > > > > right way
> > > > > > >> towards
> > > > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > >> resolved
> > > > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that
> > > we're
> > > > > > striving to
> > > > > > >> work
> > > > > > >> >>>> on
> > > > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item
> > > marked
> > > > as
> > > > > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems
> not
> > > > > fitting
> > > > > > for eagle,
> > > > > > >> >>>> could
> > > > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > > > > > >> >>>>> <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment
> > -RE40
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated,
> > as
> > > > all
> > > > > > we made or
> > > > > > >> will
> > > > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right
> > > way.
> > > > :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation
> > > > discussion
> > > > > > for Eagle.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how
> > to
> > > > run
> > > > > > an open
> > > > > > >> source
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle
> (incubating)
> > > is
> > > > > now
> > > > > > open to be
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> > > > > > organizations
> > > > > > >> including
> > > > > > >> >>>> but
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides,
> > Yihaodian,
> > > > > etc.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > >> community
> > > > > > >> >>>>> has
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself
> > by
> > > > > > sharing and
> > > > > > >> talking
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> > > > > > conferences like
> > > > > > >> Hadoop
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose,
> London,
> > > > > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the
> > > > > > community has
> > > > > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively
> preparing
> > > > v0.5.0
> > > > > > following
> > > > > > >> >>>> apache
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to
> > > > graduate,
> > > > > > right now
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle
> > Podling
> > > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > > > > >> >>>>> to
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may
> > > remain
> > > > > > before
> > > > > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor
> > Goetz <
> > > > > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling
> is
> > > > > healthy
> > > > > > in terms
> > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I
> > don't
> > > > > > think technical
> > > > > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech
> > > Dept
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang,
> > Shanghai
> > > > > > (201203)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:
> yonzhang2012@apache.
> > > org]
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and
> > will
> > > > go
> > > > > > through
> > > > > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian
> Hyde <
> > > > > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> > > > > contributors.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by arunkarthick m <ar...@gmail.com>.
+1
Apache Eagle solves a very important gap in the Hadoop domain. In very
complex data platforms its really hard to secure, govern and monitor
activities.
Eagle makes it easier and also supports petabyte scale. Over the last year
or so we have presented Eagle in multiple hadoop summit and strata hadoop
world conferences where attendees acknowledged the problem and the solution
that Eagle provides.
The community has grown strongly and when more and more corporates are
starting to enhance data security in hadoop platform they are taking a look
at Apache Eagle.\
I think Apache Eagle is definitely ready for graduation and will help
community grow and reach further.
Thanks,
Arun Manoharan
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Michael Wu <mw...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> - 2 releases have been made and committers have summed lots of experience
> of the releasing process.
> - More and more contributions are received from the community.
> - JIRA tickets are all with detailed descriptions.
> - PRs follow a good way of collaboration.
> - The project is being established in the industry.
> - Responses are made timely to requesters.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Liangfei.Su <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed.
> > JIRA with clear comments.
> > PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache naming. This
> > keeps clear commit history and friendly comments.
> > Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join in.
> > Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community easier to
> > involve in.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ralph
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Vote +1.
> > >
> > > There are more and more contributors and they are making great
> > > contributions to Apache Eagle.
> > > Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use eagle
> > > system.
> > >
> > > Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other
> > corporations
> > > to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more powerful.
> > >
> > > I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be
> > better.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Jinhu
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Vote +1.
> > > > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been
> > > made
> > > > since last discussion:
> > > >
> > > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has
> > become
> > > > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through
> > > Eagle
> > > > UI.)
> > > > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable
> > and
> > > > robust.
> > > > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily
> > > > discussion happened in the emails.
> > > > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations
> and
> > > > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo
> > > News)
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Da
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <
> yonzhang2012@apache.org
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Eagle Community,
> > > > >
> > > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we
> > last
> > > > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart
> > > > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > > > > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
> > > > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > > > > 4. Two releases are made
> > > > > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> > > > project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > > > > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%
> > > E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Edward
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We
> > > appreciate
> > > > > it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > Jing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <
> > > tangjijun@yhd.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> > > > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for
> community
> > > with
> > > > > > these improvement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best Wishes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 唐觊隽
> > > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang
> > Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We
> have
> > > > been
> > > > > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be
> > stable
> > > > and
> > > > > > build will be successful.
> > > > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user
> and
> > > > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a.
> > > > > Development
> > > > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > > > Development+Guide
> > > > > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc.
> > can
> > > be
> > > > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We
> really
> > > > > > appreciate it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your
> > thoughts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > Jing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > > > > org/sup/index.html
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to
> > > what
> > > > we
> > > > > > expected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi mentors,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will update security page content taking the
> mentioned
> > > > > aspects.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps
> > that
> > > > you
> > > > > > feel eagle
> > > > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to
> point
> > > > issues
> > > > > > out and we
> > > > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation
> > > requires.
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Michael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects
> do
> > > not
> > > > > > have a
> > > > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities
> > should
> > > be
> > > > > > reported to
> > > > > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka
> > > seems a
> > > > > > good model
> > > > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> > > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> > > > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me,
> > though I
> > > > > > haven't delved
> > > > > > >> deep into it.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> > > > security-related
> > > > > > product I
> > > > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined
> process/protocol
> > > > that
> > > > > > ensured
> > > > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched,
> > CVE
> > > > > > process, etc.
> > > > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during
> > > > incubation,
> > > > > > but should be
> > > > > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for
> understanding
> > > > what
> > > > > > is expected
> > > > > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > -Taylor
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <
> > > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > Podli
> > > > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and
> JIRA
> > > > > > (listed in
> > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> > > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do
> > not
> > > > > seem
> > > > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because
> > they
> > > > are
> > > > > > public. Is a
> > > > > > >> private channel needed?
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is
> ready
> > > to
> > > > > > graduate. The
> > > > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate,
> > including
> > > > > > agreeing bylaws
> > > > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing
> an
> > > > > > initial PMC chair,
> > > > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a
> > vote
> > > > > > thread.
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >> Julian
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can
> > > > remove
> > > > > > that once
> > > > > > >> after
> > > > > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > > > > >> >>> Edward
> > > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > hao@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling
> > > > Maturity
> > > > > > Assessment".
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please
> > help
> > > > > > review and
> > > > > > >> comment?
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> > > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a
> > wiki
> > > > page
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > > >> >>>>> .
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable
> > > > > judgement
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model
> > > > values
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > >> inspects, and
> > > > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page,
> > > > > personally,
> > > > > > I think
> > > > > > >> Eagle
> > > > > > >> >>>> is
> > > > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is
> facing
> > > the
> > > > > > right way
> > > > > > >> towards
> > > > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > all
> > > > > > >> resolved
> > > > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that
> > > we're
> > > > > > striving to
> > > > > > >> work
> > > > > > >> >>>> on
> > > > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item
> > > marked
> > > > as
> > > > > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems
> not
> > > > > fitting
> > > > > > for eagle,
> > > > > > >> >>>> could
> > > > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > > > > > >> >>>>> <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > > Podlin
> > > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment
> > -RE40
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated,
> > as
> > > > all
> > > > > > we made or
> > > > > > >> will
> > > > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right
> > > way.
> > > > :)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation
> > > > discussion
> > > > > > for Eagle.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how
> > to
> > > > run
> > > > > > an open
> > > > > > >> source
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle
> (incubating)
> > > is
> > > > > now
> > > > > > open to be
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> > > > > > organizations
> > > > > > >> including
> > > > > > >> >>>> but
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides,
> > Yihaodian,
> > > > > etc.
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > >> community
> > > > > > >> >>>>> has
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself
> > by
> > > > > > sharing and
> > > > > > >> talking
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> > > > > > conferences like
> > > > > > >> Hadoop
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose,
> London,
> > > > > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the
> > > > > > community has
> > > > > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively
> preparing
> > > > v0.5.0
> > > > > > following
> > > > > > >> >>>> apache
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to
> > > > graduate,
> > > > > > right now
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle
> > Podling
> > > > > > Maturity
> > > > > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > > > > >> >>>>> to
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may
> > > remain
> > > > > > before
> > > > > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor
> > Goetz <
> > > > > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling
> is
> > > > > healthy
> > > > > > in terms
> > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I
> > don't
> > > > > > think technical
> > > > > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech
> > > Dept
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang,
> > Shanghai
> > > > > > (201203)
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:
> yonzhang2012@apache.
> > > org]
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and
> > will
> > > > go
> > > > > > through
> > > > > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian
> Hyde <
> > > > > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> > > > > contributors.
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Arun Karthick
201-850-9399
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by Michael Wu <mw...@apache.org>.
+1
- 2 releases have been made and committers have summed lots of experience
of the releasing process.
- More and more contributions are received from the community.
- JIRA tickets are all with detailed descriptions.
- PRs follow a good way of collaboration.
- The project is being established in the industry.
- Responses are made timely to requesters.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Liangfei.Su <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed.
> JIRA with clear comments.
> PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache naming. This
> keeps clear commit history and friendly comments.
> Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join in.
> Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community easier to
> involve in.
>
> Thanks,
> Ralph
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Vote +1.
> >
> > There are more and more contributors and they are making great
> > contributions to Apache Eagle.
> > Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use eagle
> > system.
> >
> > Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other
> corporations
> > to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more powerful.
> >
> > I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be
> better.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jinhu
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Vote +1.
> > > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been
> > made
> > > since last discussion:
> > >
> > > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has
> become
> > > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through
> > Eagle
> > > UI.)
> > > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable
> and
> > > robust.
> > > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily
> > > discussion happened in the emails.
> > > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations and
> > > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo
> > News)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Da
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <yonzhang2012@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Eagle Community,
> > > >
> > > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we
> last
> > > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart
> > > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> > > >
> > > > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > > > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
> > > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > > > 4. Two releases are made
> > > > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> > > project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > > > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%
> > E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Edward
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We
> > appreciate
> > > > it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > > Jing
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <
> > tangjijun@yhd.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> > > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for community
> > with
> > > > > these improvement.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Wishes
> > > > >
> > > > > 唐觊隽
> > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> > > > >
> > > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang
> Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We have
> > > been
> > > > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be
> stable
> > > and
> > > > > build will be successful.
> > > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user and
> > > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a.
> > > > Development
> > > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > > Development+Guide
> > > > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc.
> can
> > be
> > > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > > > >
> > > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution to
> > the
> > > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We really
> > > > > appreciate it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your
> thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > > Jing
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > > > org/sup/index.html
> > > > > is
> > > > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to
> > what
> > > we
> > > > > expected.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi mentors,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will update security page content taking the mentioned
> > > > aspects.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps
> that
> > > you
> > > > > feel eagle
> > > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to point
> > > issues
> > > > > out and we
> > > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation
> > requires.
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Michael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects do
> > not
> > > > > have a
> > > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities
> should
> > be
> > > > > reported to
> > > > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka
> > seems a
> > > > > good model
> > > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Julian
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> > > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> > > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me,
> though I
> > > > > haven't delved
> > > > > >> deep into it.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> > > security-related
> > > > > product I
> > > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined process/protocol
> > > that
> > > > > ensured
> > > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched,
> CVE
> > > > > process, etc.
> > > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during
> > > incubation,
> > > > > but should be
> > > > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for understanding
> > > what
> > > > > is expected
> > > > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > -Taylor
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > jhyde@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <
> > > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > Podli
> > > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA
> > > > > (listed in
> > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> > > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do
> not
> > > > seem
> > > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because
> they
> > > are
> > > > > public. Is a
> > > > > >> private channel needed?
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready
> > to
> > > > > graduate. The
> > > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate,
> including
> > > > > agreeing bylaws
> > > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an
> > > > > initial PMC chair,
> > > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a
> vote
> > > > > thread.
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Julian
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can
> > > remove
> > > > > that once
> > > > > >> after
> > > > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > > > >> >>> Edward
> > > > > >> >>>
> > > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > hao@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling
> > > Maturity
> > > > > Assessment".
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please
> help
> > > > > review and
> > > > > >> comment?
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> > > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a
> wiki
> > > page
> > > > > for
> > > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > Podlin
> > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > > >> >>>>> .
> > > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable
> > > > judgement
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model
> > > values
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> inspects, and
> > > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page,
> > > > personally,
> > > > > I think
> > > > > >> Eagle
> > > > > >> >>>> is
> > > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing
> > the
> > > > > right way
> > > > > >> towards
> > > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands
> for
> > > the
> > > > > all
> > > > > >> resolved
> > > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that
> > we're
> > > > > striving to
> > > > > >> work
> > > > > >> >>>> on
> > > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item
> > marked
> > > as
> > > > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not
> > > > fitting
> > > > > for eagle,
> > > > > >> >>>> could
> > > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > > > > >> >>>>> <
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > > Podlin
> > > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment
> -RE40
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated,
> as
> > > all
> > > > > we made or
> > > > > >> will
> > > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right
> > way.
> > > :)
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation
> > > discussion
> > > > > for Eagle.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how
> to
> > > run
> > > > > an open
> > > > > >> source
> > > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating)
> > is
> > > > now
> > > > > open to be
> > > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> > > > > organizations
> > > > > >> including
> > > > > >> >>>> but
> > > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides,
> Yihaodian,
> > > > etc.
> > > > > The
> > > > > >> community
> > > > > >> >>>>> has
> > > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself
> by
> > > > > sharing and
> > > > > >> talking
> > > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> > > > > conferences like
> > > > > >> Hadoop
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London,
> > > > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the
> > > > > community has
> > > > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing
> > > v0.5.0
> > > > > following
> > > > > >> >>>> apache
> > > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to
> > > graduate,
> > > > > right now
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle
> Podling
> > > > > Maturity
> > > > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > > > >> >>>>> to
> > > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may
> > remain
> > > > > before
> > > > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor
> Goetz <
> > > > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is
> > > > healthy
> > > > > in terms
> > > > > >> of
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I
> don't
> > > > > think technical
> > > > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech
> > Dept
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang,
> Shanghai
> > > > > (201203)
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:yonzhang2012@apache.
> > org]
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and
> will
> > > go
> > > > > through
> > > > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> > > > contributors.
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > > >> >>>>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by "Liangfei.Su" <su...@gmail.com>.
+1
Eagle Maturity Assessment clear listed and completed.
JIRA with clear comments.
PRs follow the convention that point to given JIRA by apache naming. This
keeps clear commit history and friendly comments.
Very happy to see more contributors other than originators to join in.
Documentation, these are continuing improved to help community easier to
involve in.
Thanks,
Ralph
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vote +1.
>
> There are more and more contributors and they are making great
> contributions to Apache Eagle.
> Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use eagle
> system.
>
> Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other corporations
> to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more powerful.
>
> I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be better.
>
> Thanks
> Jinhu
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Vote +1.
> > "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been
> made
> > since last discussion:
> >
> > - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has become
> > more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through
> Eagle
> > UI.)
> > - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable and
> > robust.
> > - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily
> > discussion happened in the emails.
> > - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations and
> > organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo
> News)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Da
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <yo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Eagle Community,
> > >
> > > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we last
> > > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart
> > > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> > >
> > > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
> > > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > > 4. Two releases are made
> > > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> > project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%
> E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Edward
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We
> appreciate
> > > it.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Jing
> > > >
> > > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <
> tangjijun@yhd.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> > > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for community
> with
> > > > these improvement.
> > > >
> > > > Best Wishes
> > > >
> > > > 唐觊隽
> > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> > > >
> > > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jijun,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We have
> > been
> > > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > > >
> > > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be stable
> > and
> > > > build will be successful.
> > > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user and
> > > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a.
> > > Development
> > > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> > Development+Guide
> > > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc. can
> be
> > > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution to
> the
> > > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We really
> > > > appreciate it.
> > > >
> > > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your thoughts.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > Jing
> > > >
> > > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > > org/sup/index.html
> > > > is
> > > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to
> what
> > we
> > > > expected.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> > mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi mentors,
> > > > >
> > > > > I will update security page content taking the mentioned
> > > aspects.
> > > > >
> > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps that
> > you
> > > > feel eagle
> > > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to point
> > issues
> > > > out and we
> > > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation
> requires.
> > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> > jhyde@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects do
> not
> > > > have a
> > > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities should
> be
> > > > reported to
> > > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka
> seems a
> > > > good model
> > > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Julian
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> > > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me, though I
> > > > haven't delved
> > > > >> deep into it.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> > security-related
> > > > product I
> > > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined process/protocol
> > that
> > > > ensured
> > > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched, CVE
> > > > process, etc.
> > > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during
> > incubation,
> > > > but should be
> > > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for understanding
> > what
> > > > is expected
> > > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > -Taylor
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > jhyde@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <
> > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> Podli
> > > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA
> > > > (listed in
> > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> > > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do not
> > > seem
> > > > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because they
> > are
> > > > public. Is a
> > > > >> private channel needed?
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready
> to
> > > > graduate. The
> > > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate, including
> > > > agreeing bylaws
> > > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an
> > > > initial PMC chair,
> > > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a vote
> > > > thread.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Julian
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can
> > remove
> > > > that once
> > > > >> after
> > > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > > >> >>> Edward
> > > > >> >>>
> > > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > hao@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling
> > Maturity
> > > > Assessment".
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help
> > > > review and
> > > > >> comment?
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> > > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki
> > page
> > > > for
> > > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > Podlin
> > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > > >> >>>>> .
> > > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable
> > > judgement
> > > > and
> > > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model
> > values
> > > > and
> > > > >> inspects, and
> > > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page,
> > > personally,
> > > > I think
> > > > >> Eagle
> > > > >> >>>> is
> > > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing
> the
> > > > right way
> > > > >> towards
> > > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for
> > the
> > > > all
> > > > >> resolved
> > > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that
> we're
> > > > striving to
> > > > >> work
> > > > >> >>>> on
> > > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item
> marked
> > as
> > > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not
> > > fitting
> > > > for eagle,
> > > > >> >>>> could
> > > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > > > >> >>>>> <
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > > Podlin
> > > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as
> > all
> > > > we made or
> > > > >> will
> > > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right
> way.
> > :)
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation
> > discussion
> > > > for Eagle.
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how to
> > run
> > > > an open
> > > > >> source
> > > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating)
> is
> > > now
> > > > open to be
> > > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> > > > organizations
> > > > >> including
> > > > >> >>>> but
> > > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian,
> > > etc.
> > > > The
> > > > >> community
> > > > >> >>>>> has
> > > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself by
> > > > sharing and
> > > > >> talking
> > > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> > > > conferences like
> > > > >> Hadoop
> > > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London,
> > > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the
> > > > community has
> > > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing
> > v0.5.0
> > > > following
> > > > >> >>>> apache
> > > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to
> > graduate,
> > > > right now
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling
> > > > Maturity
> > > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > > >> >>>>> to
> > > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may
> remain
> > > > before
> > > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is
> > > healthy
> > > > in terms
> > > > >> of
> > > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I don't
> > > > think technical
> > > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech
> Dept
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai
> > > > (201203)
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:yonzhang2012@apache.
> org]
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will
> > go
> > > > through
> > > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> > > contributors.
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>>
> > > > >> >>>>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by Jinhu Wu <ji...@gmail.com>.
Vote +1.
There are more and more contributors and they are making great
contributions to Apache Eagle.
Eagle codes are more stable and documents are more helpful to use eagle
system.
Besides, Eagle team are working with other developers in other corporations
to discuss some features and optimizations to make eagle more powerful.
I am also happy to become an Eagle committer and hope Eagle will be better.
Thanks
Jinhu
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:29 AM, Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vote +1.
> "Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been made
> since last discussion:
>
> - Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has become
> more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through Eagle
> UI.)
> - Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable and
> robust.
> - Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily
> discussion happened in the emails.
> - Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations and
> organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo News)
>
> Regards,
> Da
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <yo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Eagle Community,
> >
> > It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we last
> > time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart
> > discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
> >
> > Some documents and data are as follows:
> > 1. Maturity assessment,
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> > 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
> > 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> > 4. Two releases are made
> > 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=
> project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> > 6. ~500 pull requests.
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
> >
> > Thanks
> > Edward
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jijun,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We appreciate
> > it.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Jing
> > >
> > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <ta...@yhd.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> > > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for community with
> > > these improvement.
> > >
> > > Best Wishes
> > >
> > > 唐觊隽
> > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> > >
> > > -----邮件原件-----
> > > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > >
> > > Hi Jijun,
> > >
> > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We have
> been
> > > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> > >
> > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be stable
> and
> > > build will be successful.
> > > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user and
> > > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a.
> > Development
> > > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/
> Development+Guide
> > > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc. can be
> > > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> > >
> > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution to the
> > > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We really
> > > appreciate it.
> > >
> > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your thoughts.
> > >
> > > Best regards
> > > Jing
> > >
> > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> > org/sup/index.html
> > > is
> > > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to what
> we
> > > expected.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <
> mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi mentors,
> > > >
> > > > I will update security page content taking the mentioned
> > aspects.
> > > >
> > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps that
> you
> > > feel eagle
> > > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to point
> issues
> > > out and we
> > > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation requires.
> > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <
> jhyde@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects do not
> > > have a
> > > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities should be
> > > reported to
> > > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka seems a
> > > good model
> > > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> > > >>
> > > >> Julian
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> > > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > > >>
> > > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> > > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me, though I
> > > haven't delved
> > > >> deep into it.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a
> security-related
> > > product I
> > > >> would expect there to be a well-defined process/protocol
> that
> > > ensured
> > > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched, CVE
> > > process, etc.
> > > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during
> incubation,
> > > but should be
> > > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for understanding
> what
> > > is expected
> > > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Taylor
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <
> jhyde@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <
> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podli
> > > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA
> > > (listed in
> > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> > > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do not
> > seem
> > > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because they
> are
> > > public. Is a
> > > >> private channel needed?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready to
> > > graduate. The
> > > >> community should start taking steps to graduate, including
> > > agreeing bylaws
> > > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an
> > > initial PMC chair,
> > > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a vote
> > > thread.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Julian
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can
> remove
> > > that once
> > > >> after
> > > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> Thanks
> > > >> >>> Edward
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> > hao@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling
> Maturity
> > > Assessment".
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help
> > > review and
> > > >> comment?
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>> - Hao
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> > > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki
> page
> > > for
> > > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > Podlin
> > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > > >> >>>>> .
> > > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable
> > judgement
> > > and
> > > >> >>>> instructions.
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model
> values
> > > and
> > > >> inspects, and
> > > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page,
> > personally,
> > > I think
> > > >> Eagle
> > > >> >>>> is
> > > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing the
> > > right way
> > > >> towards
> > > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for
> the
> > > all
> > > >> resolved
> > > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that we're
> > > striving to
> > > >> work
> > > >> >>>> on
> > > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item marked
> as
> > > "NOT APPLY"
> > > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not
> > fitting
> > > for eagle,
> > > >> >>>> could
> > > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > > >> >>>>> <
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > > Podlin
> > > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as
> all
> > > we made or
> > > >> will
> > > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right way.
> :)
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>> Michael
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> > > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation
> discussion
> > > for Eagle.
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how to
> run
> > > an open
> > > >> source
> > > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating) is
> > now
> > > open to be
> > > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> > > organizations
> > > >> including
> > > >> >>>> but
> > > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian,
> > etc.
> > > The
> > > >> community
> > > >> >>>>> has
> > > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself by
> > > sharing and
> > > >> talking
> > > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> > > conferences like
> > > >> Hadoop
> > > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London,
> > > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the
> > > community has
> > > >> >>>>> successfully
> > > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing
> v0.5.0
> > > following
> > > >> >>>> apache
> > > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to
> graduate,
> > > right now
> > > >> the
> > > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling
> > > Maturity
> > > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > > >> >>>>> to
> > > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may remain
> > > before
> > > >> >>>> graduation,
> > > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is
> > healthy
> > > in terms
> > > >> of
> > > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I don't
> > > think technical
> > > >> >>>>> issues
> > > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai
> > > (201203)
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:yonzhang2012@apache.org]
> > > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will
> go
> > > through
> > > >> >>>> maturity
> > > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > > >> >>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > > jhyde@apache.org>
> > > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> > contributors.
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>>
> > > >> >>>>>
> > > >> >>>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] restart Eagle graduate discussion
Posted by Da Zhou <da...@gmail.com>.
Vote +1.
"Eagle Maturity Assessment" looks good to me. Great process has been made
since last discussion:
- Lots of new features have been introduced, now Apache Eagle has become
more powerful and user-friendly.(eg, Application Management through Eagle
UI.)
- Also many fixes have been checked in, which makes Eagle more stable and
robust.
- Community is getting more active, we can tell this based on daily
discussion happened in the emails.
- Apache Eagle is getting more attention by different corporations and
organizations, their cooperation has been reported online (eg, Yahoo News)
Regards,
Da
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Edward Zhang <yo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Eagle Community,
>
> It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we last
> time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart
> discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
>
> Some documents and data are as follows:
> 1. Maturity assessment,
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> Podling+Maturity+Assessment
> 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation
> 3. Four new committers were added since incubation
> 4. Two releases are made
> 5. >600 Jira tickets,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=project%20%3D%20EAGLE
> 6. ~500 pull requests.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr
>
> Thanks
> Edward
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <ji...@ebay.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jijun,
> >
> > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We appreciate
> it.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Jing
> >
> > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <ta...@yhd.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle.
> > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for community with
> > these improvement.
> >
> > Best Wishes
> >
> > 唐觊隽
> > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203)
> >
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:jinge@ebay.com]
> > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50
> > 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org; Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)
> > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> >
> > Hi Jijun,
> >
> > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We have been
> > working on that since we got your email. Now:
> >
> > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be stable and
> > build will be successful.
> > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests.
> > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user and
> > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a.
> Development
> > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide
> > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc. can be
> > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle
> >
> > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution to the
> > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/
> > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We really
> > appreciate it.
> >
> > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your thoughts.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Jing
> >
> > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.
> org/sup/index.html
> > is
> > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to what we
> > expected.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <mchl.wu5@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi mentors,
> > >
> > > I will update security page content taking the mentioned
> aspects.
> > >
> > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps that you
> > feel eagle
> > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to point issues
> > out and we
> > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation requires.
> > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects do not
> > have a
> > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities should be
> > reported to
> > >> security@apache.org. Of the projects that do, Kafka seems a
> > good model
> > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2].
> > >>
> > >> Julian
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html <
> > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html>
> > >>
> > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html <
> > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me, though I
> > haven't delved
> > >> deep into it.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a security-related
> > product I
> > >> would expect there to be a well-defined process/protocol that
> > ensured
> > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched, CVE
> > process, etc.
> > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during incubation,
> > but should be
> > >> prepared for them after graduation.
> > >> >
> > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for understanding what
> > is expected
> > >> from an ASF standpoint.
> > >> >
> > >> > -Taylor
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/
> > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <
> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podli
> > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA
> > (listed in
> > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <
> > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do not
> seem
> > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because they are
> > public. Is a
> > >> private channel needed?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Can some other mentors please review?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready to
> > graduate. The
> > >> community should start taking steps to graduate, including
> > agreeing bylaws
> > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an
> > initial PMC chair,
> > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a vote
> > thread.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Julian
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <
> > yonzhang2012@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can remove
> > that once
> > >> after
> > >> >>> they are reviewed.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Thanks
> > >> >>> Edward
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <
> hao@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling Maturity
> > Assessment".
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Eagle community,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help
> > review and
> > >> comment?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> - Hao
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <
> > mchl.wu5@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Hi guys,
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki page
> > for
> > >> >>>>> self-assessment at:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > Podlin
> > >> g+Maturity+Assessment
> > >> >>>>> .
> > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable
> judgement
> > and
> > >> >>>> instructions.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model values
> > and
> > >> inspects, and
> > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page,
> personally,
> > I think
> > >> Eagle
> > >> >>>> is
> > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing the
> > right way
> > >> towards
> > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks)
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for the
> > all
> > >> resolved
> > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that we're
> > striving to
> > >> work
> > >> >>>> on
> > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item marked as
> > "NOT APPLY"
> > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not
> fitting
> > for eagle,
> > >> >>>> could
> > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40
> > >> >>>>> <
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+
> > Podlin
> > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>> could be skipped?
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as all
> > we made or
> > >> will
> > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right way. :)
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Michael
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <
> > hao@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation discussion
> > for Eagle.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how to run
> > an open
> > >> source
> > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating) is
> now
> > open to be
> > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different
> > organizations
> > >> including
> > >> >>>> but
> > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian,
> etc.
> > The
> > >> community
> > >> >>>>> has
> > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself by
> > sharing and
> > >> talking
> > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international
> > conferences like
> > >> Hadoop
> > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London,
> > Dublin, Shanghai,
> > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the
> > community has
> > >> >>>>> successfully
> > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing v0.5.0
> > following
> > >> >>>> apache
> > >> >>>>>> releasing process.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to graduate,
> > right now
> > >> the
> > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling
> > Maturity
> > >> >>>> Assessment"
> > >> >>>>> to
> > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may remain
> > before
> > >> >>>> graduation,
> > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> - Hao
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <
> > >> ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is
> healthy
> > in terms
> > >> of
> > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I don't
> > think technical
> > >> >>>>> issues
> > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here.
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang
> > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) <
> > >> >>>>>>> tangjijun@yhd.com> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate.
> > >> >>>>>>>> Because
> > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable.
> > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽
> > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept
> > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai
> > (201203)
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件-----
> > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:yonzhang2012@apache.org]
> > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19
> > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: dev@eagle.incubator.apache.org
> > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate?
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will go
> > through
> > >> >>>> maturity
> > >> >>>>>>> model first soon.
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >> >>>>>>>> Edward
> > >> >>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde <
> > jhyde@apache.org>
> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other
> contributors.
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list?
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>