You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2004/08/04 08:01:45 UTC
Re: make test all broken!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sidney Markowitz writes:
> I just did an update and make test and I see the following... This is
> right after I committed my patch, but it doesn't seem like anything that
> has to do with it... Probably some fat fingering on my part but I have
> to go pick up kids now immediately and can't fix it for a few hours if
> it is my problem.
odd:
: exit=0 Tue Aug 3 23:01:10 PDT 2004; cd /home/jm/ftp/spamassassin
: jm 1046...; make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/basic_lint................ok
t/bayesdbm..................ok
t/bayesdbm_flock............ok 33/44
[etc]
on Debian.
- --j.
> So here's a heads up and an apology in advance if it is something I did.
> This is under Cygwin, perl 5.8.2:
>
> $ make test
> /usr/bin/perl.exe "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
> 'blib/lib', 'b
> lib/arch')" t/*.t
> t/basic_lint................Signal 11
> Not found: anything =
> # Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
> t/basic_lint................FAILED test 1
> Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay
> t/bayesdbm..................ok 33/44Signal 11
> # Failed test 34 in t/bayesdbm.t at line 182
> t/bayesdbm..................NOK 34 Not found: Learned from message = 1
> # Failed test 35 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
> t/bayesdbm..................NOK 35Signal 11
> # Failed test 36 in t/bayesdbm.t at line 185
> t/bayesdbm..................NOK 36 Not found: Learned from message = 1
> # Failed test 37 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2
> t/bayesdbm..................NOK 37Signal 11
> # Failed test 38 in t/bayesdbm.t at line 188
> t/bayesdbm..................NOK 38 Not found: Learned from message = 1
> # Failed test 39 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #3
> t/bayesdbm..................NOK 39Signal 11
> # Failed test 40 in t/bayesdbm.t at line 192
> t/bayesdbm..................NOK 40 Not found: db version =
> non-token data:
> bayes db version
> # Failed test 41 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #4
> t/bayesdbm..................ok 42/44Use of uninitialized value in
> concatenation
> (.) or string at t/bayesdbm.t line 226.
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at t/bayesdbm.t line 227.
> t/bayesdbm..................ok 43/44Use of uninitialized value in
> concatenation
> (.) or string at t/bayesdbm.t line 249.
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at t/bayesdbm.t line 250.
> t/bayesdbm..................FAILED tests 34-41
> Failed 8/44 tests, 81.82% okay
> t/bayesdbm_flock............ok 33/44Signal 11
> # Failed test 34 in t/bayesdbm_flock.t at line 183
> t/bayesdbm_flock............NOK 34 Not found: Learned from message = 1
> # Failed test 35 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
> t/bayesdbm_flock............NOK 35Signal 11
> # Failed test 36 in t/bayesdbm_flock.t at line 186
> t/bayesdbm_flock............NOK 36 Not found: Learned from message = 1
> # Failed test 37 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2
> t/bayesdbm_flock............NOK 37Signal 11
> # Failed test 38 in t/bayesdbm_flock.t at line 189
> t/bayesdbm_flock............NOK 38 Not found: Learned from message = 1
> # Failed test 39 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #3
> t/bayesdbm_flock............NOK 39Signal 11
> # Failed test 40 in t/bayesdbm_flock.t at line 193
> t/bayesdbm_flock............NOK 40 Not found: db version =
> non-token data:
> bayes db version
> # Failed test 41 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #4
> t/bayesdbm_flock............ok 42/44Use of uninitialized value in
> concatenation
> (.) or string at t/bayesdbm_flock.t line 227.
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at t/bayesdbm_flock.t line
> 228.
> t/bayesdbm_flock............ok 43/44Use of uninitialized value in
> concatenation
> (.) or string at t/bayesdbm_flock.t line 250.
> Use of uninitialized value in numeric ne (!=) at t/bayesdbm_flock.t line
> 251.
> t/bayesdbm_flock............FAILED tests 34-41
> Failed 8/44 tests, 81.82% okay
> t/bayessql..................skipped
> all skipped: no reason given
> t/body_mod..................ok
> t/cidrs.....................ok
> t/db_awl_path...............FAILED tests 3-4
> Failed 2/4 tests, 50.00% okay
> t/db_based_whitelist........Signal 11
> # Failed test 1 in t/db_based_whitelist.t at line 18
> t/db_based_whitelist........NOK 1# t/db_based_whitelist.t line 18 is:
> ok (sarun
> ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist
> whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint.org
> ", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 2 in t/db_based_whitelist.t at line 21
> t/db_based_whitelist........NOK 2# t/db_based_whitelist.t line 21 is:
> ok (sarun
> ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 3 in t/db_based_whitelist.t at line 22
> t/db_based_whitelist........NOK 3# t/db_based_whitelist.t line 22 is:
> ok (sarun
> ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 4 in t/db_based_whitelist.t at line 23
> t/db_based_whitelist........NOK 4# t/db_based_whitelist.t line 23 is:
> ok (sarun
> ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 5 in t/db_based_whitelist.t at line 26
> t/db_based_whitelist........NOK 5# t/db_based_whitelist.t line 26 is:
> ok (sarun
> ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Not found: subj = Subject: Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelisting
> # Failed test 6 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
> t/db_based_whitelist........NOK 6Signal 11
> # Failed test 7 in t/db_based_whitelist.t at line 30
> t/db_based_whitelist........NOK 7# t/db_based_whitelist.t line 30 is:
> ok (sarun
> ("-L -t < data/spam/004", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Not found: subj = Subject: 4000 Your Vacation Winning !
> # Failed test 8 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2
> t/db_based_whitelist........FAILED tests 1-8
> Failed 8/8 tests, 0.00% okay
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....Signal 11
> # Failed test 1 in t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t at line 18
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....NOK 1# t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t line 18
> is: ok (s
> arun ("--remove-addr-from-whitelist
> whitelist_test\@whitelist.spamassassin.taint
> .org", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 2 in t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t at line 21
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....NOK 2# t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t line 21
> is: ok (s
> arun ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 3 in t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t at line 22
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....NOK 3# t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t line 22
> is: ok (s
> arun ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 4 in t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t at line 23
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....NOK 4# t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t line 23
> is: ok (s
> arun ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Signal 11
> # Failed test 5 in t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t at line 26
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....NOK 5# t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t line 26
> is: ok (s
> arun ("-L -t < data/nice/002", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Not found: subj = Subject: Re: [SAtalk] auto-whitelisting
> # Failed test 6 in t/SATest.pm at line 530
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....NOK 6Signal 11
> # Failed test 7 in t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t at line 30
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....NOK 7# t/db_based_whitelist_ips.t line 30
> is: ok (s
> arun ("-L -t < data/spam/007", \&patterns_run_cb));
> Not found: status = X-Spam-Status: Yes
> # Failed test 8 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2
> t/db_based_whitelist_ips....FAILED tests 1-8
>
> -- sidney
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFBEHvJQTcbUG5Y7woRAu2vAJ9/SnpqpSWYlWvvODad9lmh/+FxpgCg4psr
v/yB+CgPeg3u42JWTMr59eY=
=IYv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: make test all broken!
Posted by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com>.
False alarm. I had fat-fingered a make clean step while switching from
using a directory for testing under Win32 to testing under Cygwin.
Sorry for posting to the list about it, but if I had messed up my
checkin, I wanted to give people a chance to look at it as I knew I
would not be able to for a while.
-- sidney