You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Yang Lei (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2006/12/14 23:20:21 UTC
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-994) validation on override
validation on override
----------------------
Key: TUSCANY-994
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Java SCA Core
Environment: windows XP
Reporter: Yang Lei
1.service :
override=must , I can still define a using composite without defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation)'s serive
override=no, I can still define a using composite with defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation) 's service
2. reference:
override=no, I can still define in using composite the component(composite implementation) 's reference wired to a new service value
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-994) validation on override
Posted by "Raymond Feng (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464296 ]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-994:
--------------------------------------
By reading the latest SCA spec, the service is now always overridable. I think the @Reference annotation in the Java C&I spec is not consistent with the Override attribute in the assembly.
> validation on override
> ----------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SCA Core
> Environment: windows XP
> Reporter: Yang Lei
> Assigned To: Raymond Feng
>
> 1.service :
> override=must , I can still define a using composite without defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation)'s serive
> override=no, I can still define a using composite with defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation) 's service
> 2. reference:
> override=no, I can still define in using composite the component(composite implementation) 's reference wired to a new service value
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-994) validation on override
Posted by "Raymond Feng (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465052 ]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-994:
--------------------------------------
Can you either attach a test case or point to a test case in the Tuscany itest suite?
Thanks,
Raymond
> validation on override
> ----------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SCA Core
> Environment: windows XP
> Reporter: Yang Lei
> Assigned To: Raymond Feng
>
> 1.service :
> override=must , I can still define a using composite without defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation)'s serive
> override=no, I can still define a using composite with defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation) 's service
> 2. reference:
> override=no, I can still define in using composite the component(composite implementation) 's reference wired to a new service value
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-994) validation on override
Posted by "Raymond Feng (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Raymond Feng updated TUSCANY-994:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: Java-M3
> validation on override
> ----------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SCA Core
> Environment: windows XP
> Reporter: Yang Lei
> Assigned To: Raymond Feng
> Fix For: Java-M3
>
>
> 1.service :
> override=must , I can still define a using composite without defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation)'s serive
> override=no, I can still define a using composite with defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation) 's service
> 2. reference:
> override=no, I can still define in using composite the component(composite implementation) 's reference wired to a new service value
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-994) validation on override
Posted by "Raymond Feng (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-994:
------------------------------------
Assignee: Raymond Feng
> validation on override
> ----------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-994
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SCA Core
> Environment: windows XP
> Reporter: Yang Lei
> Assigned To: Raymond Feng
>
> 1.service :
> override=must , I can still define a using composite without defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation)'s serive
> override=no, I can still define a using composite with defining a composite level service wire to the embedded component(composite implementation) 's service
> 2. reference:
> override=no, I can still define in using composite the component(composite implementation) 's reference wired to a new service value
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org