You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to gitbox@activemq.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/07/16 16:13:07 UTC

[GitHub] [activemq] mattrpav edited a comment on pull request #682: [AMQ-7309] Update to jakarta.jms/jakarta.jms-api:2.0.3

mattrpav edited a comment on pull request #682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/682#issuecomment-881557987


   @jbonofre this change is purely packaging skeleton. I know you mentioned working on full JMS 2.0 support along w/ big things like replicated-kahadb. I thought I'd pitch in to help get the ball rolling on the low-hanging fruit. There is no real code change here, so I think this PR good to merge and should slide in with your real JMS 2.0 impl work. I also broke up the 2.0 Impl work into sub-tasks here-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7309. This should help parallelize the effort amongst contributors.
   
   Reviewing other projects and frameworks, I agree the geronimo vs jakarta is the real question here and I think it makes more sense to go to the Jakarta jar now as it is more target state than using geronimo.
   
   If we go geronimo users will have this to look forward to:
   gerinomo 1.1 -> geronimo 2.0 -> jakarta 2.0 -> jakarta 3.0
   
   Alternatively, if we go jakarta now, users have this:
   gerinomo 1.1 -> jakarta 2.0 -> jakarta 3.0
   
   CXF has transitioned many spec jars to jakarta, and I suspect Camel will do the same as well. I think the alignment makes more sense for CXF and Camel to consume the dep ActiveMQ (being as ActiveMQ is the JMS provider as those ride on top of ActiveMQ), or they simply provide the <exclude/>. Either way, the JEE transition is going to force framework devs and users into being savvy with Maven <exclude/> and I do not think there is any way around that.
   
   I'd be interested in hearing others' perspective as well.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org