You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2010/11/30 01:04:55 UTC

Maven 2 -> Maven

Hi,

I fixed an issue this morning: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2586

I opted to just change "Maven 2" and "Maven 2.0.x" to plain "Maven", and retain "Maven 1.x" as a special case. That seemed neater and more future proof than either "Maven 2.0+" or "Maven 2 & 3".

Any objections? Can someone check the translations I changed still make sense for those that you know?

Thanks,
Brett

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/

Re: Maven 2 -> Maven

Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
Translations are ok.

Thanks Brett.

Emmanuel

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I fixed an issue this morning:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2586
>
> I opted to just change "Maven 2" and "Maven 2.0.x" to plain "Maven", and
> retain "Maven 1.x" as a special case. That seemed neater and more future
> proof than either "Maven 2.0+" or "Maven 2 & 3".
>
> Any objections? Can someone check the translations I changed still make
> sense for those that you know?
>
> Thanks,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Maven 2 -> Maven

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:

> I wonder how that would affect users? I guess they could use the shell support?

They could keep using 1.3.x I suppose.  Or, yes, use the shell support in 1.4.x.

I can't imagine there are enough Maven 1 + Continuum users to justify
keeping it long term.  But at this point it's more work to remove it
than just leave it there.  Other than complicating the UI, it's not
hurting anything.

-- 
Wendy

Re: Maven 2 -> Maven

Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 30/11/2010, at 11:36 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I fixed an issue this morning: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2586
>> 
>> I opted to just change "Maven 2" and "Maven 2.0.x" to plain "Maven", and retain "Maven 1.x" as a special case. That seemed neater and more future proof than either "Maven 2.0+" or "Maven 2 & 3".
> 
> Thanks -- I was going to propose dropping Maven 1 support altogether
> and just calling it "Maven".


I wonder how that would affect users? I guess they could use the shell support?

- Brett

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/

Re: Maven 2 -> Maven

Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> I fixed an issue this morning: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-2586
>
> I opted to just change "Maven 2" and "Maven 2.0.x" to plain "Maven", and retain "Maven 1.x" as a special case. That seemed neater and more future proof than either "Maven 2.0+" or "Maven 2 & 3".

Thanks -- I was going to propose dropping Maven 1 support altogether
and just calling it "Maven".

-- 
Wendy