Access to scriptaliased directory (fwd)

[Rob Hartill <ha...@hyperreal.com>]

Does pathc 16 fixt this?

> Hi Guru! ;-)
> 
> I have discovered some ununiform behavior in Apache's way of
> accessing ScriptAliaced and plain directories.
> When making a request for "http://x.y.z/some/dir/", I get 
> index.html of that /some/dir, as expected.
> 
> But if /some/dir is ScriptAliaced, then Apache (0.8.14) doesn't try to
> execute neither index.html nor index.cgi , complaining
> about "access permission denied" to client. This was cured only
> by explicit request for /some/dir/index.html , where index.html
> is a CGI script, without any changes in config files.
> 
> Perhaps I'm wrong, but I would rather make it behave the same way in
> both cases.
> 
> With best wishes,
> 		Grue.
> 

Re: Access to scriptaliased directory (fwd)

[Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>]

We are compliant with NCSA 1.3 in this respect, by the way.

	Brian

On Fri, 13 Oct 1995, Rob Hartill wrote:
> Does pathc 16 fixt this?
> 
> > Hi Guru! ;-)
> > 
> > I have discovered some ununiform behavior in Apache's way of
> > accessing ScriptAliaced and plain directories.
> > When making a request for "http://x.y.z/some/dir/", I get 
> > index.html of that /some/dir, as expected.
> > 
> > But if /some/dir is ScriptAliaced, then Apache (0.8.14) doesn't try to
> > execute neither index.html nor index.cgi , complaining
> > about "access permission denied" to client. This was cured only
> > by explicit request for /some/dir/index.html , where index.html
> > is a CGI script, without any changes in config files.
> > 
> > Perhaps I'm wrong, but I would rather make it behave the same way in
> > both cases.
> > 
> > With best wishes,
> > 		Grue.
> > 
> 
> 
> 

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/