You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/11/15 14:46:39 UTC
[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2037) Allow Junit4 tests in
our environment.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778101#action_12778101 ]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2037 at 11/15/09 1:45 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Is there some way to use Junit4 parameterized tests to do this LocalizedTestCase-type thing, so we don't have to override runBare()?
was (Author: rcmuir):
Is there some way to use Junit4 parameterized tests to do this LocalizedTestCase-type thing, so we don't have to override runBase()?
> Allow Junit4 tests in our environment.
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2037
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Other
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Environment: Development
> Reporter: Erick Erickson
> Assignee: Erick Erickson
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1
>
> Attachments: junit-4.7.jar, LUCENE-2037.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 8h
> Remaining Estimate: 8h
>
> Now that we're dropping Java 1.4 compatibility for 3.0, we can incorporate Junit4 in testing. Junit3 and junit4 tests can coexist, so no tests should have to be rewritten. We should start this for the 3.1 release so we can get a clean 3.0 out smoothly.
> It's probably worthwhile to convert a small set of tests as an exemplar.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2037) Allow Junit4 tests in
our environment.
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
That thought occurred to me earlier, but I don't know enough specifics yet.
I intend
to find out though....
Erick
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778101#action_12778101]
>
> Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2037 at 11/15/09 1:45 PM:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Is there some way to use Junit4 parameterized tests to do this
> LocalizedTestCase-type thing, so we don't have to override runBare()?
>
>
> was (Author: rcmuir):
> Is there some way to use Junit4 parameterized tests to do this
> LocalizedTestCase-type thing, so we don't have to override runBase()?
>
>
> > Allow Junit4 tests in our environment.
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: LUCENE-2037
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037
> > Project: Lucene - Java
> > Issue Type: Improvement
> > Components: Other
> > Affects Versions: 3.1
> > Environment: Development
> > Reporter: Erick Erickson
> > Assignee: Erick Erickson
> > Priority: Minor
> > Fix For: 3.1
> >
> > Attachments: junit-4.7.jar, LUCENE-2037.patch
> >
> > Original Estimate: 8h
> > Remaining Estimate: 8h
> >
> > Now that we're dropping Java 1.4 compatibility for 3.0, we can
> incorporate Junit4 in testing. Junit3 and junit4 tests can coexist, so no
> tests should have to be rewritten. We should start this for the 3.1 release
> so we can get a clean 3.0 out smoothly.
> > It's probably worthwhile to convert a small set of tests as an exemplar.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>