You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by loboEsa <la...@gmail.com> on 2009/10/07 20:20:54 UTC

Re: ServiceMix version hell...

It's very frustrating a poor quality documentation and tutorial and the
versioning is very confused.

It's a pity because I think ServiceMix is a very powerful product.

I followed the instruction to install and create SUs with ServiceMix 3.3.1
and all my SUs were created with 3.2.3 version. (I used mvn
archetype:create)

I changed my SU's poms as follow:

    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
      <artifactId>servicemix-core</artifactId>
      <version>3.3.1</version>
      <scope>provided</scope>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
      <artifactId>servicemix-file</artifactId>
      <version>2009.01</version>
    </dependency>

but continue using jbi-maven-plugin 3.2.3

How can I use jbi-maven-plugin 3.3.1 (or 2009.01) to create archetypes to
Servicemix 3.3.1 ??????

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ServiceMix-version-hell...-tp24963608p25791661.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ServiceMix version hell...

Posted by loboEsa <la...@gmail.com>.

Hi Jean I try to install(maven) my SA using the follow configuration in all
my SA and SUs

<plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.tooling</groupId>
        <artifactId>jbi-maven-plugin</artifactId>
        <version>4.1</version>
        <extensions>true</extensions>
        <configuration>
          <type>service-assembly</type>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>
</plugins>
        
and into SUs add

<dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
      <artifactId>servicemix-core</artifactId>
      <version>3.3.1</version>
      <scope>provided</scope>
    </dependency>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
      <artifactId>servicemix-file</artifactId>
      <version>2009.01</version>
    </dependency>
</dependencies> 

When I try to install all my project this error apear:

[ERROR]BUILD ERROR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The service unit file-sender-su does not have a dependency which is packaged
as a jbi-component or a project property 'componentName'

If I return jbi-maven-plugin version to 3.2.3 all be fine.

I find in other webpage that it is resolved with componentName property into
SU POM, and yes all be fine until I try to deploy the SA, ServiceMix tell my
that is not posible to install SA because is pending the installation of de
component in touble.

What is the correct version configuration to use the lastest ServiceMix
release (3.3.1) ?????

Is it posible to create meaven archetypes to version 3.3.1 ? The
instructions into the ServiceMix site create only a 3.2.3 version and use a
very old versions of components.

Thanks in advanced.


Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We know that we need to improve the website and documentation. We're 
> working on it (especially with the DocBook documentation which is in 
> incubation for now).
> 
> For your question, the jbi-maven-plugin versionning is independant from 
> the container one (the "real" ServiceMix version). It's better to use 
> the latest stable jbi-maven-plugin version which is currently the 4.1.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> loboEsa wrote:
>> It's very frustrating a poor quality documentation and tutorial and the
>> versioning is very confused.
>> 
>> It's a pity because I think ServiceMix is a very powerful product.
>> 
>> I followed the instruction to install and create SUs with ServiceMix
>> 3.3.1
>> and all my SUs were created with 3.2.3 version. (I used mvn
>> archetype:create)
>> 
>> I changed my SU's poms as follow:
>> 
>>     <dependency>
>>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>servicemix-core</artifactId>
>>       <version>3.3.1</version>
>>       <scope>provided</scope>
>>     </dependency>
>>     <dependency>
>>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>servicemix-file</artifactId>
>>       <version>2009.01</version>
>>     </dependency>
>> 
>> but continue using jbi-maven-plugin 3.2.3
>> 
>> How can I use jbi-maven-plugin 3.3.1 (or 2009.01) to create archetypes to
>> Servicemix 3.3.1 ??????
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ServiceMix-version-hell...-tp24963608p25813548.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: ServiceMix version hell...

Posted by Eric Johnson <EM...@progress.com>.

To get wiki content into DocBook you could give this plug-in a try:
http://fusesource.org/forge/projects/CONFDOC

One of the guys at Progress built it and has been using it with a pretty decent level of success. It can basically turn a confluence space, or subset of a space, into a DocBook book.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:jb@nanthrax.net] 
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:04 AM
To: Eric Johnson
Cc: users@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: Re: ServiceMix version hell...

Hi Eric,

the documentation sandbox is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/jbonofre/documentation/

Any help is welcome especially to add content (migrate wiki pages into 
DocBook document and add content).

For the publication system, I have plan to use maven plugin (docbk or 
doxia or home made) but if you have something already available, why not :)

Regards
JB

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Where is the DocBook documentation being developed? Do you need help setting up a publication system?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:jb@nanthrax.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:36 PM
> To: users@servicemix.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ServiceMix version hell...
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We know that we need to improve the website and documentation. We're 
> working on it (especially with the DocBook documentation which is in 
> incubation for now).
> 
> For your question, the jbi-maven-plugin versionning is independant from 
> the container one (the "real" ServiceMix version). It's better to use 
> the latest stable jbi-maven-plugin version which is currently the 4.1.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> loboEsa wrote:
>> It's very frustrating a poor quality documentation and tutorial and the
>> versioning is very confused.
>>
>> It's a pity because I think ServiceMix is a very powerful product.
>>
>> I followed the instruction to install and create SUs with ServiceMix 3.3.1
>> and all my SUs were created with 3.2.3 version. (I used mvn
>> archetype:create)
>>
>> I changed my SU's poms as follow:
>>
>>     <dependency>
>>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>servicemix-core</artifactId>
>>       <version>3.3.1</version>
>>       <scope>provided</scope>
>>     </dependency>
>>     <dependency>
>>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>servicemix-file</artifactId>
>>       <version>2009.01</version>
>>     </dependency>
>>
>> but continue using jbi-maven-plugin 3.2.3
>>
>> How can I use jbi-maven-plugin 3.3.1 (or 2009.01) to create archetypes to
>> Servicemix 3.3.1 ??????
>>

Re: ServiceMix version hell...

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.

Hi Eric,

the documentation sandbox is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/sandbox/jbonofre/documentation/

Any help is welcome especially to add content (migrate wiki pages into 
DocBook document and add content).

For the publication system, I have plan to use maven plugin (docbk or 
doxia or home made) but if you have something already available, why not :)

Regards
JB

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Where is the DocBook documentation being developed? Do you need help setting up a publication system?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:jb@nanthrax.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:36 PM
> To: users@servicemix.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ServiceMix version hell...
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We know that we need to improve the website and documentation. We're 
> working on it (especially with the DocBook documentation which is in 
> incubation for now).
> 
> For your question, the jbi-maven-plugin versionning is independant from 
> the container one (the "real" ServiceMix version). It's better to use 
> the latest stable jbi-maven-plugin version which is currently the 4.1.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> loboEsa wrote:
>> It's very frustrating a poor quality documentation and tutorial and the
>> versioning is very confused.
>>
>> It's a pity because I think ServiceMix is a very powerful product.
>>
>> I followed the instruction to install and create SUs with ServiceMix 3.3.1
>> and all my SUs were created with 3.2.3 version. (I used mvn
>> archetype:create)
>>
>> I changed my SU's poms as follow:
>>
>>     <dependency>
>>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>servicemix-core</artifactId>
>>       <version>3.3.1</version>
>>       <scope>provided</scope>
>>     </dependency>
>>     <dependency>
>>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>>       <artifactId>servicemix-file</artifactId>
>>       <version>2009.01</version>
>>     </dependency>
>>
>> but continue using jbi-maven-plugin 3.2.3
>>
>> How can I use jbi-maven-plugin 3.3.1 (or 2009.01) to create archetypes to
>> Servicemix 3.3.1 ??????
>>

RE: ServiceMix version hell...

Posted by Eric Johnson <EM...@progress.com>.

Where is the DocBook documentation being developed? Do you need help setting up a publication system?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:jb@nanthrax.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:36 PM
To: users@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: Re: ServiceMix version hell...

Hi,

We know that we need to improve the website and documentation. We're 
working on it (especially with the DocBook documentation which is in 
incubation for now).

For your question, the jbi-maven-plugin versionning is independant from 
the container one (the "real" ServiceMix version). It's better to use 
the latest stable jbi-maven-plugin version which is currently the 4.1.

Regards
JB

loboEsa wrote:
> It's very frustrating a poor quality documentation and tutorial and the
> versioning is very confused.
> 
> It's a pity because I think ServiceMix is a very powerful product.
> 
> I followed the instruction to install and create SUs with ServiceMix 3.3.1
> and all my SUs were created with 3.2.3 version. (I used mvn
> archetype:create)
> 
> I changed my SU's poms as follow:
> 
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>       <artifactId>servicemix-core</artifactId>
>       <version>3.3.1</version>
>       <scope>provided</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>       <artifactId>servicemix-file</artifactId>
>       <version>2009.01</version>
>     </dependency>
> 
> but continue using jbi-maven-plugin 3.2.3
> 
> How can I use jbi-maven-plugin 3.3.1 (or 2009.01) to create archetypes to
> Servicemix 3.3.1 ??????
>

Re: ServiceMix version hell...

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.

Hi,

We know that we need to improve the website and documentation. We're 
working on it (especially with the DocBook documentation which is in 
incubation for now).

For your question, the jbi-maven-plugin versionning is independant from 
the container one (the "real" ServiceMix version). It's better to use 
the latest stable jbi-maven-plugin version which is currently the 4.1.

Regards
JB

loboEsa wrote:
> It's very frustrating a poor quality documentation and tutorial and the
> versioning is very confused.
> 
> It's a pity because I think ServiceMix is a very powerful product.
> 
> I followed the instruction to install and create SUs with ServiceMix 3.3.1
> and all my SUs were created with 3.2.3 version. (I used mvn
> archetype:create)
> 
> I changed my SU's poms as follow:
> 
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>       <artifactId>servicemix-core</artifactId>
>       <version>3.3.1</version>
>       <scope>provided</scope>
>     </dependency>
>     <dependency>
>       <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>       <artifactId>servicemix-file</artifactId>
>       <version>2009.01</version>
>     </dependency>
> 
> but continue using jbi-maven-plugin 3.2.3
> 
> How can I use jbi-maven-plugin 3.3.1 (or 2009.01) to create archetypes to
> Servicemix 3.3.1 ??????
>