You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/11/17 18:28:31 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14628] New: -
Invalid handling of top-level variables declaration together with stylesheet include/import
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14628>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14628
Invalid handling of top-level variables declaration together with stylesheet include/import
Summary: Invalid handling of top-level variables declaration
together with stylesheet include/import
Product: XalanC
Version: 1.2.x
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Normal
Priority: Other
Component: XalanC
AssignedTo: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
ReportedBy: flying@dom.natm.ru
I have performed test of how different XSLT processros handle top-level
<xsl:variable> declarations together with <xsl:import>/<xsl:include>. Results
are pretty confusing for me...
Following XSLT processors are being tested:
- Sablotron 0.96.1
- Xalan 1.2
- LibXSLT 1.0.22
- MSXML 3.1 SP1
All tests was performed on Windows 2000, but o think they will be give same
results for any other platform.
I prepare 6 tests, here is first of them as an example:
t.xml
=====
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<root/>
1.xsl
=====
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:include href="2.xsl"/>
<xsl:variable name="test">[1]</xsl:variable>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:value-of select="$test"/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
2.xsl
=====
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:variable name="test">[2]</xsl:variable>
</xsl:stylesheet>
t.xml and 2.xsl are the same for all tests, only 1.xsl changes. I'll put full
test results togher with contents of 1.xsl into next comment to make it easier
to read.
About Xalan it looks like it fails to confirm XSLT specification
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#top-level-variables): "It is an error if a stylesheet
contains more than one binding of a top-level variable with the same name and
same import precedence." but from other side it is better for practical usage,
so this bug is more dedicated to let you know about this specification break.