You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by "Marco A.G.Pinto" <ma...@mail.telepac.pt> on 2012/05/20 18:09:11 UTC
[EXT] LanguageTool extension may be included in AOO?
Hello!
I was wondering if the extension "LanguageTool" (
http://www.languagetool.org ) could be included in the release packages
of AOO since it is a grammar checker.
I asked this to its author, Daniel Naber, and he told me to ask in the
Mailing List.
So, here I am.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
>Marco A.G.Pinto
-----------------------
--
Re: [EXT] LanguageTool extension may be included in AOO?
Posted by Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org>.
--- Dom 20/5/12, win <wm...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> On 05/20/2012 05:55 PM, Ariel
> Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > Hi Marco,
> >
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:09:11PM +0100, Marco
> A.G.Pinto wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I was wondering if the extension "LanguageTool" (
> >> http://www.languagetool.org ) could be included in the
> release
> >> packages of AOO since it is a grammar checker.
> >>
> >> I asked this to its author, Daniel Naber, and he
> told me to ask in
> >> the Mailing List.
> >
> > The main issue to include this extension by default is
> its LGPL license.
> >
> >
> > Regards
>
> Link-Grammar may be an option. Link-Grammar is used by
> AbiWord but it is under the Link-Grammar license. The
> license looks more compatible with the Apache License, but
> that is just my personal view. I am not sure if there
> is currently an extension for OpenOffice to use
> Link-Grammar.
>
It looks like a 3-clause BSD license: Category-A
Good find!
Pedro.
Re: [EXT] LanguageTool extension may be included in AOO?
Posted by win <wm...@gmail.com>.
On 05/20/2012 05:55 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:09:11PM +0100, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I was wondering if the extension "LanguageTool" (
>> http://www.languagetool.org ) could be included in the release
>> packages of AOO since it is a grammar checker.
>>
>> I asked this to its author, Daniel Naber, and he told me to ask in
>> the Mailing List.
>
> The main issue to include this extension by default is its LGPL license.
>
>
> Regards
Link-Grammar may be an option. Link-Grammar is used by AbiWord but it
is under the Link-Grammar license. The license looks more compatible
with the Apache License, but that is just my personal view. I am not
sure if there is currently an extension for OpenOffice to use
Link-Grammar.
More info on Link-Grammar:
http://www.abisource.com/projects/link-grammar/#download
http://www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link/
This Link-Grammar License:
LICENSE
-------
Copyright (c) 2003,2004 Daniel Sleator, David Temperley, and John
Lafferty. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2007 Mike Ross.
Copyright (c) 2008,2009,2010 Linas Vepstas, Borislav Iordanov.
Copyright (c) 2011 Linas Vepstas
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
distribution.
3. The names "Link Grammar" and "Link Parser" must not be used to
endorse or promote products derived from this software without
prior written permission. To obtain permission, contact
sleator@cs.cmu.edu
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY DANIEL SLEATOR, DAVID TEMPERLEY, JOHN
LAFFERTY AND OTHER CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS OR CONTRIBUTORS
BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY,
OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT
OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
Re: [EXT] LanguageTool extension may be included in AOO?
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Marco,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 05:09:11PM +0100, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering if the extension "LanguageTool" (
> http://www.languagetool.org ) could be included in the release
> packages of AOO since it is a grammar checker.
>
> I asked this to its author, Daniel Naber, and he told me to ask in
> the Mailing List.
The main issue to include this extension by default is its LGPL license.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: [EXT] LanguageTool extension may be included in AOO?
Posted by Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>.
On Sun, 20 May 2012 17:09:11 +0100
"Marco A.G.Pinto" <ma...@mail.telepac.pt> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering if the extension "LanguageTool" (
> http://www.languagetool.org ) could be included in the release packages
> of AOO since it is a grammar checker.
>
> I asked this to its author, Daniel Naber, and he told me to ask in the
> Mailing List.
>
> So, here I am.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> >Marco A.G.Pinto
> -----------------------
Note that a side effect of the excellent LanguageTool extension being active is slower opening of large files (90K word) while LT scans them. (Perhaps 25 seconds instead of 1 or 2). Such perceived slowness may be undesireable.
--
Rory O'Farrell <of...@iol.ie>
Re: [EXT] LanguageTool extension may be included in AOO?
Posted by "Marco A.G.Pinto" <ma...@mail.telepac.pt>.
Ahhh... I believe there is a fix for the slowness bug...
Daniel sent me this e-mail:
On 20-05-2012 20:03, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Sonntag, 20. Mai 2012, you wrote:
>
> Hi Marco,
>
>> I was wondering if the extension "LanguageTool" (
>> http://www.languagetool.org ) could be included in the release packages
>> of AOO since it is a grammar checker.
> thanks for taking care of this. I saw one reply complaining about LT
> slowness - one of these issues can be fixed. Could you point the person who
> replied to this bug report, which contains a solution to the performance
> problem?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=116409
>
> Regards
> Daniel
>
--