You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@daffodil.apache.org by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> on 2020/01/03 16:29:48 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
2.5.0-rc2.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
[ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by "Adams, Joshua" <ja...@tresys.com>.
+1
Validated checksums for release packages.
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 11:29 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
2.5.0-rc2.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
[ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
This VOTE is now closed. I'll send out a result vote shortly.
On 1/6/20 2:05 PM, Sloane, Brandon wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked:
>
> * 'daffodil --version' output
> * Builds locally
> * Passes test suite locally
> * Non publically available schema (MDA); produces same output as under 2.4.0
> * Current bugs in Jira for 2.4.0 (nothing that strikes me as blocking).
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 6, 2020 1:38 PM
> *To:* dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
> +1
>
> I checked:
>
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - NOTICE and LICENSE are accurate
> - RAT check passes
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Can compile from source
> - Tested RPM and Windows installers
> - Validated source release is the same as the git tag
> - Validated that compiled source jars have the same content as jars in
> helper binaries
>
>
> On 1/6/20 12:05 PM, Kilo, Olabusayo wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> I checked the release page, I notice a typo in the 2nd sentence, it says 'UserDefineFunction' instead of 'UserDefinedFunction'.
>>
>> On 1/3/20 11:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
>> 2.5.0-rc2.
>>
>> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>> found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>>
>> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>>
>> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
>> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>, which is included in the KEYS
>> file here:
>>
>> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>>
>> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>>
>> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>>
>> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>>
>> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>>
>> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>>
>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
>> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Steve
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Lola K.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by "Sloane, Brandon" <bs...@tresys.com>.
+1
I checked:
* 'daffodil --version' output
* Builds locally
* Passes test suite locally
* Non publically available schema (MDA); produces same output as under 2.4.0
* Current bugs in Jira for 2.4.0 (nothing that strikes me as blocking).
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 1:38 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
+1
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE and LICENSE are accurate
- RAT check passes
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
- Tested RPM and Windows installers
- Validated source release is the same as the git tag
- Validated that compiled source jars have the same content as jars in
helper binaries
On 1/6/20 12:05 PM, Kilo, Olabusayo wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked the release page, I notice a typo in the 2nd sentence, it says 'UserDefineFunction' instead of 'UserDefinedFunction'.
>
> On 1/3/20 11:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
> 2.5.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Lola K.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
+1
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE and LICENSE are accurate
- RAT check passes
- No unexpected binary files
- Can compile from source
- Tested RPM and Windows installers
- Validated source release is the same as the git tag
- Validated that compiled source jars have the same content as jars in
helper binaries
On 1/6/20 12:05 PM, Kilo, Olabusayo wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked the release page, I notice a typo in the 2nd sentence, it says 'UserDefineFunction' instead of 'UserDefinedFunction'.
>
> On 1/3/20 11:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
> 2.5.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Lola K.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
Thanks, this typo is now fixed.
On 1/6/20 12:05 PM, Kilo, Olabusayo wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked the release page, I notice a typo in the 2nd sentence, it says 'UserDefineFunction' instead of 'UserDefinedFunction'.
>
> On 1/3/20 11:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
> 2.5.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Lola K.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by "Kilo, Olabusayo" <ok...@tresys.com>.
+1
I checked the release page, I notice a typo in the 2nd sentence, it says 'UserDefineFunction' instead of 'UserDefinedFunction'.
On 1/3/20 11:29 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
2.5.0-rc2.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
[ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve
--
Best Regards
Lola K.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by "Beckerle, Mike" <mb...@tresys.com>.
I also tested these schemas that are not publicly available but several of which are part of our interoperability story with the IBM DFDL implementation, as they are portable to IBM DFDL, so it is useful to verify that they still are portable.
agnosc_remedy
army_drrs_lh
cef
disv6
DyNAMO-Link16
gmtif
iCalendar
imf_iCalendar_cse
nato-stanag-5516
uscg_ucop_lh
usmtf
vmf
The following 2 schemas did not work, but I am not expecting them to, for lack of proper test setup
jreap - requires a specific link16 schema that I don't have.
vmf_s2s - needs mil-std-2045 version 0.0.4 (which is old/stale now)
________________________________
From: Beckerle, Mike <mb...@tresys.com>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 11:30 AM
To: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>; dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
+1
I insured the release builds and tests locally without error.
I tested these published DFDLSchemas (on github) to insure they work with RC2
bmp
cobol1
CSV
EDIFACT
geonames
gif
HL7
IBM4690-TLOG
ipfix
ISO8583
jpeg
MagVar
mil-std-2045
NACHA
NITF
PCAP
png
quasiXML
utf8test
vCard
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 9:10 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Please remember to list out what things you checked.
We were good about this for the last release, we should keep it up. For
reference, the vote thread for last release:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/baa7ec2c94e1ac1a2cf786a5e1f9d8c3d0253b7d944420767e42ebbf%40%3Cdev.daffodil.apache.org%3E
On 1/6/20 8:58 AM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> +1 from me.
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 11:29 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
> 2.5.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by "Beckerle, Mike" <mb...@tresys.com>.
+1
I insured the release builds and tests locally without error.
I tested these published DFDLSchemas (on github) to insure they work with RC2
bmp
cobol1
CSV
EDIFACT
geonames
gif
HL7
IBM4690-TLOG
ipfix
ISO8583
jpeg
MagVar
mil-std-2045
NACHA
NITF
PCAP
png
quasiXML
utf8test
vCard
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2020 9:10 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Please remember to list out what things you checked.
We were good about this for the last release, we should keep it up. For
reference, the vote thread for last release:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/baa7ec2c94e1ac1a2cf786a5e1f9d8c3d0253b7d944420767e42ebbf%40%3Cdev.daffodil.apache.org%3E
On 1/6/20 8:58 AM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> +1 from me.
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 11:29 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
> 2.5.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
Please remember to list out what things you checked.
We were good about this for the last release, we should keep it up. For
reference, the vote thread for last release:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/baa7ec2c94e1ac1a2cf786a5e1f9d8c3d0253b7d944420767e42ebbf%40%3Cdev.daffodil.apache.org%3E
On 1/6/20 8:58 AM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> +1 from me.
> ________________________________
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 11:29 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
> 2.5.0-rc2.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Posted by "Beckerle, Mike" <mb...@tresys.com>.
+1 from me.
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 11:29 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.5.0-rc2
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
2.5.0-rc2.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.5.0-rc2/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1012/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.5.0-rc2.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.5.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.5.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.5.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday 6 January, 2020, 11:30 AM EST).
[ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve