You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2010/09/10 14:04:45 UTC
[VOTE] release javamail 1.8.2 provider and mail components.
This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp
provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages. The
JIRA in question is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587
This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar. This
fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. .
The 2 components up for vote are:
org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar
org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar
from the staging repository at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/
The source repo is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Rick
[CANCELED] [VOTE] release javamail 1.8.2 provider and mail components.
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Will restart the vote with a version built using java 5.
Rick
On 9/10/2010 8:04 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp
> provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages.
> The JIRA in question is
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587
>
> This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar. This
> fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. .
>
> The 2 components up for vote are:
>
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar
>
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar
>
>
> from the staging repository at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/
>
> The source repo is:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Rick
>
Re: [VOTE] release javamail 1.8.2 provider and mail components.
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
I agree with Ivan. We should use JDK1.5 to build the binaries.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am thinking that we should build it by jdk 1.5.
>
> 2010/9/14 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
> Rick,
>> Source, signature, checksum, build -- all look good. Here's my +1.
>>
>> One note, your source release is:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.tar.gz
>> or
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.zip
>>
>> Your note refers to the source jars that are, IMO, not appropriate as
>> release artifacts. The above artifact (tar.gz) is what I've reviewed and am
>> voting on.
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>> > This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp
>> provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages. The
>> JIRA in question is
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587
>> >
>> > This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar. This
>> fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. .
>> >
>> > The 2 components up for vote are:
>> >
>> >
>> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar
>> >
>> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar
>> >
>> > from the staging repository at:
>> >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/
>> >
>> > The source repo is:
>> >
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> >
>> > Rick
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
--
Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] release javamail 1.8.2 provider and mail components.
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
I am thinking that we should build it by jdk 1.5.
2010/9/14 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> Rick,
> Source, signature, checksum, build -- all look good. Here's my +1.
>
> One note, your source release is:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.tar.gz
> or
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.zip
>
> Your note refers to the source jars that are, IMO, not appropriate as
> release artifacts. The above artifact (tar.gz) is what I've reviewed and am
> voting on.
>
> --kevan
>
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> > This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp
> provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages. The
> JIRA in question is
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587
> >
> > This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar. This
> fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. .
> >
> > The 2 components up for vote are:
> >
> >
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar
> >
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar
> >
> > from the staging repository at:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/
> >
> > The source repo is:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Rick
> >
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] release javamail 1.8.2 provider and mail components.
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Rick,
Source, signature, checksum, build -- all look good. Here's my +1.
One note, your source release is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.tar.gz
or
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.zip
Your note refers to the source jars that are, IMO, not appropriate as release artifacts. The above artifact (tar.gz) is what I've reviewed and am voting on.
--kevan
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages. The JIRA in question is
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587
>
> This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar. This fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. .
>
> The 2 components up for vote are:
>
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar
>
> from the staging repository at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/
>
> The source repo is:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Rick
>