You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@gora.apache.org by "Kevin Ratnasekera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/05/02 09:01:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (GORA-385) Check if GORA-270 and GORA-275 should
remain or be reverted
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Kevin Ratnasekera updated GORA-385:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.9)
1.0
> Check if GORA-270 and GORA-275 should remain or be reverted
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GORA-385
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-385
> Project: Apache Gora
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Renato Javier MarroquĂn Mogrovejo
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> For using Gora in a MR job, it needs io.serializations to be set with org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.WritableSerialization, org.apache.hadoop.io.serializer.JavaSerialization, and it should be only done once (whether as part of the cluster configuration, or as part of the job). This means that for a Hadoop job all Gora-related data will be serialized in a specific manner.
> By accepting GORA-270 and GORA-275,we need to pass this Hadoop configuration with every single query object, which doesn't make sense as this is a Hadoop configuration and not a Gora configuration. This led to brake the integration with Giraph, right now a query object can't be generic, it has to pass the configuration even though this configuration has already been set for the whole job.
> The configuration object does not contain anything related to Gora and I think that was the reason why it was static. I think we should revert this, create a test for showing that we need this, and put it back if needed.
> We should create a test create to confirm GORA-270 and if non can be found, then we should revert them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)