You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Vjeran Marcinko (JIRA)" <de...@tapestry.apache.org> on 2008/01/05 07:10:34 UTC

[jira] Commented: (TAPESTRY-2020) java.lang properties should be coerced to null

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12556179#action_12556179 ] 

Vjeran Marcinko commented on TAPESTRY-2020:
-------------------------------------------

If anyone cares, I strongly agree on this. Null vale is totally meaningful value which means absence of some value. I use it constantly in my apps to test whether some optional property has been set or not. I don't see any reason why number properties would be treated differently. 

> java.lang properties should be coerced to null
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAPESTRY-2020
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2020
>             Project: Tapestry
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: tapestry-ioc
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.7
>            Reporter: Hugo Palma
>
> Type coercion automatically coerces null objects of type like Integer and Double to 0. 
> I don't think that in most cases this is the desired behaviour. null is definitely different from 0 so Tapestry is loosing information in the middle.
> My suggestion is that the types in java.lang when null should be coerced to null. The collection type should be coerced to empty collections like they currently are.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org