You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/05/19 05:28:38 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-10613) Potential Resource Leaks in
FileSystem.CACHE
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14001359#comment-14001359 ]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HADOOP-10613:
----------------------------------------------
> ... If every time i use a new UGI object to invoke FileSystem.get(conf) and never invoke FileSystem's close method,this issue will raise.
...
Is it similar to if an application open a lot of (local) files but not closing them, or open a lot of sockets but not closing them? I think the application is responsible to call close() for releasing the resource in such cases.
> Potential Resource Leaks in FileSystem.CACHE
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10613
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10613
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: 2.4.0
> Reporter: Nemon Lou
>
> There is no size limit of the hashmap in FileSystem.CACHE, which can cause a potential memory leak.
> If every time i use a new UGI object to invoke FileSystem.get(conf) and never invoke FileSystem's close method,this issue will raise.
> If there is a size limit of the hashmap or changing fileSystem instances to soft reference,then user's code don't need to consider too much about the cache leak issues.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)