You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2008/02/22 14:52:43 UTC
Re: JBoss deployer support from codehaus
What about raising this problem on legal-discuss and see what it gives ?
Chris, do you want to take a stab at it ?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Chris Custine <cc...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes sorry, JBoss is LGPL. We do actually import JBoss classes in JBIService
> and JBIDeployer but all LGPL dependencies are marked as provided in the
> pom.xml. So when we ship binaries, they are free from LGPL code, and when a
> developer builds on their own machine, they are downloading the JBoss jars
> from maven central themselves so at least we aren't shipping any LGPL code.
>
> Obviously we will want to run this through legal-discuss if we get that far,
> but I wanted to see if anyone was interested in the first place.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 12:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As David said, I'd be really happy to bring it back in our main svn repo
> > if
> > possible.
> > The main problem is the legal aspects.
> > One thing is that IIRC (but it should be easy to confirm) is that we don't
> > actually
> > have any dependenies on JBoss code, because the SAR we build does not
> > require any API or so (only the SAR descriptor).
> > In such a case, I think we would be ok to import it.
> >
> > And to answer David's question, JBoss is LGPL.
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2008 5:18 AM, Chris Custine <cc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I have noticed several questions recently regarding the JBoss deployer
> > > code
> > > that is at codehaus and after looking into the code a bit I am wondering
> > > if
> > > anyone is interested in moving that to Apache under the platforms module
> > > similar to the geronimo plugins. One of the main reasons that the
> > > deployer
> > > is not working with 3.2 or 3.3 is that the dependencies (specifically
> > > exclusions of transient deps from servicemix-core) are specific to each
> > > ServiceMix release and the current JBoss deployer code is specific to
> > > 3.1.2.
> > > I have fixed the issues locally to make things work with 3.2 and 3.3,
> > but
> > > while I am at it I wanted to see if moving it to the ServiceMix SVN was
> > > something worth exploring.
> > >
> > > I looked into the whole GPL issue and since we are only compiling
> > against
> > > GPL code that is available on maven central repo and not shipping or
> > > packaging any GPL code, I believe there are no issues with licensing.
> > >
> > > This is just an idea, so any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chris
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
> > ------------------------
> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: JBoss deployer support from codehaus
Posted by Chris Custine <cc...@apache.org>.
I sent an email to legal-discuss this morning, so hopefully we can get a
definitive resolution this week.
Chris
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about raising this problem on legal-discuss and see what it gives ?
> Chris, do you want to take a stab at it ?
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Chris Custine <cc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Yes sorry, JBoss is LGPL. We do actually import JBoss classes in
> JBIService
> > and JBIDeployer but all LGPL dependencies are marked as provided in the
> > pom.xml. So when we ship binaries, they are free from LGPL code, and
> when a
> > developer builds on their own machine, they are downloading the JBoss
> jars
> > from maven central themselves so at least we aren't shipping any LGPL
> code.
> >
> > Obviously we will want to run this through legal-discuss if we get that
> far,
> > but I wanted to see if anyone was interested in the first place.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2008 12:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > As David said, I'd be really happy to bring it back in our main svn
> repo
> > > if
> > > possible.
> > > The main problem is the legal aspects.
> > > One thing is that IIRC (but it should be easy to confirm) is that we
> don't
> > > actually
> > > have any dependenies on JBoss code, because the SAR we build does not
> > > require any API or so (only the SAR descriptor).
> > > In such a case, I think we would be ok to import it.
> > >
> > > And to answer David's question, JBoss is LGPL.
> > >
> > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:18 AM, Chris Custine <cc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have noticed several questions recently regarding the JBoss
> deployer
> > > > code
> > > > that is at codehaus and after looking into the code a bit I am
> wondering
> > > > if
> > > > anyone is interested in moving that to Apache under the platforms
> module
> > > > similar to the geronimo plugins. One of the main reasons that the
> > > > deployer
> > > > is not working with 3.2 or 3.3 is that the dependencies
> (specifically
> > > > exclusions of transient deps from servicemix-core) are specific to
> each
> > > > ServiceMix release and the current JBoss deployer code is specific
> to
> > > > 3.1.2.
> > > > I have fixed the issues locally to make things work with 3.2 and
> 3.3,
> > > but
> > > > while I am at it I wanted to see if moving it to the ServiceMix SVN
> was
> > > > something worth exploring.
> > > >
> > > > I looked into the whole GPL issue and since we are only compiling
> > > against
> > > > GPL code that is available on maven central repo and not shipping
> or
> > > > packaging any GPL code, I believe there are no issues with
> licensing.
> > > >
> > > > This is just an idea, so any thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > > ------------------------
> > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>