Re: Comparison of Apache Camel and IBM Integration Bus v9.0

[jamie3 <ja...@gmail.com>]

Here is the second post in the series.

http://beertechcode.blogspot.ca/2015/05/the-30000-foot-view-of-apache-camel-and.html




--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Apache-Camel-and-IBM-Integration-Bus-v9-0-tp5766171p5766563.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Comparison of Apache Camel and IBM Integration Bus v9.0

[jamie3 <ja...@gmail.com>]

http://beertechcode.blogspot.ca/2015/05/my-first-experiences-with-camel-and-iib9.html



--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Apache-Camel-and-IBM-Integration-Bus-v9-0-tp5766171p5767125.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Comparison of Apache Camel and IBM Integration Bus v9.0

[jamie3 <ja...@gmail.com>]

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=7490556759974154576#editor/target=post;postID=8340010403315101673;onPublishedMenu=allposts;onClosedMenu=allposts;postNum=0;src=postname



--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Apache-Camel-and-IBM-Integration-Bus-v9-0-tp5766171p5767124.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Comparison of Apache Camel and IBM Integration Bus v9.0

[jamie3 <ja...@gmail.com>]

I absolutely agree. I do mention this in my blog post. And if you read my
second post I mentioned I will be discussing things such as Camel + Apache
Service Mix and other technologies. 

Also the point of the blog is really to offer people a comparison between
both offerings, even though camel is not an ESB it shares many similar
things to IB9, e.g. Patterins/Components/etc... so I want to dive deep into
this.

Not everyone needs an ESB and Camel is a great alternative IMO.

I will make sure I update that statement to include Karaf/ServiceMix and
ActiveMQ as well, just to make sure people aren't confused.

Cheers



--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Apache-Camel-and-IBM-Integration-Bus-v9-0-tp5766171p5766578.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Comparison of Apache Camel and IBM Integration Bus v9.0

[Morgan Hautman <mo...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

I think for the most part you did a good job but IMHO I really don't 
understand how you can make a comparison of both when you say :

Since IB9 is a full fledged ESB, it allows developers to deploy their 
routing and mediation logic onto integration nodes which host 
integration servers across the enterprise. This is an extremely powerful 
offering as it makes it easy for teams to *hot deploy* their integration 
solutions very easily without having to worry about painful class 
loading issues that driven me mad in IBM WebSphere *Application Server*.

You're talking about an application Server of IBM and you compare it to 
Camel.. This is so wrong.

You should blog about ServiceMix (or Apache Camel - Apache Karaf - 
Apache ActiveMQ -...) and not only focus on Apache Camel to get the 
whole picture.

Regards,
Morgan

On 1/05/2015 6:03, jamie3 wrote:
> Here is the second post in the series.
>
> http://beertechcode.blogspot.ca/2015/05/the-30000-foot-view-of-apache-camel-and.html
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Apache-Camel-and-IBM-Integration-Bus-v9-0-tp5766171p5766563.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.