You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Wang XL (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/05 13:42:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HDFS-13657) INodeId's LAST_RESERVED_ID may not as
expected and the comment is misleading
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Wang XL updated HDFS-13657:
---------------------------
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
> INodeId's LAST_RESERVED_ID may not as expected and the comment is misleading
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-13657
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-13657
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: namenode
> Reporter: Wang XL
> Priority: Trivial
>
> The comment of class INodeId is misleading. In the comment, Id 1 to 1000 are reserved for potential future usage, but code\{{public static final long LAST_RESERVED_ID = 2 << 14 - 1}} will result 1 to 16384 are reserved. At the same time , operator '-' priority is higher than '<<', \{{2 << 14 - 1}} is not equal to \{{(2 <<14) - 1}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org