Can someone comment on the mod_jk stickyness?

["Gonyou, Austin" <au...@coremetrics.com>]

I'd really like some feedback around this, even if I have to go to another
list to get it, that's fine, I just would like someone to respond and let me
know if mod_jk can't work like I've described I would like. 

Thanks much.
Austin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Can someone comment on the mod_jk stickyness?

[Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>]

AFAIK, the stickyness works fine with Apache using the "worker" MPM.  It may
or may not work with the "windows" MPM (I don't use Windows for this).
AFAIK, with the "pre-fork" MPM stickyness currently doesn't work (but the
additions to Jk2 to get it to work are relatively small, and patches are
always welcome :).  I believe that the "pre-fork" MPM only supports
fail-over at the moment.

For Apache 1.3.x users, "pre-fork" is roughly what you get with *nix boxes
(and the same analysis should apply).

"Gonyou, Austin" <au...@coremetrics.com> wrote in message
news:85063BBE668FD411944400D0B744267A88887B@ausmail.core.coremetrics.com...
> I'd really like some feedback around this, even if I have to go to another
> list to get it, that's fine, I just would like someone to respond and let
me
> know if mod_jk can't work like I've described I would like.
>
> Thanks much.
> Austin




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-user-help@jakarta.apache.org