Question regarding the logging documentation

[Samuel Doyle <sa...@gmail.com>]

The examples here: http://cxf.apache.org/docs/configuration.html

Why is there the difference for the plain Spring example and the custom CXF
bean example for the last property.

The plain Spring example has:

<property name="outFaultInterceptors">
   <list>
      <ref bean="logOutbound"/>
   </list>
</property>



and the custom CXF bean has:

<cxf:inFaultInterceptors>
   <ref bean="logOutbound"/>
</cxf:inFaultInterceptors>


Is this correct? Shouldn't it be cxf:outFaultInterceptors and not in* ?

Thanks, S.D.

Re: Question regarding the logging documentation

[Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>]

On Wednesday 15 September 2010 5:38:07 pm Samuel Doyle wrote:
> The examples here: http://cxf.apache.org/docs/configuration.html
> 
> Why is there the difference for the plain Spring example and the custom CXF
> bean example for the last property.
> 
> The plain Spring example has:
> 
> <property name="outFaultInterceptors">
>    <list>
>       <ref bean="logOutbound"/>
>    </list>
> </property>
> 
> 
> 
> and the custom CXF bean has:
> 
> <cxf:inFaultInterceptors>
>    <ref bean="logOutbound"/>
> </cxf:inFaultInterceptors>
> 
> 
> Is this correct? Shouldn't it be cxf:outFaultInterceptors and not in* ?

Well, the docs are definitely wrong on something.  :-)  I'll fix.

For the inFaultInterceptors, you would need the logInbound, not outbound.   
For outFaultInterceptors, you would use the logOutbound.

It really depends on the context of where you are configuring.   For a client 
only application, you would need the inFaultInterceptors for the incoming 
faults from the server.   On a server side only application, you would need 
the outFaultInterceptors.   

Dan


> 
> Thanks, S.D.

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog