Re: mirror sites

[Brian Behlendorf <br...@hyperreal.org>]

Singly stepped up and offered to help keep track of which mirror sites were
out of date.  I thought I'd cc the new-httpd list to let folks know we're
addressing this.

At 08:16 AM 7/24/98 +0200, Singly Bertrand de (X1995) wrote:
>>  If you do a scan, then come back two days later and the same site is still
>> down, then it should safely be removed.
>ok I'll do that in the future
>
>here are the sites which are "old" (still speaking of Apache 1.3.0) at the
>time I write this e-mail (06:00 GMT)

I say give them 3 days.  I notice many of the ones you gave in your list
now have 1.3.1.

>here are sites speaking of Apache 1.2.6 :(
>http://apache.iquest.net/

I've notified the owner and removed him.

>here is a site which uses a frame (advertising) but mentions 1.3.1 
>http://www.cge-ol.fr/apache/

Since they're the only one in France, and it's a very small small ad
outside of our pages and our color scheme and all that, it seems OK... 

>http://apache.bot-shells.com/dist/ should be replaced with
>http://apache.bot-shells.com/ (and mentions 1.3.0)

I've fixed the reference, add them to your "check them tomorrow" list.

>http://foobar.szabinet.hu/apache/

Got through to this one, got redirected to
ftp://ftp.szabinet.hu/pub/www/apache/index.html, which is not cool, as it
should be through HTTP.  So I moved them to the FTP list, but they should
still be checked since they say 1.3.0.

>http://www.cs.riubon.ac.th/pub/apache/

found this, but it has 1.3.0, so check it again tomorrow.

>here are sites "not found" which were already not found in my mail from
>yesterday :
>
>http://apache.ub.net.id/pub/apache/
>http://apache.nobreak.com/
>http://www.maximpact.net/apache/
>http://www.cs.riubon.ac.th/pub/apache/
>http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz/web/apache/
>http://www.uuserv.net.tw/apache/

I've removed them all, and notified the appropriate parties.

>seems like you'll have some work ;)
>perhaps I should wait more than 24 hours to say a site is out of date...
>
>to perform my check I do the following
>(before) installation & configuration of htdig (2 hacks of c because of my
>gcc Digital, and another one to handle my proxy)
>1. run the script (htdig)
>2. parse the logs with "Not found" or by size (3539 is 1.3.1, 3634 is
>1.3.0, ...)
>
>that's why I plan to runs the script 2 days after each release

Sounds OK to me.

	Brian


--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices  |     brian@apache.org
acquired by the age of eighteen." - Einstein   |  brian@hyperreal.org