You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltaspike.apache.org by "Mark Struberg (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/11/10 19:02:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-1367) JNDI Config Source should
support alternate JNDI base names
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mark Struberg resolved DELTASPIKE-1367.
---------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
> JNDI Config Source should support alternate JNDI base names
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DELTASPIKE-1367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1367
> Project: DeltaSpike
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 1.9.0
> Reporter: John Schneider
> Assignee: Mark Struberg
> Priority: Major
>
> JNDI Config is hard-coded to only support "java:comp/env/deltaspike/" as a base name. This doesn't work for EAR deployments where we must have the DeltaSpike jars deployed in top-level app lib directory with JNDI resource reference in application.xml, for which name prefix is java:app/env
> Furthermore, it's sometimes desirable to have server-level config, such as for ProjectStage. For example, a JNDI name java:global/env/deltaspike/org.apache.deltaspike/ProjectStage might be defined at the server level configuration.
> I understand a custom config source can be created to overcome this. However, the standard JNDI config source should be more flexible.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)