You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by 李玉...@163,
18...@163.com on 2016/12/10 13:39:51 UTC
IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Hi
IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in septemberwhy did
not merge into the 1.8 version?
Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Posted by 李玉...@163,
18...@163.com.
Semen Boikov,
This issue is very important to our development environment, we have now
used other techniques to replace.
I very much hope that this patch can be merged into the next version,
very grateful!
\u5728 2016/12/13 16:18, Semyon Boikov \u5199\u9053:
> Hi,
>
> We had a lot of more priority issues so I somehow missed IGNITE-3732. As a
> workaround it is possible to create special thread pool and when message is
> sent to local node execute message listener there instead of
> IgniteMessaging usage.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Alright, looks like I confused it with some other task initially.
>>
>> The ticket you\u2019re talking about is still under review and looks abandoned
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727>
>>
>> Dmitriy G., Sam, is the ticket ready for the merge?
>>
>> \u2014
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 6:29 PM, \u674e\u7389\u73cf@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Denis\uff0c
>>>
>>> I found the branch 3727:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-3727-2
>>>
>>> But it appear that the code is not merged into the master?
>>>
>>> for example, IgniteMessagingImpl.java,the related code is still an old
>> version,8 months ago.
>>>
>>> \u5728 2016/12/10 22:56, Denis Magda \u5199\u9053:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It was released in 1.8. I\u2019ve just checked git logs.
>>>>
>>>> How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on
>> your side?
>>>> \u2014
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, \u674e\u7389\u73cf@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi\uff1a
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september\uff0cwhy did
>> not merge into the 1.8 version?
>>>>>
>>
Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Posted by Semyon Boikov <sb...@gridgain.com>.
OK, I'll try to review/merge it today.
Thanks!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:20 PM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
> Semen,
>
>
> Can this issue be merged into version 1.9?
>
>
> 在 2016/12/13 16:18, Semyon Boikov 写道:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We had a lot of more priority issues so I somehow missed IGNITE-3732. As a
>> workaround it is possible to create special thread pool and when message
>> is
>> sent to local node execute message listener there instead of
>> IgniteMessaging usage.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Alright, looks like I confused it with some other task initially.
>>>
>>> The ticket you’re talking about is still under review and looks abandoned
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727 <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727>
>>>
>>> Dmitriy G., Sam, is the ticket ready for the merge?
>>>
>>> —
>>> Denis
>>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 6:29 PM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Denis，
>>>>
>>>> I found the branch 3727:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-3727-2
>>>>
>>>> But it appear that the code is not merged into the master?
>>>>
>>>> for example, IgniteMessagingImpl.java,the related code is still an old
>>>>
>>> version,8 months ago.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 在 2016/12/10 22:56, Denis Magda 写道:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> It was released in 1.8. I’ve just checked git logs.
>>>>>
>>>>> How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on
>>>>>
>>>> your side?
>>>
>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi：
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september，why did
>>>>>>
>>>>> not merge into the 1.8 version?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Posted by 李玉...@163,
18...@163.com.
Semen,
Can this issue be merged into version 1.9?
\u5728 2016/12/13 16:18, Semyon Boikov \u5199\u9053:
> Hi,
>
> We had a lot of more priority issues so I somehow missed IGNITE-3732. As a
> workaround it is possible to create special thread pool and when message is
> sent to local node execute message listener there instead of
> IgniteMessaging usage.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Alright, looks like I confused it with some other task initially.
>>
>> The ticket you\u2019re talking about is still under review and looks abandoned
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727>
>>
>> Dmitriy G., Sam, is the ticket ready for the merge?
>>
>> \u2014
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 6:29 PM, \u674e\u7389\u73cf@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Denis\uff0c
>>>
>>> I found the branch 3727:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-3727-2
>>>
>>> But it appear that the code is not merged into the master?
>>>
>>> for example, IgniteMessagingImpl.java,the related code is still an old
>> version,8 months ago.
>>>
>>> \u5728 2016/12/10 22:56, Denis Magda \u5199\u9053:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It was released in 1.8. I\u2019ve just checked git logs.
>>>>
>>>> How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on
>> your side?
>>>> \u2014
>>>> Denis
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, \u674e\u7389\u73cf@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi\uff1a
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september\uff0cwhy did
>> not merge into the 1.8 version?
>>>>>
>>
Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Posted by Semyon Boikov <sb...@gridgain.com>.
Hi,
We had a lot of more priority issues so I somehow missed IGNITE-3732. As a
workaround it is possible to create special thread pool and when message is
sent to local node execute message listener there instead of
IgniteMessaging usage.
Thanks
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Alright, looks like I confused it with some other task initially.
>
> The ticket you’re talking about is still under review and looks abandoned
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727>
>
> Dmitriy G., Sam, is the ticket ready for the merge?
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Dec 10, 2016, at 6:29 PM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> > Denis，
> >
> > I found the branch 3727:
> >
> > https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-3727-2
> >
> > But it appear that the code is not merged into the master?
> >
> > for example, IgniteMessagingImpl.java,the related code is still an old
> version,8 months ago.
> >
> >
> > 在 2016/12/10 22:56, Denis Magda 写道:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It was released in 1.8. I’ve just checked git logs.
> >>
> >> How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on
> your side?
> >>
> >> —
> >> Denis
> >>
> >>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi：
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september，why did
> not merge into the 1.8 version?
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Alright, looks like I confused it with some other task initially.
The ticket you’re talking about is still under review and looks abandoned
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3727>
Dmitriy G., Sam, is the ticket ready for the merge?
—
Denis
> On Dec 10, 2016, at 6:29 PM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Denis，
>
> I found the branch 3727:
>
> https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-3727-2
>
> But it appear that the code is not merged into the master?
>
> for example, IgniteMessagingImpl.java,the related code is still an old version,8 months ago.
>
>
> 在 2016/12/10 22:56, Denis Magda 写道:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It was released in 1.8. I’ve just checked git logs.
>>
>> How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on your side?
>>
>> —
>> Denis
>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi：
>>>
>>>
>>> IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september，why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
>>>
>>>
>
Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Posted by 李玉...@163,
18...@163.com.
Denis\uff0c
I found the branch 3727:
https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite/tree/ignite-3727-2
But it appear that the code is not merged into the master?
for example, IgniteMessagingImpl.java,the related code is still an old
version,8 months ago.
\u5728 2016/12/10 22:56, Denis Magda \u5199\u9053:
> Hi,
>
> It was released in 1.8. I\u2019ve just checked git logs.
>
> How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on your side?
>
> \u2014
> Denis
>
>> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, \u674e\u7389\u73cf@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi\uff1a
>>
>>
>> IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september\uff0cwhy did not merge into the 1.8 version?
>>
>>
Re: IGNITE-3727： why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
Hi,
It was released in 1.8. I’ve just checked git logs.
How did you come up with such a conclusion? Something doesn't work on your side?
—
Denis
> On Dec 10, 2016, at 5:39 AM, 李玉珏@163 <18...@163.com> wrote:
>
> Hi：
>
>
> IGNITE-3727,this issue has been fixed and tested in september，why did not merge into the 1.8 version?
>
>