You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by "Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21)" <al...@credit-suisse.com> on 2005/07/22 14:18:56 UTC

RE: Contribution of component library planned, live demo availabl e

-----Original Message-----
So neither way is optimal.
-----/Original Message-----

That's why there should be a configuration switch to allow or not
the use of javascript in a component.

And whether the JS-enabled features should be called advanced? 
I have my own way of thinking about that. But I am known
in my office as the dinosaur that considers 3270 as the 
best user-interface ever designed ;-)

regards
Alexander

Re: Contribution of component library planned, live demo availabl e

Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>.
There are sometimes situations when such a switch is not possible,
all you can do is to program the component non intrusive so that
it basically does not do anything if such a switch is triggered.



Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> So neither way is optimal.
> -----/Original Message-----
> 
> That's why there should be a configuration switch to allow or not
> the use of javascript in a component.
> 
> And whether the JS-enabled features should be called advanced? 
> I have my own way of thinking about that. But I am known
> in my office as the dinosaur that considers 3270 as the 
> best user-interface ever designed ;-)
> 
> regards
> Alexander
>