You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@drill.apache.org by "Laurent Goujon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/12/02 19:40:58 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (DRILL-5094) Assure Comparator to be
transitive
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15716052#comment-15716052 ]
Laurent Goujon edited comment on DRILL-5094 at 12/2/16 7:40 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Long.compareTo() is slightly different as it's not doing any substraction:
{code:java}
public static int compare(long x, long y) {
return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1);
}
{code}
was (Author: laurentgo):
The Long.compareTo() is slightly different as it's not doing any substraction:
```
public static int compare(long x, long y) {
return (x < y) ? -1 : ((x == y) ? 0 : 1);
}
```
> Assure Comparator to be transitive
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-5094
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5094
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Chunhui Shi
> Assignee: Chunhui Shi
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: ready-to-commit
>
> In AssignmentCreator.java, one Comparator could break transitive attribute required for a Comparator implementation and the result is not correct.
> E.g. for:
> long IntPlusOne = 0x80000000L;
> [0]=2 * IntPlusOne + 5, [1] = 2* IntPlusOne + 8, [2] = 4 * IntPlusOne + 4,
> the compare results will be like:
> compare([0],[1]) = -3,
> compare([1],[2]) = 4,
> compare([0],[2]) = 1
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)