You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@brpc.apache.org by tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com> on 2019/12/09 13:33:43 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
Hi, guys,
0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.
The source code can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz
The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02
The SHA-512 checksum is:
ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851
which can be found via:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512
The signature can be found via:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc
KEYS file is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
[Release Note]
* Fix many license related issues
* Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
* Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
* Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
* Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
* bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
* String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
* Support for bilibili discovery service
* Improved CircuitBreaker
* grpc impl. supports timeout
Please vote on releasing this package as:
Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Checklist for reference:
[ ]Are release files in correct location?
[ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
[ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
[ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
[ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
[ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
[ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
[ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or NOTICE?
[ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
[ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
[ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
[ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
[ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE file?
[ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
[ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version control?
[ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
[ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please
feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
Posted by Gosling Von <fe...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE is fine comparing to the last version
p.s It would be best to collect together two or three votes from your our mentor@Kevin @JB before call for vote in IPMC mail list.
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:33 PM, tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, guys,
>
>
>
> 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.
>
>
> The source code can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz
>
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02
>
>
> The SHA-512 checksum is:
>
> ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851
>
>
>
> which can be found via:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512
>
>
>
> The signature can be found via:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc
>
>
>
> KEYS file is available here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
>
>
>
>
>
> [Release Note]
>
>
>
> * Fix many license related issues
> * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
> * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
> * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
> * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
> * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
> * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
> * Support for bilibili discovery service
> * Improved CircuitBreaker
> * grpc impl. supports timeout
>
>
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as:
>
> Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
>
>
>
> This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
>
> passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
>
> cast.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
>
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Checklist for reference:
> [ ]Are release files in correct location?
> [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or NOTICE?
> [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
> [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE file?
> [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
> [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version control?
> [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
>
>
>
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please
>
> feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
>
> Thanks
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@brpc.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
Posted by Gosling Von <fe...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE is fine comparing the last version
- no unexpected binary files
p.s It would be best to collect together two or three votes from your our mentor@kevin before call for vote in IPMC mail list.
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
> On Dec 9, 2019, at 9:33 PM, tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, guys,
>
>
>
> 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.
>
>
> The source code can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz
>
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02
>
>
> The SHA-512 checksum is:
>
> ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851
>
>
>
> which can be found via:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512
>
>
>
> The signature can be found via:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc
>
>
>
> KEYS file is available here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
>
>
>
>
>
> [Release Note]
>
>
>
> * Fix many license related issues
> * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
> * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
> * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
> * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
> * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
> * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
> * Support for bilibili discovery service
> * Improved CircuitBreaker
> * grpc impl. supports timeout
>
>
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as:
>
> Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
>
>
>
> This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
>
> passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
>
> cast.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
>
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Checklist for reference:
> [ ]Are release files in correct location?
> [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or NOTICE?
> [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
> [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE file?
> [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
> [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version control?
> [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
>
>
>
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please
>
> feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
>
> Thanks
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@brpc.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@brpc.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
Posted by Bear Jiang <jr...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:56 AM JiashunZhu <zh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 binding.
> I have checked:
>
> - DISCLAIMER present
>
> - Signature and hashes okay
>
> - NOTICE present
>
> - No unexpected binary files
>
> - Built on the latest(10.15.2) MacOS
>
> James Ge <jg...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月19日周四 上午11:26写道：
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:33 PM tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, guys,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.
> > >
> > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache
> > > brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.
> > >
> > >
> > > The source code can be found at:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz
> > >
> > >
> > > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02,
> available
> > > here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02
> > >
> > >
> > > The SHA-512 checksum is:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > which can be found via:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The signature can be found via:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > KEYS file is available here:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Release Note]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > * Fix many license related issues
> > > * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
> > > * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
> > > * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
> > > * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
> > > * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
> > > * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
> > > * Support for bilibili discovery service
> > > * Improved CircuitBreaker
> > > * grpc impl. supports timeout
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing this package as:
> > >
> > > Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
> > >
> > > passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
> > >
> > > cast.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package
> > >
> > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Checklist for reference:
> > > [ ]Are release files in correct location?
> > > [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > > [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > > [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> > > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> > > NOTICE?
> > > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> > > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> > > [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> > > file?
> > > [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
> > > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> > > control?
> > > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > > [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers,
> please
> > >
> > > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jiashun Zhu
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
Posted by JiashunZhu <zh...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding.
I have checked:
- DISCLAIMER present
- Signature and hashes okay
- NOTICE present
- No unexpected binary files
- Built on the latest(10.15.2) MacOS
James Ge <jg...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月19日周四 上午11:26写道：
> +1 binding
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:33 PM tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, guys,
> >
> >
> >
> > 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.
> >
> > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache
> > brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.
> >
> >
> > The source code can be found at:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz
> >
> >
> > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available
> > here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02
> >
> >
> > The SHA-512 checksum is:
> >
> >
> >
> ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851
> >
> >
> >
> > which can be found via:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512
> >
> >
> >
> > The signature can be found via:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc
> >
> >
> >
> > KEYS file is available here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Release Note]
> >
> >
> >
> > * Fix many license related issues
> > * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
> > * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
> > * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
> > * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
> > * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
> > * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
> > * Support for bilibili discovery service
> > * Improved CircuitBreaker
> > * grpc impl. supports timeout
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as:
> >
> > Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
> >
> >
> >
> > This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
> >
> > passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
> >
> > cast.
> >
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package
> >
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> >
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> > Checklist for reference:
> > [ ]Are release files in correct location?
> > [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> > NOTICE?
> > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> > [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> > file?
> > [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
> > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> > control?
> > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please
> >
> > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
--
Jiashun Zhu
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
Posted by 牟盖东 <mo...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
James Ge <jg...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月19日周四 上午11:26写道：
> +1 binding
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:33 PM tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, guys,
> >
> >
> >
> > 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.
> >
> > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache
> > brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.
> >
> >
> > The source code can be found at:
> >
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz
> >
> >
> > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available
> > here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02
> >
> >
> > The SHA-512 checksum is:
> >
> >
> >
> ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851
> >
> >
> >
> > which can be found via:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512
> >
> >
> >
> > The signature can be found via:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc
> >
> >
> >
> > KEYS file is available here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Release Note]
> >
> >
> >
> > * Fix many license related issues
> > * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
> > * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
> > * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
> > * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
> > * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
> > * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
> > * Support for bilibili discovery service
> > * Improved CircuitBreaker
> > * grpc impl. supports timeout
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as:
> >
> > Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
> >
> >
> >
> > This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
> >
> > passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
> >
> > cast.
> >
> >
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package
> >
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> >
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> > Checklist for reference:
> > [ ]Are release files in correct location?
> > [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> > [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> > NOTICE?
> > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> > [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> > file?
> > [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
> > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> > control?
> > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please
> >
> > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
Posted by James Ge <jg...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 9:33 PM tan zhongyi <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
>
>
> 0.9.7-rc02 is ready for vote, here it is.
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache
> brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02.
>
>
> The source code can be found at:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz
>
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.7-rc02, available
> here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.7-rc02
>
>
> The SHA-512 checksum is:
>
>
> ec57b40641734dad8f2ab9629b75a658ef35da5248b1bef8af17298f2722f18106f48d1a4bf2a4f98b2a23d9fa0c727f95863ae762ddb4c67cb02a8848ee0851
>
>
>
> which can be found via:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.sha512
>
>
>
> The signature can be found via:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.7-rc02/incubator-brpc-0.9.7-rc02.tar.gz.asc
>
>
>
> KEYS file is available here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
>
>
>
>
>
> [Release Note]
>
>
>
> * Fix many license related issues
> * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
> * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
> * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
> * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
> * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
> * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
> * Support for bilibili discovery service
> * Improved CircuitBreaker
> * grpc impl. supports timeout
>
>
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as:
>
> Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02
>
>
>
> This vote will be open until “Dec 14 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
>
> passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
>
> cast.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
>
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Checklist for reference:
> [ ]Are release files in correct location?
> [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
> [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
> [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> NOTICE?
> [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
> [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
> [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE
> file?
> [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
> [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> control?
> [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
>
>
>
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please
>
> feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
>
> Thanks
>
>