You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/03 12:30:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11730) Test NodeLost / NodeAdded dynamics

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16309580#comment-16309580 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-11730:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 2da4ed17bae07593233f4e5610ce40a6a07f7c10 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from [~ab]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=2da4ed1 ]

SOLR-11730 Add a nodeLost benchmark.


> Test NodeLost / NodeAdded dynamics
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11730
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11730
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: AutoScaling
>            Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki 
>
> Let's consider a "flaky node" scenario.
> A node is going up and down at short intervals (eg. due to a flaky network cable). If the frequency of these events coincides with {{waitFor}} interval in {{nodeLost}} trigger configuration, the node may never be reported to the autoscaling framework as lost. Similarly it may never be reported as added back if it's lost again within the {{waitFor}} period of {{nodeAdded}} trigger.
> Other scenarios are possible here too, depending on timing:
> * node being constantly reported as lost
> * node being constantly reported as added
> One possible solution for the autoscaling triggers is that the framework should keep a short-term ({{waitFor * 2}} long?) memory of a node state that the trigger is tracking in order to eliminate flaky nodes (ie. those that transitioned between states more than once within the period).
> Situation like this is detrimental to SolrCloud behavior regardless of autoscaling actions, so it should probably be addressed at a node level by eg. shutting down Solr node after the number of disconnects in a time window reaches a certain threshold.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org