Re: [Axis2] Doesn't addressing classes come bundled with axis2-0.91.jar?

[Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>]

IMO: axis2.jar should only contain core, xml, wsdl, common and
addressing.

(The tool jar doesn't play into the runtime right now, right?)

Sanjiva.

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 15:00 +0600, Eran Chinthaka wrote:
> Just fixed it. Take an update and build the jar.
> 
> BTW, we have couple of new modules. Can we come in to conclusion on what 
> to be included and what to be excluded from the axis2 jar file, please ?
> 
> Currently following are in he jar - core, tool, xml, wsdl, saaj, common, 
> addressing
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Chinthaka
> 
> jayachandra wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> > The single jar of all classes that is created inside the target/lib 
> > folder, namely axis2-0.91.jar seems to not include in it the 
> > addressing classes viz. 
> > org.apache.axis2.handlers.addressing.AddressingInHandler
> > Is it by design, just the way axis2-commons is provided seperated?
> > Sorry, if this has been made clear earlier.
> >  
> > Thank you
> > Jaya
> > -- 
> > -- Jaya
> 
> 

Re: [Axis2] Doesn't addressing classes come bundled with axis2-0.91.jar?

[robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>]

On 9/10/05, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:

<snip>

> > it might also be worth considering using uberjar and jarjar to create
> > an absolutely standard release jar contain all dependencies.
> > (axis2-standard.jar, say.)
> 
> If I understand your meaning correctly, I'd think "complete" would be
> better than "standard" for that, but we can work out all the naming
> issues as we move forward.  For now we should decide if indeed we want
> something like jar styles, and get the framework implemented in the
> maven project files.

+1

- robert

Re: [Axis2] Doesn't addressing classes come bundled with axis2-0.91.jar?

[Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>]

Hi Robert!

> (without wanting to ignite naming wars) modes sounds like a very cool
> idea but it may be confusing for users if they are all called
> axis2.jar.

+1

> for example, it might be worth considering whether building with
> 'axis.jarstyle=compact' should create 'axis2-compact.jar'.

Also +1.  I think we should decide on the standard set of stuff that is 
the default build, and make that "axis2.jar", then make the other styles 
named appropriately "axis2-compact.jar", "axis2-jaxws.jar", etc

> it might also be worth considering using uberjar and jarjar to create
> an absolutely standard release jar contain all dependencies.
> (axis2-standard.jar, say.)

If I understand your meaning correctly, I'd think "complete" would be 
better than "standard" for that, but we can work out all the naming 
issues as we move forward.  For now we should decide if indeed we want 
something like jar styles, and get the framework implemented in the 
maven project files.

--Glen

Re: [Axis2] Doesn't addressing classes come bundled with axis2-0.91.jar?

[robert burrell donkin <ro...@gmail.com>]

On 9/9/05, Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com> wrote:
> Is the axis2.jar intended to be minimal, for client use and such? If so,
> it seems like wsdl should be left out, too.

(without wanting to ignite naming wars) modes sounds like a very cool
idea but it may be confusing for users if they are all called
axis2.jar.

for example, it might be worth considering whether building with
'axis.jarstyle=compact' should create 'axis2-compact.jar'.

it might also be worth considering using uberjar and jarjar to create
an absolutely standard release jar contain all dependencies.
(axis2-standard.jar, say.)

- robert

Re: [Axis2] Doesn't addressing classes come bundled with axis2-0.91.jar?

[Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com>]

Is the axis2.jar intended to be minimal, for client use and such? If so, 
it seems like wsdl should be left out, too.

  - Dennis

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>IMO: axis2.jar should only contain core, xml, wsdl, common and
>addressing.
>
>(The tool jar doesn't play into the runtime right now, right?)
>
>Sanjiva.
>
>On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 15:00 +0600, Eran Chinthaka wrote:
>  
>
>>Just fixed it. Take an update and build the jar.
>>
>>BTW, we have couple of new modules. Can we come in to conclusion on what 
>>to be included and what to be excluded from the axis2 jar file, please ?
>>
>>Currently following are in he jar - core, tool, xml, wsdl, saaj, common, 
>>addressing
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Chinthaka
>>
>>jayachandra wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi!
>>>The single jar of all classes that is created inside the target/lib 
>>>folder, namely axis2-0.91.jar seems to not include in it the 
>>>addressing classes viz. 
>>>org.apache.axis2.handlers.addressing.AddressingInHandler
>>>Is it by design, just the way axis2-commons is provided seperated?
>>>Sorry, if this has been made clear earlier.
>>> 
>>>Thank you
>>>Jaya
>>>-- 
>>>-- Jaya
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>