You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Martin Toepfer <ma...@uni-wuerzburg.de> on 2014/02/11 18:24:49 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Hi,
the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.2.0 is ready for voting.
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1007/
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.2.0-rc1
Update site:
http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
Archive with all sources:
http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/ruta-2.2.0-source-release.zip
Overall 52 issues have been fixed for this release.
They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html and here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3609?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.2.0ruta%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29
Major Changes in this Release
UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
- Major performance improvements
- Improved import type functionality and handling of ambiguous short names
- Options to determine where the next match should start
- Requires at least Java 6
- Many bug fixes
UIMA Ruta Workbench:
- Smaller improvements in many views
- Many bug fixes
ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
Documentation (pdf file):
http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/tools.ruta.book.pdf
Please vote on release:
[ ] +1 OK to release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
Thanks.
Martin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Hi,
Am 11.02.2014 20:50, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> (These are probably not release blockers) - When building from the sources, I
> observed:
>
> ruta-ep-engine bundle gives these warnings, probably needs a pom update?
>
> [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.3.7:manifest (uima-bundle) @ ruta-ep-engine ---
> [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
> matching referal for !antlr
> [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
> matching referal for !com.jamonapi
> [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
> matching referal for !org.apache.commons.pool
> [WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
> matching referal for !org.apache.commons.pool.impl
Hmm, I don't think that's a problem. I had to explicitly exclude all
packages in order to get it to work, but afterwards I applied some
cleanups, which probably made these four exclusions redundant. I think I
can remove them again.
> ruta-ep-ide 2.2.0 has antlr warning:
>
> org\apache\uima\ruta\ide\core\parser\RutaParser.g
> warning(200): org\apache\uima\ruta\ide\core\parser\RutaParser.g:2057:2: Decision
> can match input such as "MINUS Identifier" using multiple alternatives: 1, 2
> As a result, alternative(s) 2 were disabled for that input
> Semantic predicates were present but were hidden by actions.
>
> Is this OK?
I have seen that. It is not OK, but also not a big problem. The
consequences are that the AST for numerical difference (hyphen-minus) on
feature match values is broken, and thus the support in the editor,
e.g., semantic highlighting is missing. However, that is only for
something like: ASSIGN(var, Token.end - Token.begin). The actual rule
functionality is not affected. I will create an issue so that I will not
forget to fix it in the next release. If I find the time, I will do it
for the next rc.
>
> I also note that there were quite a few javadoc warnings - some wrong spelling
> for parameter names, @return with no arguments, etc. (We generally try to have
> the public user-facing APIs have good javadocs, but, it's not a blocker IMHO.)
JavaDoc is still a big problem, because it is mostly missing at all. It
was never a top priority for me because ruta is not a java library where
you call different methods. There is an issue for it.
Best,
Peter
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
(These are probably not release blockers) - When building from the sources, I
observed:
ruta-ep-engine bundle gives these warnings, probably needs a pom update?
[INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.3.7:manifest (uima-bundle) @ ruta-ep-engine ---
[WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
matching referal for !antlr
[WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
matching referal for !com.jamonapi
[WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
matching referal for !org.apache.commons.pool
[WARNING] Manifest org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-engine:jar:2.2.0 : Did not find
matching referal for !org.apache.commons.pool.impl
ruta-ep-ide 2.2.0 has antlr warning:
org\apache\uima\ruta\ide\core\parser\RutaParser.g
warning(200): org\apache\uima\ruta\ide\core\parser\RutaParser.g:2057:2: Decision
can match input such as "MINUS Identifier" using multiple alternatives: 1, 2
As a result, alternative(s) 2 were disabled for that input
Semantic predicates were present but were hidden by actions.
Is this OK?
I also note that there were quite a few javadoc warnings - some wrong spelling
for parameter names, @return with no arguments, etc. (We generally try to have
the public user-facing APIs have good javadocs, but, it's not a blocker IMHO.)
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE][CANCEL] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Martin Toepfer <ma...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
...preparing RC2.
Martin
Am 11.02.2014 18:24, schrieb Martin Toepfer:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.2.0 is ready for
> voting.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1007/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.2.0-rc1
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/ruta-2.2.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Overall 52 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3609?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.2.0ruta%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29
>
>
> Major Changes in this Release
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Major performance improvements
> - Improved import type functionality and handling of ambiguous short
> names
> - Options to determine where the next match should start
> - Requires at least Java 6
> - Many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Smaller improvements in many views
> - Many bug fixes
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/tools.ruta.book.pdf
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Martin
>
--
MSc. Martin Toepfer Raum: B008
Universität Würzburg Tel.: +49-(0)931-31-81856
Am Hubland Fax.: -
97074 Würzburg mail: martin.toepfer@uni-wuerzburg.de
www: http://www.is.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/mitarbeiter/toepfer/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Am 13.02.2014 12:53, schrieb Peter Klügl:
>> more testing will follow....
>>
maven artifacts:
ruta-ep-engine-2.2.0-source:
we could probably remove the mention of university of würzburg here
since the artifact does not contains the sources of the fetched
implementations.
-> optionally, not a blocker
ruta-ep-engine-2.2.0:
the notice items that marshall and martin already mentioned
ruta-ep-ide-2.2.0-sources:
contains license for icons, but should not
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
> more testing will follow....
>
Nicolas problem and a small issue I noticed when reproducing it will be
fixed in the next rc.
Peter
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Martin Toepfer <ma...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
There seems to be an extra line end in the signature files that causes
md5sum not to find the target file. I will have a look at it.
Martin
Am 12.02.2014 14:21, schrieb Peter Klügl:
> there are some problems verifying the signatures, but maybe only on my
> machine
>
> more testing will follow....
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
review so far:
compared svn-tag with source release - OK (the usual additional
files/folders)
mvn clean install svn-tag - OK
mvn clean install source-release - OK
(antlr and maven-bundle-plugin warnings will be fixed in next rc)
downloaded kepler sr1
installed UIMA Runtime and Tools 2.5.0 features
installed Ruta Workbench 2.2.0 - OK
(both versions 2.2.0 and 2.1.0 are available)
(name of the update site mentions an absolute path to my workspace?)
created simple project - OK
run simple rule script - OK
import ExampleProject of source-release and run tests - OK
checked default files of source-release - OK
copyright in NOTICE mentions only the start year: Copyright 2011 The
Apache Software Foundation
there are some problems verifying the signatures, but maybe only on my
machine
more testing will follow....
Peter
Am 11.02.2014 18:24, schrieb Martin Toepfer:
> Hi,
>
> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.2.0 is ready for
> voting.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1007/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.2.0-rc1
>
> Update site:
> http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/ruta-2.2.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Overall 52 issues have been fixed for this release.
> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html and here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3609?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.2.0ruta%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Resolved%2C%20Closed%29
>
>
> Major Changes in this Release
>
> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> - Major performance improvements
> - Improved import type functionality and handling of ambiguous short
> names
> - Options to determine where the next match should start
> - Requires at least Java 6
> - Many bug fixes
>
> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> - Smaller improvements in many views
> - Many bug fixes
>
>
> ONLY FOR REVIEWING:
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~mtoepfer/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.0-rc1/tools.ruta.book.pdf
>
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Martin
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Am 13.02.2014 23:30, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> ...
> Here's the reference: https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
That's a very nice page that I missed so far. Thanks :-)
Peter
> Scroll down to the "Dependencies of Dependencies" section, where it says:
> Dependencies of dependencies (including so-called "transitive dependencies") are
> no different from first-order dependencies for the purposes of assembling
> LICENSE and NOTICE: LICENSE and NOTICE need only be modified to accommodate them
> if and only if their bits are bundled.
>
> -Marshall
>> Best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 12.02.2014 15:00, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>> On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Marshall,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
>>>>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
>>>>>> All rights reserved,
>>>>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
>>>>>> Technische Universität Darmstadt.
>>>>>> All rights reserved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some questions
>>>>>> about the NOTICE file in general.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1)
>>>>>> The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
>>>>>> libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the licensing-howto
>>>>>> correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for all of that libraries,
>>>>>> e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
>>>>> Sort of. You have to examine the NOTICE contents and copy up the parts that
>>>>> apply, excluding "This product includes software developed at The Apache
>>>>> Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).", which is already in the file (no
>>>>> need to duplicate this).
>>>>>
>>>>> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2)
>>>>>> As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
>>>>>> project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
>>>>>> instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT is not
>>>>>> delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE file for
>>>>>> ruta-core. Is this correct?
>>>>> Yes. The NOTICE file for a bundled artifact is only for those dependencies that
>>>>> are bundled into the deliverable artifact (in this case, the Jar).
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>>> Thank you for doing the Release Manager work :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 2/13/2014 2:22 PM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Am 13.02.2014 20:02, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> On 2/13/2014 8:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of
>>> AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-legacy-support-2.0.0, but
>>> there is no mention of the IBM UIMA License Agreement because of
>>> jVinci-2.4.2
>> I took a look at the uimaFIT binary download - I don't see that it contains
>> jVinci. I do see that includes the uimaj-core, so it should have had the notice
>> that goes with that "promoted" up, I think.
>
> jVinci is in the extras folder.
>
> It was just an example. As we include uimaFIT-core, I wondered what
> notices we need to reproduce from there...
Here's the reference: https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
Scroll down to the "Dependencies of Dependencies" section, where it says:
Dependencies of dependencies (including so-called "transitive dependencies") are
no different from first-order dependencies for the purposes of assembling
LICENSE and NOTICE: LICENSE and NOTICE need only be modified to accommodate them
if and only if their bits are bundled.
-Marshall
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
>> -Marshall
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 12.02.2014 15:00, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>> On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote:
>>>>> Hi Marshall,
>>>>>
>>>>> to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
>>>>>
>>>>> This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
>>>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
>>>>> All rights reserved,
>>>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
>>>>> Technische Universität Darmstadt.
>>>>> All rights reserved.
>>>>>
>>>>> to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some questions
>>>>> about the NOTICE file in general.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1)
>>>>> The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
>>>>> libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the licensing-howto
>>>>> correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for all of that libraries,
>>>>> e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
>>>> Sort of. You have to examine the NOTICE contents and copy up the parts that
>>>> apply, excluding "This product includes software developed at The Apache
>>>> Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).", which is already in the file (no
>>>> need to duplicate this).
>>>>
>>>> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>>>>
>>>>> 2)
>>>>> As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
>>>>> project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
>>>>> instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT is not
>>>>> delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE file for
>>>>> ruta-core. Is this correct?
>>>> Yes. The NOTICE file for a bundled artifact is only for those dependencies that
>>>> are bundled into the deliverable artifact (in this case, the Jar).
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>>> Thank you for doing the Release Manager work :-)
>>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Am 13.02.2014 20:02, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> On 2/13/2014 8:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of
>> AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-legacy-support-2.0.0, but
>> there is no mention of the IBM UIMA License Agreement because of
>> jVinci-2.4.2
> I took a look at the uimaFIT binary download - I don't see that it contains
> jVinci. I do see that includes the uimaj-core, so it should have had the notice
> that goes with that "promoted" up, I think.
jVinci is in the extras folder.
It was just an example. As we include uimaFIT-core, I wondered what
notices we need to reproduce from there...
Best,
Peter
> -Marshall
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> Am 12.02.2014 15:00, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>> On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote:
>>>> Hi Marshall,
>>>>
>>>> to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
>>>>
>>>> This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
>>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
>>>> All rights reserved,
>>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
>>>> Technische Universität Darmstadt.
>>>> All rights reserved.
>>>>
>>>> to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some questions
>>>> about the NOTICE file in general.
>>>>
>>>> 1)
>>>> The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
>>>> libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the licensing-howto
>>>> correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for all of that libraries,
>>>> e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
>>> Sort of. You have to examine the NOTICE contents and copy up the parts that
>>> apply, excluding "This product includes software developed at The Apache
>>> Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).", which is already in the file (no
>>> need to duplicate this).
>>>
>>> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>>>
>>>> 2)
>>>> As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
>>>> project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
>>>> instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT is not
>>>> delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE file for
>>>> ruta-core. Is this correct?
>>> Yes. The NOTICE file for a bundled artifact is only for those dependencies that
>>> are bundled into the deliverable artifact (in this case, the Jar).
>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help.
>>> Thank you for doing the Release Manager work :-)
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 2/13/2014 8:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file.
>
> Example:
>
> The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of
> AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-legacy-support-2.0.0, but
> there is no mention of the IBM UIMA License Agreement because of
> jVinci-2.4.2
I took a look at the uimaFIT binary download - I don't see that it contains
jVinci. I do see that includes the uimaj-core, so it should have had the notice
that goes with that "promoted" up, I think.
-Marshall
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 12.02.2014 15:00, schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote:
>>> Hi Marshall,
>>>
>>> to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
>>>
>>> This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
>>> All rights reserved,
>>> Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
>>> Technische Universität Darmstadt.
>>> All rights reserved.
>>>
>>> to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some questions
>>> about the NOTICE file in general.
>>>
>>> 1)
>>> The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
>>> libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the licensing-howto
>>> correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for all of that libraries,
>>> e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
>> Sort of. You have to examine the NOTICE contents and copy up the parts that
>> apply, excluding "This product includes software developed at The Apache
>> Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).", which is already in the file (no
>> need to duplicate this).
>>
>> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>>
>>> 2)
>>> As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
>>> project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
>>> instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT is not
>>> delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE file for
>>> ruta-core. Is this correct?
>> Yes. The NOTICE file for a bundled artifact is only for those dependencies that
>> are bundled into the deliverable artifact (in this case, the Jar).
>>
>>> Thanks for your help.
>> Thank you for doing the Release Manager work :-)
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
I still try to understand what needs to be mentioned in the notice file.
Example:
The notice file in the uimaFIT binary download contains a mention of
AnnotationLiteral.java because of uimafit-legacy-support-2.0.0, but
there is no mention of the IBM UIMA License Agreement because of
jVinci-2.4.2
Peter
Am 12.02.2014 15:00, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote:
>> Hi Marshall,
>>
>> to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
>>
>> This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
>> Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
>> All rights reserved,
>> Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
>> Technische Universität Darmstadt.
>> All rights reserved.
>>
>> to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some questions
>> about the NOTICE file in general.
>>
>> 1)
>> The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
>> libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the licensing-howto
>> correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for all of that libraries,
>> e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
> Sort of. You have to examine the NOTICE contents and copy up the parts that
> apply, excluding "This product includes software developed at The Apache
> Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).", which is already in the file (no
> need to duplicate this).
>
> See also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
>> 2)
>> As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
>> project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
>> instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT is not
>> delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE file for
>> ruta-core. Is this correct?
> Yes. The NOTICE file for a bundled artifact is only for those dependencies that
> are bundled into the deliverable artifact (in this case, the Jar).
>
>> Thanks for your help.
> Thank you for doing the Release Manager work :-)
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Martin Toepfer wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
>
> to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
>
> This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
> Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
> All rights reserved,
> Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
> Technische Universität Darmstadt.
> All rights reserved.
>
> to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some questions
> about the NOTICE file in general.
>
> 1)
> The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
> libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the licensing-howto
> correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for all of that libraries,
> e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
Sort of. You have to examine the NOTICE contents and copy up the parts that
apply, excluding "This product includes software developed at The Apache
Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).", which is already in the file (no
need to duplicate this).
See also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
> 2)
> As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
> project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
> instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT is not
> delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE file for
> ruta-core. Is this correct?
Yes. The NOTICE file for a bundled artifact is only for those dependencies that
are bundled into the deliverable artifact (in this case, the Jar).
>
> Thanks for your help.
Thank you for doing the Release Manager work :-)
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Martin Toepfer <ma...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
Hi Marshall,
to comply with uimaFIT's NOTICE file, I will add
This product contains uimaFIT - Core:
Copyright 2009-2012 Regents of the University of Colorado.
All rights reserved,
Copyright 2009-2012 Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab.
Technische Universität Darmstadt.
All rights reserved.
to the NOTICE file of ruta-ep-engine. However, I still have some
questions about the NOTICE file in general.
1)
The ruta-ep-engine project delivers not only uimaFIT, but also other
libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math. If I understand the
licensing-howto correctly, I will have to copy the NOTICE contents for
all of that libraries, e.g., Apache commons-math's NOTICE file.
2)
As far as I can tell by now, ruta-ep-engine should be the only relevant
project since the other projects do not deliver external libraries. For
instance, ruta-core also has a dependency to uimaFIT, however, uimaFIT
is not delivered by ruta-core, so we don't have to expand the NOTICE
file for ruta-core. Is this correct?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Martin
Am 11.02.2014 20:38, schrieb Marshall Schor:
> The rc looks remarkably good and clean!
>
> I did notice one thing (so far): Some of the Jars (e.g. ruta-ep-engine) contain
> the uimaFIT Jar, which has Notices that are missing from the containing Jar's
> NOTICE file.
>
> See https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep, where it says:
>
> If the dependency supplies a NOTICE file, its contents must be analyzed and
> the relevant portions bubbled up into the top-level NOTICE file.
>
> -Marshall
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache UIMA Ruta 2.2.0 RC1
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
The rc looks remarkably good and clean!
I did notice one thing (so far): Some of the Jars (e.g. ruta-ep-engine) contain
the uimaFIT Jar, which has Notices that are missing from the containing Jar's
NOTICE file.
See https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep, where it says:
If the dependency supplies a NOTICE file, its contents must be analyzed and
the relevant portions bubbled up into the top-level NOTICE file.
-Marshall