RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12923] - Message Services don't support m uliple methods anymore

[Glen Daniels <gd...@macromedia.com>]

Incidentally, for now I'm going to suggest that we generate schema in the WSDL which simply accepts xsd:any for message-style services.  Next step will be to allow embedding/importing schemas.

--Glen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@macromedia.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:51 PM
> To: 'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12923] - Message Services 
> don't support m
> uliple methods anymore
> 
> 
> 
> Namespace does matter in the RPC case, but we will try to 
> fall back to ignoring it, which I think is actually a BAD 
> thing, and I also think ignoring it is especially bad for 
> doc/message services.
> 
> If you want to have no namespace (i.e. <method>) that should 
> be fine, but I think we shouldn't just accept anything.  
> We're going to need to emit schema for this stuff eventually, 
> and that should dictate what people send.
> 
> How about this:
> 
> We'll generate OperationDescs for every allowed method on 
> Message-based services.  If you specify QNames in the WSDD, 
> they'll be mapped as per usual to those methods.  If you 
> don't, we will use the namespace of the service as specified 
> in the WSDD to generate QNames, defaulting to "".  So:
> 
> <service name="foo" provider="java:MSG">
>   <parameter name="allowedMethods" value="*"/>
>   <parameter name="className" value="Foo"/>
> </service>
> 
> public class Foo {
>     public Element [] method1(Element [] arg);
>     public Element [] method2(Element [] arg);
> }
> 
> will look for "<method1>" and "<method2>".  If you add:
> 
> <namespace>http://foo</namespace>
> 
> to the WSDD, we'll then look for "<ns:method1 
> xmlns:ns='http://foo'>", etc.
> 
> --Glen
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bugzilla@apache.org [mailto:bugzilla@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:33 PM
> > To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12923] - Message Services don't support
> > muliple methods anymore
> > 
> > 
> > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
> > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12923>.
> > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
> > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> > 
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12923
> > 
> > Message Services don't support muliple methods anymore
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------- Additional Comments From dug@us.ibm.com  2002-09-23 
> > 16:32 -------
> > Does the namespace matter in the RPC case?  Not sure, but I 
> > don't think it does.
> > My inclination would be to get it back to the way it was so that
> > it doesn't break existing users.  If its possible to extend it so
> > that it will _also_ support the notion of namespace 
> qualification then
> > that could be added in addition to the non-NS qualification support.
> > 
>