You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com> on 2011/03/15 19:33:25 UTC
[1.5RC2] image..
Hi
I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in my
case we actually wanted the pictures to be read from cache (that way we can
avoid flickering). However it is not possible with Image to specify that you
do not want the anti cache appended.. Could we either have an option to tell
image that we don't want anti cache or at least have a mechanism so we can
override the appropriate parts.. Should I do an RFE?
regards Nino
Re: [1.5RC2] image..
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
oh the irony!
-igor
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1382
> Funny, it was you who asked for this feature :-)
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> because it changes references. So it does need to be repainted. Problem are
>> with the anticache parameter we are forcing the browser to download the
>> image again instead of pulling it from browser cache. That makes it
>> flicker...
>>
>> 2011/3/15 Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>>
>>> Why do you put the image in the AjaxRequestTarget if you don't want to
>>> repaint it ?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, nino martinez wael <
>>> nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in
>>> my
>>> > case we actually wanted the pictures to be read from cache (that way we
>>> can
>>> > avoid flickering). However it is not possible with Image to specify that
>>> > you
>>> > do not want the anti cache appended.. Could we either have an option to
>>> > tell
>>> > image that we don't want anti cache or at least have a mechanism so we
>>> can
>>> > override the appropriate parts.. Should I do an RFE?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > regards Nino
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Grigorov
>>> jWeekend
>>> Training, Consulting, Development
>>> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: [1.5RC2] image..
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1382
Funny, it was you who asked for this feature :-)
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
> because it changes references. So it does need to be repainted. Problem are
> with the anticache parameter we are forcing the browser to download the
> image again instead of pulling it from browser cache. That makes it
> flicker...
>
> 2011/3/15 Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
>
>> Why do you put the image in the AjaxRequestTarget if you don't want to
>> repaint it ?
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, nino martinez wael <
>> nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in
>> my
>> > case we actually wanted the pictures to be read from cache (that way we
>> can
>> > avoid flickering). However it is not possible with Image to specify that
>> > you
>> > do not want the anti cache appended.. Could we either have an option to
>> > tell
>> > image that we don't want anti cache or at least have a mechanism so we
>> can
>> > override the appropriate parts.. Should I do an RFE?
>> >
>> >
>> > regards Nino
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Grigorov
>> jWeekend
>> Training, Consulting, Development
>> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
>>
>
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
Re: [1.5RC2] image..
Posted by nino martinez wael <ni...@gmail.com>.
because it changes references. So it does need to be repainted. Problem are
with the anticache parameter we are forcing the browser to download the
image again instead of pulling it from browser cache. That makes it
flicker...
2011/3/15 Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> Why do you put the image in the AjaxRequestTarget if you don't want to
> repaint it ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in
> my
> > case we actually wanted the pictures to be read from cache (that way we
> can
> > avoid flickering). However it is not possible with Image to specify that
> > you
> > do not want the anti cache appended.. Could we either have an option to
> > tell
> > image that we don't want anti cache or at least have a mechanism so we
> can
> > override the appropriate parts.. Should I do an RFE?
> >
> >
> > regards Nino
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
>
Re: [1.5RC2] image..
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Why do you put the image in the AjaxRequestTarget if you don't want to
repaint it ?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.wael@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in my
> case we actually wanted the pictures to be read from cache (that way we can
> avoid flickering). However it is not possible with Image to specify that
> you
> do not want the anti cache appended.. Could we either have an option to
> tell
> image that we don't want anti cache or at least have a mechanism so we can
> override the appropriate parts.. Should I do an RFE?
>
>
> regards Nino
>
--
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>