You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Hongze Zhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/05/16 15:29:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CALCITE-3075) Evaluate Travis CI for Windows build

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16841454#comment-16841454 ] 

Hongze Zhang edited comment on CALCITE-3075 at 5/16/19 3:28 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

One possible disadvantage of AppVeyor might be the performance - Now Calcite's AppVevor CI need ~18 min to finish a build, as a comparison Travis CI costs ~13 min. Not sure if for Windows build Travis can still be faster. It would be much appreciated if anyone has experience on Travis+Windows and be willing to share some.


was (Author: zhztheplayer):
One possible disadvantage of AppVeyor might be the performance - Now Calcite's AppVevor CI need ~20 min to finish a build, as a comparison Travis CI costs ~13 min. Not sure if for Windows build Travis can still be faster. It would be much appreciated if anyone has experience on Travis+Windows and be willing to share some.

> Evaluate Travis CI for Windows build
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3075
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3075
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Hongze Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>
> Travis.org supports running CI on Windows now: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2018-10-11-windows-early-release, it is probably worth to investigate if running Windows CI using Travis would benefit us more than AppVevor can do.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)