Re: Apache 1.0.0 ignores HUP

[Andrew Wilson <an...@tees.elsevier.co.uk>]

Seen this problem a couple of times now.  Anyone know if this
solution is reasonable?

Ay.

willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu (Will Day) wrote:
>A short time ago, at a computer terminal far, far, away, Ben Beecher wrote:
>>We are running Apache 1.0.0 compiled with the mod_log_config module,
>>running on two identical Solaris 2.4 machines with the current jumbo
>>patch.  On one machine the server works properly, but on the other
>>machine it ignores HUPs and is not logging any requests.  Can you help
>>us identify the problem?
>
>When I set up Apache/1.0.0 on a couple of our Solaris 2.4 machines
>here, I observed the same behavior.  After adding the following to the
>bottom of httpd.h, it worked fine:
>
>#ifdef SOLARIS2
>	#define signal sigset
>#endif /* SOLARIS2 */
>
>I'm not sure of the details; one of the other system programmers had
>suggested this, as he said he'd seen problems with Solaris signal
>handling with the "signal" call before.
>
>______________________________________________________________________________
>Will Day       <PGP mail preferred>      OIT, Georgia Tech, Atlanta 30332-0715
>willday@rom.oit.gatech.edu               http://rom.oit.gatech.edu/~willday/
>     =-> Opinions expressed are mine alone and do not reflect OIT policy <-=
>Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary 
>Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
>    Benjamin Franklin, Pennsylvania Assembly, Nov. 11, 1755
news:4d6ul1$c7m@rom.oit.gatech.edu