You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@diversity.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2019/06/21 19:09:29 UTC
Re: Does Outreachy mean we are paying for code? Is that acceptable?
(was Re: Why does the ASF not pay for development?)
On 2019/06/21 18:56:34, Naomi S <n....@tumbolia.org> wrote:
does that alleviate your concerns about “choosing winners”?>
> (which is, as far as I understand if, the root motivation for “don’t pay>
> for code”)>
It is one motivation, but not the root.
The root is that by doing so, you destroy the social fabric crucial to the success of volunteer-led, collaborative and consensus-based community development.
Cheers
Re: Does Outreachy mean we are paying for code? Is that acceptable?
(was Re: Why does the ASF not pay for development?)
Posted by Naomi S <no...@tumbolia.org>.
can you expand on that please? how would it do that?
On Fri 21. Jun 2019 at 21:09, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/06/21 18:56:34, Naomi S <n....@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> does that alleviate your concerns about “choosing winners”?>
> > (which is, as far as I understand if, the root motivation for “don’t
> pay>
> > for code”)>
>
> It is one motivation, but not the root.
>
> The root is that by doing so, you destroy the social fabric crucial to the
> success of volunteer-led, collaborative and consensus-based community
> development.
>
> Cheers